Vote as if Donald Trump was on the Ballot.

by Rod Williams, Oct. 21, 2026- It is hard to absorb and keep track of all the despicable things the Trump administration is doing. Each day is a new outrage. Outrages mount so quickly that any one thing gets lost.  Whether it is the betrayal of Ukraine and openly siding with Putin, destroying NATO, wrecking the economy with tariffs, advancing Trump socialism, massive deficit spending, raiding homes without warrants, suppressing the press, meddling in the election process, selling pardons, using the power of the presidency for personal gain, or any number of other things, it is hard to focus on any one thing.

This has got to be curtailed. It won't end until Trump is out of office, but we can tamp it down. I have concluded that Democrats need to take Congress. This is not a recent conclusion, but I am now of the view that it is the most important consideration in these mid-term elections. The Trump corruption, mismanagement, and betrayal of the West are so severe that it is even necessary to elect the craziest of Democrats in order to clip Trump's wings. 

Some have said of me that I have changed and am now a liberal. I am not. I am a Buckley-Reagan conservative. I have not changed; It is the Republican Party that has changed. The Republican Party sold its soul and abandoned the things it once held dear. I think it is time for people of good faith and decency to abandon the Republicans, at least temporarily, until sanity is restored.

Back in December, when Democrat nut-job Aftyn Behn and Republican Matt Van Epps were running for the 7th Congressional seat, I voted for Van Epps. At that time, I thought it would be better for the country if Democrats took the House, but I could not bring myself to vote for Behn. If I had a do-over, I would vote for her. I don't like her. I do not share her policy preferences or her values, and I do share those of Van Epps, however, this is not about which candidate I like the most. It is not even a vote about policy preferences or ideology; it is about voting strategically. It is about voting as if Donald Trump were on the ballot, and I would vote against Donald Trump. Curtailing the power of Donald Trump to do more harm to our country is the most important issue in this election. 

If we do elect a few Socialists or other weird woke nut-jobs, they won't be able to accomplish anything anyway. The worst of the lot are a minority in their own party, and Dems will not get a veto-proof majority in any event.  They won't be able to pass Medicare for all, or defund the police, or close the prisons. What they will be able to do is hold hearings and investigate. They will be able to expose the recklessness, illegal actions, mismanagement, and corruption of the Trump administration. 

The greatest threat to our freedom, world peace, and prosperity is Donald Trump. It is time to hold your nose and vote for some odious Democrats in order to save our democracy. Vote as if Donald Trump were on the ballot. 

Top Stories

The Case for Proportional Representation

by Rod Williams, Aug.20, 2026- Yesterday, initially spurred by a Facebook post by Raph Bristol, which I reposted to my page, Michael Dioguardi and I had a discussion of proportional representation. I was only vaguely informed about the concept.  Michael explained it and made the case for it. I think I am almost persuaded.

Unfortunately, with so many people vested in and accustomed to our current two-party, winner-take-all system, changing how we elect our political leaders would be difficult.  However, proportional representation is legally possible under the existing constitutional and statutory frameworks. The Constitution does not even mention political parties, and the founders warned against them.

In my view, with the rise of Donald Trump and the more extreme factions controlling the parties, and the moderate, sensible center shrinking, I think it is time to question the way we govern ourselves. 

Below is the conversation:

 Ralph Bristol:

THE NEW NORMAL?

ORLANDO, Fla.—Rep. Byron Donalds, President Trump’s staunch ally, cruised to victory in the Republican contest in Florida to succeed Gov. Ron DeSantis, while a Democratic socialist, state Rep. Angie Nixon, scored an upset win in the Democrats’ Senate primary.

Is it my imagination or is there less and less room in politics for anyone other than a staunch Trump ally and a Democratic socialist? 

I'll bet a lot of people are feeling "disenfranchised." I know I am.

Michael Dioguardi:

 

Michael Dioguardi

I did not know Donalds was fully aligned with Trump but listening to interviews with him in months past, he sounded sane and reasonable.

Hopefully he serves the people of Florida first and does not have his nose up Trump’s behind like Ogles did.

The larger question about socialism and Trumpism is spot-on, but I think the deeper problem is structural. Our primary system and single-member districts reward the most partisan and intensely motivated voters, then force everyone else into a winner-take-all choice between candidates they may not actually support.

The answer to that is often, “Then people should vote in the primary.” But voting in a primary does not make the resulting system representative. A primary selects one candidate for a party. The general election then selects one person to represent an entire district containing people with many different political views.

Nobody is forced to vote, but the structure does force a winner-take-all outcome. If 45% vote for A and 55% vote for B, B receives 100% of the representation. Those 45% do not become represented simply because they had the opportunity to vote.

The result is predictable. Candidates have an incentive to appeal to the most partisan voters in the primary, then personalize the general election around defeating one opponent rather than persuading voters with competing ideas. The problem is not simply the candidates. It is the electoral structure that continually produces these incentives.

Consider a moderate Democrat or Republican faced with candidates representing the extremes of their respective parties. Whichever party wins, that voter may still have no meaningful representation. After repeatedly being told that the choice is between two candidates neither of whom represents them, apathy is hardly surprising.

Proportional representation changes the equation. A vote for a minority viewpoint can become a vote for actual representation rather than merely a vote against the candidate you fear most. That is the fundamental distinction between having the right to vote and having a reasonable expectation that your vote will produce representation.

Rod Williams

Rod Williams

How would that work in a congressional district? In Tennessee's 7th, Republican Matt Van Epps defeated Democratic state Rep. Aftyn Behn in the December 2, 2025 special election. to replace retired Rep. Mark Green in Nashville.

Final vote totals were approximately 180,000 votes. Matt Van Epps received 97,034 votes (53.9%), and Aftyn Behn (D) received 81,109 votes (45.1%). So how would proportional representation work?

In the Dem primary, Democratic participation was about 31,002 voters.

