Friday, April 10, 2026

Trump, Tucker, Megan, Alex and Candace

by JIM GERAGHTY, National Review, Morning Jolt, April 10, 2026 - The president of the United States would like you to know that he no longer thinks highly of Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones:

They’re stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too! Look at their past, look at their record. They don’t have what it takes, and they never did! They’ve all been thrown off Television, lost their Shows, and aren’t even invited on TV because nobody cares about them, they’re NUT JOBS, TROUBLEMAKERS, and will say anything necessary for some “free” and cheap publicity. Now they think they get some “clicks” because they have Third Rate Podcasts, but nobody’s talking about them, and their views are the opposite of MAGA. . . .


.... Alex Jones being a nut job is . . . not really a surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention in the past . . . oh, couple decades or so? I suspect you have known this for so long, you can’t even remember if there was ever a time when you didn’t think Jones was crazy. (There apparently was a time when some people saw him as nutty but amusing and harmless; Jones makes a cameo appearance as a street preacher in the 2001 Richard Linklater animated film Waking Life; Linklater said years later that at the time, Jones was just a funny-crazy public-access TV host in Austin, Texas.)

And yet, unlike our president, I suspect you’ve never agreed to appear on his program. If Trump is irked that someone that he deems a “nut job” and “troublemaker” has the profile that he does . . . well, Mr. President, you helped elevate him. (We should also note that many mainstream media programs, convinced that they were rebutting and refuting Jones’s views also ended up unwittingly elevating him along the way.)

The rapid rise of Candace Owens reflected the fact that the conservative movement desperately wants to see more young people, minorities, and women join the movement, and thus many conservatives get extremely excited whenever a young minority woman comes along and appears to be saying the right things. Alas, the warning signs about Owens were there from the start. Way back in 2019, addressing an event in London, she offered an . . . unorthodox interpretation of World War II:

Whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler. . . . He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German.

That is . . . not really the core problem with Hitler. To paraphrase the late and dearly missed Norm Macdonald, I think the worst part was all the genocide, not the “dreams outside of Germany.” Yes, the annexation of other nations was quite bad and makes the list, but I suspect that when going through “the problems with Hitler,” you must work your way down a long list of horrible large-scale crimes against humanity until you get to Hitler’s yearning for linguistic conformity.

You know who concluded, “I’ve studied a lot of history, plus I had family that was there, I don’t think Hitler was a good guy”? Alex Jones.

In the years since, Owens did not get any saner, nor is there much evidence that she’s learned much since her denunciation of Hitler as a globalist. And yet, once again, President Trump agreed to an interview with her and helped elevate her profile.

As for Tucker Carlson, the question “What happened to Carlson?” has been echoing around the right-of-center world for years. Many speculate that what we have seen in recent years reflects the real, probably long-repressed Carlson, unconstrained by cable news television show producers, editors, network lawyers, corporate programming heads, and so on.

There’s no one around to tell Carlson, “Hey, a softball interview with Nick Fuentes isn’t such a good idea,” or “No, the U.S. should not have allied with Hitler during World War II,” or “No, Winston Churchill was not the chief villain during World War II,” nor is the standard of living of Russians better than that of Americans.

...Anyway, Carlson has interviewed Trump many times, both on his Fox News program and at least three times on his post-Fox podcast. Once again, Trump is fuming about a media personality that he helped elevate. Trump even had Carlson speak at the 2024 Republican National Convention.

Megyn Kelly . . . eh, I guess I can’t make fun of anyone who’s ever appeared on her program, as I myself appeared a bunch of times, in better, saner days. I don’t know why she’s going on about Mark Levin’s genitalia. I am sure that Levin is quite angry with Kelly, and vice versa. I do not think that Levin would like to have Kelly killed, as she recently asserted.

. ...  if President Trump is really that upset that he constantly feels betrayed by individuals who he thought were his allies and friends . . . maybe he needs to be more discerning in who he considers allies and friends.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, April 09, 2026

Megan Kelly Turns on Trump:


by Rod Williams, April 9, 2026- Megan Kelly is another pundit who has turned on Trump for his threat to commit genocide against Iran. 

Like Tucker, she is a significant voice in Trump world. The hardcore Trump cult members will never be persuaded that Trump is wrong about anything. Those without a bad case of Trump Devotion Syndrome or Trump Delusion Syndrome may be persuadable. They are much more likely to be persuaded by Tucker Carlson or Megan Kelly than by someone like Rachel Maddow or other lefty pundit. This podcast needs to be shared. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tucker Carlson Turns on Trump in Powerful Denunciation of Trump's Easter F-bomb-Laden Rant.


by Rod Williams, April 9, 2026 - I am happy to see war among MAGA. When the most horrible people turn on each other