Aftyn Behn 8,653 27.9%

Darden Copeland 7,720 24.9%

Bo Mitchell 7,498 24.2%

Vincent Dixie 7,153 23.1%

I understand ranked choice, which, if we had it, would most likely have resulted in Bo Mitchel being the nominee. I would have voted for him. Not that I would prefer his policies, but I think derailing Donald Trump's agenda is important. I could not vote for nut-job socialist Afyn Behn, however, and voted for Vam Epps.

So how would proportional representation worked in the primary and the general election?

Michael Dioguardi

 The first thing to understand is that proportional representation would not simply take the existing congressional districts, the existing two parties, and divide the existing election results among multiple seats. That would miss the entire point.

Under PR, the districts would be larger and multi-member, and the number of seats assigned to each district would be determined by the system adopted. More importantly, the political dynamics would change. If voters knew that a party receiving 10%, 15%, or 20% of the vote could actually win representation, they would have far less reason to abandon that party and vote strategically for one of the two major parties.

We would therefore likely see more parties competing and different coalitions of voters emerging. The electoral map would not simply produce a proportional version of today’s Republican and Democratic vote totals. It would produce a political landscape that more accurately reflects the range of views that actually exist.

That is why I would not use the Van Epps/Behn result to say, “54% would get this many seats and 45% would get that many.” That assumes today’s two-party SMD election would somehow exist unchanged under PR. It would not. The point of PR is to change the incentives so that voters can support the party or political philosophy they actually prefer and have that support translated into representation.

There is another important part of this. PR would not simply give the existing Republican and Democratic factions more seats. It would change the incentives that produce those factions in the first place.

Today, a voter who is politically moderate may have little choice but to identify with whichever major party is closer to them, even if neither party actually represents their views. Meanwhile, the most intensely partisan voters have disproportionate influence because they dominate primaries and determine which candidates emerge.

Under PR, those dynamics change. The more ideological voters could have a party that genuinely represents their views without having to capture one of the two major parties, while moderates could likewise support a party that actually reflects their preferences. Instead of forcing the entire political spectrum into two parties and then allowing the most motivated factions to fight for control of them, PR allows that spectrum to be represented by multiple parties.

So the point is not simply to take today’s election results and divide them among multiple seats. The point is to create an electoral system in which the political choices themselves become more representative.

Rod Williams

 Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. So, we would have far fewer, much larger districts? Would such a system require a much larger Congress? Are there examples of democracies having such a system?

Michael Dioguardi

 You are correct. And yes, there are plenty of real-world examples. Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Norway, and Finland are all examples of countries whose national legislatures are elected through proportional representation rather than the single-member-district system used by the United States and United Kingdom. Germany and New Zealand are also proportional systems, but they use mixed-member systems, so I would not include them in this comparison.

The important point is that PR does not simply take today’s two-party election results and divide them among multiple seats. Once voters know that smaller parties can actually win representation, the incentives change. Voters have a reason to support the party that actually reflects their views, which produces a political landscape far more diverse than the two-party system we see today.

And any concerns one may have about PR are mitigated by the Senate as the body representing each state because the Senate preserves the federal principle. The House would represent the people proportionally, while the Senate would continue to represent the states equally, regardless of population or political composition. One chamber would therefore reflect the diversity of political opinion among Americans, while the other would protect the sovereignty and interests of the states.

Rod Williams

So, would this eliminate primaries?

Michael Dioguardi

Yes, it would, and that is one of the significant advantages of PR. The exact mechanics depend on whether an open or closed list is adopted, but either way the current primary system becomes unnecessary.

With a closed list, parties would determine their candidates and voters would choose among parties in the general election. The idea here is that voters are primarily choosing a party based on its ideals and platform rather than choosing one individual candidate.

With an open list, voters could choose individual candidates within each party directly in the general election. That also recognizes that a party is not necessarily ideologically uniform. A Republican ballot, for example, could include several Republican candidates with different views, and voters could decide which candidates receive seats. The idea here is that voters choose both the party whose ideals they support and the candidates they believe best represent those ideals, even when there is not complete uniformity among the candidates.

After the votes are tallied, seats are allocated to each party based on the percentage of the vote that party receives. In an open-list system, voters can choose among as many candidates as the electoral rules permit. If a party hypothetically fields 50 candidates but earns enough votes for only five seats, the five candidates with the strongest individual support would receive those seats. There is no requirement that the party limit itself to a single candidate, as it must under our current single-member system.

That eliminates the need for a separate primary whose purpose is to select one candidate to represent an entire party in a winner-take-all contest. More importantly, candidates would no longer have to appeal disproportionately to the most partisan voters who dominate primaries. They would have to persuade voters in the general election, while voters would have more choices both between parties and within them. That is another way PR changes the political dynamic: instead of forcing diverse viewpoints into two parties and then forcing each party to choose one person, it allows that diversity to be expressed directly through the general election.

If you would like to join the conversations, follow or friend me on Facebook. 

Michael Dioguardi is a friend of mine living here in Nashville and along with three or four other well-informed, smart people, we get together once a month for a dinner to discuss current events and ideas. He is a residential property manager in Nashville and is an independent blogger writing under the title Seeker of Liberty. Drawing on years of dedicated study of the U.S. Constitution, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, landmark court decisions, and Austrian School economics, he analyzes contemporary challenges to individual liberty, institutional accountability, and economic stability. 

 

Top Stories

Is Trump Trying to Lose the Midterms

by Rod Williams, July 28, 2026- I continue to be amazed that President Trump acts as if he doesn't care if Republicans win the midterms. Not that I am disappointed; I am just amazed. I am actually hoping Dems do win the midterms. Congress needs to provide oversight, and they just don't want to do it. There needs to be hearings about the Trump corruption, the Constitutional transgression, the out-of-control ICE, which continues to murder people on the streets of American cities, the Epstein files, the weaponization of the Justice Department, and much more. 

Republicans fall into two bad camps regarding Trump: they either are true believers and support the authoritarian agenda or they are cowards who will not dare cross him. We need to elect Democrats in order to stop Trump. Even some Republicans who I suspect are pre-Trump traditional conservatives will not do what they know is the right thing to do, so they are useless.

All of the above being said, there are limits to how far I can go in supporting Democrats. While I would gladly welcome Chaz Molder's defeat of Andy Ogles, I could not vote for Aftyn Behn, however. In that recent 7th Congressional District race, I voted for Matt Van Eppes. I will not vote for a Socialist. To vote for a DSA is jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. I know sometimes it is a tough choice to make, and anyone concerned about Trump's authoritarian agenda has to make the decision of where to draw the line for themselves. 

Back to the subject of this post. It seems Trump is doing all he can to ensure Republicans lose the midterm. The war in Iran is going badly, and gas prices are elevated and fluctuate day to day. With the election less than 100 days away, and people doing summer traveling, and gas prices being something people care about and are aware of, gas prices do not bode well for a Republican victory. If Trump had built support for the war among Congress and our allies and sold the need for this war to the American people, people might be more forgiving of the pain caused by the war and see it as a necessary sacrifice, but Trump went it alone and did not bring the country along with him. He alone will get the blame for the rising gas prices.

Also, Trump will not stay on message and tout the good things, or arguably good things, Republicans are doing, such as some things in the Big Beautiful Bill or the recently passed Housing Bill.  He can't brag about the Housing bill because he refused to sign it. It passed despite Trump. I had reservations about that bill myself, but it could be bragging rights for Republicans if Trump had championed it.  Instead of talking about economic issues, he can't stop talking about the "stolen" 2020 elections or engaging in his insult humor, attacking critics and reporters. Maybe it's just me, because I never did like it, but I think his schtick is getting old. Even if the base eats it up, when he is talking about the stolen election or insulting reporters, he is not focused on the economy. Also, when Trump's name is not on the ballot, many people who voted for Trump don't vote. He should be trying to make sure those people make it to the polls. He isn't. 

The worst way Trump is sabotaging the GOP before the midterms is by going on another tariff rampage. While the diehard Trumpinistas believe anything Trump says even if it makes no sense, most Americans know that a tariff is paid for by the consumers. A tariff is the equivalent of a sales tax, and most Americans know it.

Here is what National Review had to say on the topic:

Trump Sabotages the Economy, Right Before the Midterms

by Jim Geraghty, National Review, July 28, 2026 - ...  By obsessively hiking tariffs at every opportunity, President Trump has put every Republican running for office this year in a much tougher spot than they had to be — to say nothing of how his policies have made all kinds of goods more expensive than they had to be. It is one of the most astonishingly self-destructive moves any president has ever made in economic policy, and no matter how much the evidence piles up, the president insists the tariffs are working great, and that America is enjoying a “golden age.”

Incumbent Republicans, you could have been running for reelection in a roaring economy, but a president addicted to tariffs wouldn’t let you. ... 60 percent of U.S. adults say Trump’s policies have made the economy worse, while just 20 percent say Trump’s policies have made the economy better. ... 

... Since taking office, the Trump administration has collected $445 billion in tariff revenue, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. Where do you think all that money is coming from? If you said, “foreign countries,” you’re wrong.

... The New York Fed found “about three-quarters of businesses facing tariff-induced cost increases in both the manufacturing and service sectors passed along at least some of these higher costs to their customers by raising prices. Almost a third of manufacturers and about 45 percent of service firms reported fully passing along all tariff-related cost increases, while 45 percent of manufacturers and a third of service firms said they passed along some but not all of the cost increase.”

...  tariffs are a big factor in the cost of living, which is a big factor in Americans’ perceptions of the economy, which are a big reason why Trump’s job approval rating is around 40 percent, which is a big reason why Republicans are in trouble in the upcoming midterm elections. (read it all)

 

Top Stories

Who's Running for What

by Rod Williams, July 16, 2026 - I was preparing to compile a post on the topic of 'who's running for what," but then came across an excellent post from the Pamphleteer on the topic and am reposting it here. Their article is much better than what I would have had the time to compile.

I try to be respectful of copyrighted material, but sometime back I asked the Editor in Chief if I could, on occasion, repost Pamphleteer articles and was given verbal permission. The pamphleteer is an excellent publication with a small staff, focusing on Nashville arts, culture, and politics. If you are not familiar with the publication, please check it out at this link and consider becoming a subscriber. It is important to support quality, independent journalism. Here is the article:

Who's Running for What

By The Pamphleteer, Newsletter • 16 Jul 2026 - Early primary voting kicks off tomorrow. The GOP primary for governor has grabbed all the headlines, but contests for the GOP spot in the 6th Congressional District, the Democrat spot in the 7th Congressional District, and the Democrat spot in House District 59 are also worth monitoring.

Noticeably absent from any Davidson County ballot is the District 5 race. Nashville is now split between Congressional Districts 4, 6, and 7. Early voting and sample ballot information is available on the Davidson County Election Commission website. Use your address to find your new congressional district here.

A breezy look through the races follows with fundraising totals for the candidates in competitive races. If you want to dig deeper into candidate funding, Who Funds Tennessee is an excellent resource.

✰   ✰   ✰

Governor 
Though the Democratic side of the ticket is crowded, the real contest is unfolding on the Republican side of the ticket. U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn entered the race as the clear frontrunner, but a few late-campaign missteps has given Republican challengers U.S. Rep. John Rose and state Rep. Monty Fritts an opening to close the gap.

John Rose (R): $10,876,559 raised; heavily self-funded
Marsha Blackburn (R): $9,541,518 raised; significant out-of-state contributions
Monty Fritts (R): $281,860 raised; distant third

Campaign finance records show that PACs have spent more than $2.5 million supporting Blackburn. The D.C.-based Tennessee Freedom Fund PAC raised $4.6 million from April to June to target Rose.

✰   ✰   ✰

U.S. Senate 
The only competition in Tennessee’s U.S. Senate primary race is on the Democratic ticket. Sitting Senator Bill Hagerty is enjoying an uncontested primary run and is highly favored in November’s general election.

Meanwhile, a slew of challengers will be duking it out for the Democratic nod over the next month. That said, the campaign finance disclosures show just how unserious Hagerty’s competition is.

✰   ✰   ✰

U.S. House District 4
 Incumbent Congressman Scott DesJarlais is the clear favorite in the new 4th Congressional District GOP primary. The district remains heavily Republican, making the GOP primary the real contest, but he faces a well-funded challenger on the Democratic side in Metro Councilmember Mike Cortese. Cortese is battling it out with Victoria Broderick—who previously ran for the 4th District in 2024—alongside a few other underdogs.  

Scott DesJarlais (R, incumbent) $523,391 raised; 81% from out of state
Mike Cortese (D)  $706,113 raised; best-funded in the race

✰   ✰   ✰

U.S. House District 6 
A contentious primary race is cooking up for Congressman John Rose’s open seat in District 6. State Representative Johnny Garrett and former TN-4 U.S. representative Van Hilleary are the top Republican candidates in pursuit of the nomination, with underdog Jon Henry a distant third on the fundraising front.

Johnny Garrett (R): $2.2 million raised
Van Hilleary (R): $1.5 million raised
Jon Henry (R): $67 thousand raised

Chaney Mosley, Mike Croley, and Lore Bergman—who has previously challenged Rose as the Democratic nominee for this congressional district—look to be the most competitive Democratic candidates in this race.

Though the new TN-6 lines make it somewhat less Republican-leaning than the previous version of the district, it is still a Republican-favored seat.

✰   ✰   ✰

U.S. House District 7 
Congressman Matt Van Epps, who recently tasted victory after winning the special 7th District congressional election to replace Mark Green last year, faces no competition in the Republican primaries.

On the Democratic ticket, likely frontrunners are Darden Copeland—who is the strongest fundraiser on the ticket—and state Representative Vincent Dixie—an elected official with strong grassroots support. 

Darden Copeland (D) $677,614 raised; 53% from out of state
Vincent Dixie (D) $218,197 raised

✰   ✰   ✰

State Senate 
The only contested state senate race on the Davidson County ballot is District 17. Newcomer Theodore (Butch) Baker has an uphill battle against incumbent state Senator Mark Pody for the Republican nomination. Only two Democrats are competing for the primary nod: Joni Cochran and Lindsey Patrick-Wright.

Mark Pody (R, incumbent) $674,051 raised
Butch Baker (R) $46,430 raised
Joni Cochran (D) $88,166 raised
Lindsey Patrick-Wright (D) $44,732 raised

Tennessee Senate District 19 incumbent Charlane Oliver and District 21 incumbent Jeff Yarbro are both uncontested.

✰   ✰   ✰

State House 

The only competitive House seat primary is on the Democratic side of the ticket in state Rep. Caleb Hemmer’s vacated District 59 seat. A crowded field finds Rick Ewing, husband of councilmember Sandy Ewing, attorney Angie Lawless, former THP Mark Proctor, and nonprofit executive Beth West duking it out for the opportunity to take on uncontested Republican nominee Bill Hancock in November.

Mark Proctor (D) $171,515 raised; top D59 Dem. fundraiser
Angie Lawless (D) $121,200 raised; 43% self-funded
Rick Ewing (D) $82,886 raised
Beth West (D) $65,558 raised
Bill Hancock (R) $225,251 raised; sitting on ~$205K cash for November

In Districts 52, 55, and 60, both the Republican candidate and the Democrat candidate will advance uncontested. Republicans don’t have challengers in House Districts 50 (Bo Mitchell), 51 (Aftyn Behn), 53 (Jason Powell), 56 (Bob Freeman), and 58 (Harold M. Love, Jr.).

✰   ✰   ✰

County General Elections

You’ll also find a number of uncompetitive county general election races on your ballot, including judgeships, school board members, and the sheriff. Given the Republican Party’s lack of candidates during May’s primaries, all candidates are uncontested.

Top Stories

The Deck is Stacked in Andy Ogles Favor as Republicans Choose New Voters for Ogles

The New 5th

by Rod Williams, May 15, 2026-The redrawn newly adopted Tennessee Congressional maps have shifted the 5th Congressional seat to the west of Nashville, running through rural west Tennessee to the Mississippi River and south along the river to the outskirts of Memphis. As reported by The Tennessean, the new 5th Congressional district has only 17% of the same people as the current district. It looks like the district was purposely redrawn to improve Ogles chances for reelection. The new 5th includes none of Davidson County, where Ogles is unpopular and cuts Ogles ' strongest challenger out of the district. The new lines split Maury County and Columbia, putting Ogles in the district and cutting Columbia mayor Chaz Molder out of the district.

This is disappointing and disturbing. Politicians should not get to select their voters. I do not live in the 5th and cannot vote against Ogles even if the district lines had not changed, but would if I could. I had already sent Molder a modest contribution and was prepared to send more.  

Ogles is pathetic. It looks like he stays up late at night reading Trump's Truth Social post, so he can be the first to propose legislation the next morning to enact into law whatever insane weird thought Trump had at 2:30 AM during the night. Luckly none of it makes it into law, but Ogles gets some face time on Fox news and a pat on the head from Trump. Ogles has got to be Trump's number one lapdog, bootlicker, or whatever term you want to use to describe such subservient sycophant behavior. 

The Current 5th

I was excited that it was looking like Ogles could be defeated. I was excited that it looked like Democrats were going to choose a sensible moderate to challenge Ogles as opposed to some progressive woke nut-job, like they did when they chose Aftyn Behn as their candidate for the 7th Congressional District last year. Democrats had a chance to take the 7th but threw it away. 

Some time ago, I reached the conclusion that to stop Trump's authoritarian agenda, Democrats needed to retake the House. I live in the 7th and when there was a special election to fill the vacant seat for this district, I was prepared to vote for a Democrat and then the Democrat nominee turned out to be Aftyn Behn, and I just couldn't do it. I voted for Republican Van Epps. 

It looks like in the race against Ogles, Democrats were not going to make the same mistake they made in nominating Behn in the 7th. Molder looks like the kind of candidate that disaffected Republicans and independents could support. Unfortunately, Republican lawmakers have chosen a new set of voters for Ogles, and it will now be much harder to unseat him. 

Molder has been gaining momentum, and the more I have learned about him, the more I like him.  He has raised more than $1.8 million since he announced his candidacy and more that 85% of it came from Tennesseans. That is a lot of money. Congressman Ogles has only raised about $440,000. It was looking like Molder could actually beat Ogles. 

Molder has announced that he is still running for Congress in the 5th. Good for him. U.S. representatives are not required to live in the districts they represent. I am glad Ogles will have a strong challenger. Unfortunately, it is going to be even more of an uphill battle for Molder. The new district looks a lot safer for a Trumpinista Republican than did the old district. I will keep following this campaign and hope for Trump's popularity to continue to drop and that there is a blue wave big enough to sweep Andy Ogles out of office, but the new maps make it much harder to unseat America's worst congressman. 

Top Stories

‘An Existential Crisis’: Residents Pay for Nashville Boom, Says Financial Times

by Rod Williams, May 6, 2026 - The Financial Times has published an article addressing the rising cost of living in Nashville, focusing on rising property taxes. The article is behind a paywall and reading it is not worth the hassle of registering in order to get your one free article. For any informed Nashvillian, the article does not tell you anything you don't already know. It is the fact that it is in the Financial Times and the story will reach a wider audience that is newsworthy, not what the article says.

To summarize the piece, property taxes have increased substantially, and some locals are being priced out of the city. A lot of people who live here could not afford to buy here if they did not already own their own home. Local businesses as well as residents are being hit. Unfortunately, the article implies that the problem is not a bloated city government, but that we do not have an income tax. The politician they chose to feature in addressing the issue of Nashville's affordability is woke socialist Rep. Aftyn Behn.

Here is an excerpt:

‘An Existential Crisis’: Residents Pay for Nashville Boom

Claire Jones in Nashville and Ian Hodgson in Washington, Financial Times, Published May 4 2026 -After a long career in show business, Tom Morales was looking forward to leaving Acme Feed & Seed, his Nashville music venue, to his children. But a letter from the city last October changed everything.

Morales’s property taxes had jumped from $129,000 a year to $589,000. “You just open up the envelope and say, ‘What? This can’t be right,’” said Morales. “Having a business you can give to your kids is something you dream about. I was like, ‘Oh my God, I’ve just ruined their lives.’”

“We were thinking it would go up 30, 40 per cent; I could never have imagined it was going to go up 380 or 400 per cent,” added his daughter, Lauren.

Morales is not alone. Nashville has transformed over the past decade as big business and new residents moved in, lured by Tennessee’s zero income tax rate and a booming tourism economy. (read more)

Top Stories

TN-05 in Play if Chaz Molder is the Dem Nominee

 

by Emily Cochrane and Reid J. Epstein, New York Times, April 20, 2026- As the mule-drawn floats and carts lined up for the annual Mule Day parade in Columbia, Tenn., Mayor Chaz Molder, a Democratic donkey in conservative country, ....

That Mr. Ogles’s seat is even in the conversation is an indication of the political shape Republicans find themselves in as they approach the midterm elections. Anger over President Trump’s war in Iran, spiking gas prices and persistent affordability concerns have led to shifts of up to 20 percentage points in recent elections compared with the 2024 election that returned Mr. Trump to the White House.

Tennessee Republicans thought they drew a safe seat during the last redistricting cycle, .... (read it all)

Rod's Comment: I hope Molder wins the nomination. Ogles can be beaten if a sane moderate Dem like Molder is the nominee. If Dems want to lose this seat, then nominate some woke nut-job like Aftyn Behn. I could not bring myself to vote for Behn, although I want Dems to win the mid-term. I voted for Van Epps. Ogles is maybe the worse most Trumpy Republican in Congress. I am contributing to the Molder campaign. 

Top Stories

George Conway is the Kind of Person we Need in the U.S. Congress to Stop Donald Trump

by Rod Williams, Jan. 10, 2026- I just made a contribution to a Democrat running for Congress.

Kamala Harris was the first Democrat I ever made a campaign contribution to in my life, and it was not because I liked Kamala Harris or supported her policies; it was because Donald Trump had attempted a coup to overturn the results of an election, and I feared what he might do if he regained the White House. My fear of what Donald Trump might do has been borne out, and he is not finished yet. He is tampling the Constitution and destroying the world liberal rules-based order and replacing it with a Lord of the Flies disorder in which the only rule is that might makes right. 

I didn't make a large contribution to the Harris campaign; I think it might have only been fifty dollars, or maybe a hundred. It wasn't a lot, but I felt I needed to do something to try to help stop Donald Trump from regaining the White House. Since then, I have made a $100 contribution to a Democratic PAC called Win the Center. This is a Democratic group trying to pull the Party away from the extreme left and back toward the center. I think this is important. I think sensible Democrats can win the midterm; I don't think far-left woke socialists can do so. If the Democratic Party becomes the party of Democratic Socialists, Bernie Sanders, AOC, and Aftyn Behn it will not get my vote. I am a conservative, but to stop the far right from destroying our democracy, I will hold my nose and vote for a center-left candidate; I will not vote for a far-left candidate. 

The only campaign contributions I ever made to Democrats were to the Harris candidacy and the PAC listed above. Today I made a contribution to another Democratic candidate.  I just sent a $100 contribution to George Conway, who has announced his candidacy for New York's 12th Congressional District.  I won't be sending money to every Democrat running everywhere, but I feel George Conway would be a much-needed voice in Congress. 

In my view, the Democratic response to Trump has been weak and lackluster. Dems are just too timid and everything they say seems to be poll-tested and consultant-driven. Conway speaks with passion, the kind of passion I think the threat to our democracy and the threat to the world rules-based order deserves. Also, I am impressed with George Conway's analysis and thoughtfulness. Trump has shown there are weaknesses in the structure of our democracy, and George Conway has ideas as to what reforms are needed to protect us from a future Donald Trump. 

I sent $100 to Conway's campaign. If his campaign gains traction, I will contribute more later. To learn more about George Conway or to contribute to his campaign, follow this link. 

Top Stories

I will Never Support "The Warmth of Collectivism."

by Rod Williams, Jan. 3, 2025- In his inaugural address, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani said that under his administration rugged individualism will be replaced by the "warmth of collectivism." That is chilling. 

As much as I detest Trumpian authoritarianism and corruption, I detest socialism and collectivism more. If the choice facing America is between an America First agenda or a socialist-collectivist agenda, I think most Americans will choose to continue with an America First agenda.

In the abstract, I would like to see Democrats regain control of Congress in the midterms. However, when I had a choice between a Republican backed by Donald Trump and a radical with the endorsement of the Democratic Socialist, I voted for the Trump-backed Republican. If Democrats regaining control of the House means supporting candidates like Zohran Mamdani, Bernie Sander, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Aftyn Behn, I will be pulling for the Republicans.

Top Stories

Will Democrats Learn the Wrong Lesson from the TN-07 Election

by Rod Williams, Dec. 6, 2025 - In a race that drew nationwide attention, Republican Van Epps beat  Democrat Aftyn Behn by a slim margin in the special election for Tennessee's 7th Congressional District. Both parties spent large amounts of money, and independent PACs also invested a substantial amount on their behalf. They each enlisted outside star power to support their campaigns. 

Pundits are still talking about the race and drawing conclusions. Some Democrats almost seem giddy. Despite losing, they are celebrating that the race was closer than many originally expected. Van Epps beat Behn by nearly 9 percentage points in a district Democrats have lost by more than 20 percentage points over the last several election cycles. In 2024, Rep. Mark Green, who retired from Congress this summer, creating the vacancy, was reelected by 21 percentage points. 

It is surprising to me that Behn came so close. While I voted for Van Epps, I have mixed views about whether I am pleased or alarmed that the election was so close.  If I view the election as a referendum on Donald Trump, then I am pleased. I can be pleased that Trump's authoritarianism and chaos are causing people such concern that they will even vote for a woke progressive socialist. 

If, instead of being pleased and seeing the election as a renunciation of Trumpism, I see that an extremist woke progressive socialist almost won an election in middle Tennessee, then I am alarmed. I am choosing the first position and taking the position that the election being close is a good sign that Trump's popularity is slipping. 

"Woke progressive" and "socialist" are terms loosely hurled at Democrats by Republicans, much the way "fascist" is hurled at Republicans by Democrats. Sometimes a person labeled a "woke progressive" is simply a liberal. In Atfyn Behn's case, I think it is an apt label. She has supported sex change operations for children, advocated defunding the police, denigrated motherhood, said men can birth babies, and uses the term "birthing people" instead of "mothers."  She also said she hates Nashville, the city she wants to represent, and she was endorsed by the Democratic Socialist Party. 

My friend Mark Rogers, an astute political observer and political practitioner, points out that the district was never as deep red as the 21-point victory by Green in 2024 indicates. Mark notes NBC's Steve Kornacki's insight when he said, "Of note, in the Dem-friendly 2018 midterm, GOP Senate nominee Marsha Blackburn won what is now TN-7 by 0.5 points over Democrat Phil Brededen. (The statewide margin was Blackburn +11)."

Mark Rogers says Phil Bredesen is the sort of pragmatic moderate that the extremists in both parties want to purge. "I know Phil Bredesen," says Mark, "and Aftyn Behn is no Phil Bredesen." 

I think I agree with Mark. If I take myself as by prime example, I was prepared to vote for a Democrat. I hold very few political views in common with Democrats, but I am concerned about the separation of powers and disappointed by how Republicans will not stand up to Trump on much of anything. Some things are so clear-cut that I am astounded that Republicans in Congress just allow Trump to act with impunity. A clear example is tariffs. The Constitution clearly says taxing power is a power of Congress, yet Congress has allowed Trump to set tariff rates. This is just one of many examples.  I think that if a Republican Congress will not stand up to Trump, then we need a Democrat Congress. Having said that, I could not bring myself to vote for someone as radical as Aftyn Behn. I explain this in more detail here.

I don't know how many people there are like me, who would have voted for a moderate Democrat but could not vote for a woke progressive Democrat. I suspect that there are quite a few people who could vote for someone like Phil Bredesen but not someone like AOC. I expect that Democrats are not going to see it that way. Performing fairly well with Aftyn Behn, I suspect Dems will think the Mandomi-Bernie-AOC brand of democrat will play well everywhere. I think Democrats will draw wrong conclusions and learn the wrong lessons.

Top Stories

A Different Democrat Could Have Made TN-07 Election a Closer Race.

Mark Rogers

by Mark Rogers, reposted from Facebook, Dec. 3, 2025-  Matt Van Epps wins the special election for the TN-07 Congressional District. This race will be dissected for months as we head into the 2026 cycle. A few thoughts so far:

1) Matt was the calmest and least radical-sounding candidate in the Republican primary and he won handily. He easily won early voting before Trump's endorsement came through. I believe his approach inoculated him from the dissatisfaction of some Republicans over the state and national situations.

2) The endorsement by Trump prevented most far-right voters from staying home after their candidates were defeated. 

3) Aftyn Behn ran excellent campaigns in the primary and the general, but the 'progressive' edge that helped her win in the first round hurt her in the second. 

4) I think Behn should have directly addressed her comments about Nashville, bachelorettes, police, and  (especially) country music early in the general election and put them behind her.  

5) If the Democrats in Tennessee think their future is going to be in following Behn and the two Justins, they are, I suspect, badly wrong. The Democrats dominated Tennessee for well over 150 years by balancing economic populism with Southern values. Embracing the AOC-Bernie-Kamala axis of Walmart Socialism and the cultural values of Hollywood won't win over Tennessee voters.

Mark Rogers has served in government, the non-profit sector, and politics. He is well known as a successful campaign manager and political consultant. He lives in Nashville

Rod's Comment:
I think Mark has hit the nail on the head. I was going to write something similar, but could not have said it better. As much as I am concerned about Trump's presidency and our march toward authoritarianism, and as much as I would like to see a Congress that would stand up to Trump, I could not bring myself to vote for Aftyn Behn. Had the candidate been Bo Mitchell or any moderate Democrat, I would have voted for the Democratic candidate. 

Top Stories

AOC Set to Campaign for TN-7 Democrat Aftyn Behn

by Rod Williams, Dec. 1, 2025 - Aftyn Behn the Democratic nominee for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, is set to hold a Get Out the Vote (GOTV) virtual rally tonight featuring special guests U.S. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14). The event is hosted on Zoom tonight and will be held from 7 to 8:30 pm. 

I went to Behn's website and could not find any additional information about the event. She has a "News and Press Campaign Updates feature." but this event is not mentioned. I don't know how one goes about signing up for the event, not that I would.

The elections is tomorrow, Dec. 2nd. 

Top Stories

Why I Voted for Matt Van Epps

Matt Van Epps

by Rod Williams, Nov. 27, 2025- Yesterday was the last day to vote in early voting, and I voted, casting my ballot for Matt Van Epps. It was a difficult choice. If these were normal times, it would not have been difficult at all.  I would have voted for the Republican and not had to think twice about it. These are not normal times.

I actually like Matt Van Epps. I followed the Republican primary closely and voted for Van Epps. To me, he appeared the most thoughtful and traditional conservative of the pack. He struck me as the least Trumpy. However, Trump endorsed him, and Van Epps has given no indications that he would stand up to Trump in Congress. 

I have been disgusted with the performance of Congress. It refuses to stand up to Trump on much of anything. From Trump's imposing of tariffs, which is a power given to Congress, to conducting extrajudicial killing in the Caribbean without a Congressional authorization of the use of force, to affirming Trump's nut-job appointees, and much more, Congress has surrendered its authority to the President. The Republican Congress has been useless and complicit. 

Congress should be a check on the Presidency, and the Republicans in Congress have totally capitulated. They have not checked his authoritarianism nor his corruption. For these reasons, I have thought we needed a Democratic majority in Congress that would check Trump's abuse of power. Believing this, and seeing Trump as an existential threat to American Democracy, I was ready to vote for the Democratic nominee. 

The more I learned about the Democratic nominee, however, the more I realized I would have a hard time voting for her. Since I assumed the race would handily be won by Van Epps, I thought for a while I might just not vote. I have never just not voted that I can recall, and I thought that I should at least express my displeasure with the choices before us at the ballot box.  I thought that I might vote and write in my own name. I have done that before. I briefly thought that I might vote for one of the other candidates, just as a protest vote. I reached the conclusion that I would vote, but not vote for either Van Epps or Behn.

As it became clear the race was tightening, I had to reconsider and think more carefully about my vote. Before, my vote would not have really mattered but now it could matter a great deal.  For the reasons listed above, seeing the only way to curtail Trump's authoritarianism was by voting for a Democratic Congress, I again considered voting for the Democratic nominee. However, if Behn won, power in Congress would not change hands. With the announcement from Marjorie Taylor Greene that she should resign on January 5th, the potential for Democrats recapturing Congress became more of a possibility, however, still a remote possibility.  Even if Behn won and Greene resigned, Democrats would still be short two votes from regaining power and being able to be a check on Trump. 

I just couldn't do it. I could not vote for someone whose values I do not share when the vote would have little impact on curtailing Trump's authoritarianism, so I ended up voting for Van Epps. If the Democratic nominee had been a moderate Democrat, I would have voted for the Democrat. Unfortunately, the Democratic nominee is a radical, woke progressive with the endorsement of the Democratic Socialists. 

I would like to think that Democrats would do better if they nominated normal Democrats, but I am not sure that is true. I am beginning to think that there are too few moderate people left to make it worthwhile to try to appeal to the middle.  The energy seems to lie with the radicals. For the few like me who Democrats could pick up by choosing a less radical nominee, they would lose the energy of the more radical Democrat activists.  As a strategy, maybe moving left makes sense. I am beginning to think there is no middle in American politics anymore. There is no center-left or center-right; there are only the extremes. I am beginning to think that our choices in the midterm and beyond are going to be between the radical woke progressive socialist Democrats and the nationalists, populist, authoritarian Republicans. I don't like that, but I'm afraid that's where we are. 

While I want Congress to be a check on Trump, I cannot vote for a radical like Aftyn Behn, who was a community organizer for left-wing organizations, who has the endorsement of the Democratic Socialists of America, and who advocates sex change operations for children, defunding the police, hates Nashville, denigrates motherhood, and believes men can give birth.  I just can't do it. 

Top Stories

Aftyn Behn Rushing the Governor's Office, Dragged Out Screaming and Crying

Top Stories

Aftyn Behn Says Men Can Give Birth

" Behn, who is currently a Tennessee state representative for District 51 and is running for the U.S. Congressional seat left vacant by former Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), used the term “birthers” before clarifying “men and women who can give birth” while speaking on her podcast Grits. She made the comment before discussing a book by pro-abortion feminist Jenny Brown called Birth Strike, which argues that women should refuse to have children as a way to collectively bargain with the government and achieve their political aims." (link)

Top Stories

Tennessee Dem Candidate Aftyn Behn: ‘I Don’t Want Children. I Want Power!’

 https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1993043067486527894?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1993043067486527894%7Ctwgr%5E405bbbe3c9f50560daef6c0f11ca512950f862ee%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftennessee-dem-candidate-aftyn-behn-i-dont-want-children-i-want-power

Top Stories

Democrat Candidate Aftyn Behn Said Prayer Makes Her ‘Deeply Uncomfortable’

"Democrat Candidate Aftyn Behn Said Prayer Makes Her ‘Deeply Uncomfortable’ In Resurfaced Audio Democrat Candidate Aftyn Behn Said Prayer Makes Her ‘Deeply Uncomfortable’ In Resurfaced Audio" Link

Top Stories

Poll Shows Van Epps 48%; Aftyn Behn 46%

 

link

Top Stories

With Marjorie Taylor Greene's Announced Resignation, the Behn-Van Epss Seat Becomes Even More Important.

Republican Matt Van Epss and Democrat Aftyn Behn

by Rod Williams, Nov. 25, 2025- The TN-07 special election for Congress has been getting lots of national attention. I must have seen half a dozen podcasters report on the race and several mainstream news outlets. Also, a lot of out-of-state money from independent groups is pouring into the race. Total independent expenditures by Democratic groups has reached $1.9 million so far and Republican groups have injected $2.4 million into the race. (1) The race has taken on a lot more importance with the announcement that Marjorie Taylor Green is resigning from Congress on January 5th. 

There is widespread belief that Democrats will retake the House in the midterms on November 3, 2026. Something like 20 House Republicans have already announced they will not be seeking reelection.  There is a possibility that the House could switch earlier, if things go right for Democrats. Part of things going right is Aftym Behn winning the upcoming Dec 2nd election. 

Republicans currently hold a 219-213 edge in the House of Representatives. With Green vacating a seat, the split will be 218 to 213.  There are two other special elections to fill vacant seats scheduled to take place soon, and Democrats are heavily favored in both races. One is in Texas to replace the late Representative Sylvester Turner who died in March, and the other in New Jersey to replace Governor-elect Mikie Sherrill, who last week resigned from her seat in the House of Representatives. The Texas special election is set for March, while the New Jersey race is set for April. (2) If  Democrats win these two seats in addition to the Marjorie Taylor Green seat being vacant, the split will be Republicans 218 to Democrats 215. If this happens and Aftyn Behn wins the TN-07 seat split would be 218-216. 

If that happens, then it only takes two Republicans to follow Marjorie Taylor Greene's example and retire early for the House to split 216-216. Punchbowl News is stating that "a few other GOP members" are "considering retiring in the middle of the term." (2) Should this happen it would lead to a power-sharing arrangement. If three resign early, the Democrats gain control. While this scenario is unlikely, it is possible. This is why so much national attention is being focused on a race that until recently was considered a solid, safe red seat and not worth spending money on. 

I feel pretty confident that the TN-07 seat will stay Republican. With revelations that Behn supports sex change treatments for children, supports defunding the police, and hates Nashville, I think her chances of winning have decreased. If Democrats had chosen a more moderate candidate, I think the chances of flipping the seat would be much greater. 

Even if Democrats do not retake the House, a slimmer Republican majority means that it takes fewer disgruntled Republican House members to cause headaches for the Speaker. It means it is harder for the Speaker to hold up legislation that a large portion of the House wants to see the light of day. It takes fewer Republican defections for committees to conduct meaningful oversight. 

Top Stories

Why Dems Are Pouring Money Into the Tennessee 7th

by  Lauren Egan, The Bulwark, Nov. 23, 2025 - IT’S BEEN A GOOD MONTH for the Democratic party. Double-digit wins in the Virginia and New Jersey gubernatorial races, fractures within the Republican coalition over releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, and polls ....

The 7th is now reliably Republican; Trump carried it by 22 percentage points in 2024 and Green won his last two races by a similar margin. ...

In short, TN-7 is not exactly the place where the two political parties tend to fight it out, let alone spend meaningful sums of money. Yet that’s exactly what is happening in this special election.

Millions of dollars have poured into middle Tennessee in an attempt to tip the balance between Democrat Aftyn Behn, a progressive organizer and state representative, and Republican Matt Van Epps, the former Tennessee General Services commissioner.

... while it’s notable how much more bullish Democrats have gotten about their prospects, most party officials I spoke with (both in Tennessee and at national party organizations) think that Van Epps will ultimately win. It’s simple math. While Democrats tend to overperform in special elections and a Trump backlash is clearly brewing, a 22-point deficit is just a lot to overcome.

In private, Democratic officials tell me that they are hoping to see a single-digit loss. They believe even that would be enough to send a message that the political winds are at their backs, that Trump’s agenda is politically toxic, and that Democrats can seriously compete in red parts of the country that just a few weeks ago felt out of reach.

... Behn is running a campaign designed to turn out Democrats more than to make crosscurrent appeals to Republicans. That may work in a special election. But officials here think that such an approach would doom her in a regular election cycle, when Republican voters are more clued in and willing to show up. If Democrats want to be anything other than the party of highly educated people who show up in special elections, then they have to figure out how to win over more moderate and conservative voters.

...it is imperative for Democrats to find a formula that works. Behn may benefit from running in a special election—in which her party has routinely overperformed—but her success (or failure) is going to be closely studied for which voters are activated and why.

...Democrats in the state insist that a base-turnout strategy could work. In my conversation with Martin, he stated plainly that the race was “not about persuading voters, it’s about turning them out.” And at a canvass launch I attended last week, organizers for the Behn campaign told volunteers that they would be knocking only on the doors of Democratic voters and likely wouldn’t encounter any Republicans.

... Republicans have attempted to paint Behn as too liberal, resurfacing old podcast comments she made about policing and going after the work she did for the progressive grassroots group Indivisible. They’ve dubbed her the “AOC of Tennessee” and circulated clips of her calling Trump a “racist, white-supremacist bigot.”

There are some signals that Behn recognizes the risks and rewards of a base-turnout approach—and is trying to balance them. She has campaigned with progressive stars like Rep. Jasmine Crockett and activist David Hogg. But her buzziest campaign video does not even mention her party affiliation. When Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance in Nashville to encourage people to vote in the special election, it was hosted by the Tennessee Democratic Party, not Behn’s campaign. Harris, who had long planned to be in town for her book tour, never mentioned Behn by name and the two did not appear together. Behn left the rally to attend a fundraiser just a few minutes before the vice president arrived.

... The Behn model might be the smartest play for a special election, but the Democrats I spoke with warned that it was not how the party would unseat other Republicans in deeply red districts, like GOP Rep. Andy Ogles in Tennessee’s 5th—a race that the national Democratic party has already said they will spend money on next year.

“If Aftyn comes within 10 points, I absolutely think most Democrats in Tennessee will see this as ammunition to run further to the left in all races,” said a local elected official.

... Van Epps won a crowded Republican primary thanks to an endorsement from Trump, he’s done very little to highlight his MAGA credentials in the general election. In a recent TV ad, Van Epps doesn’t even mention he’s a Republican. (Read it all)

Top Stories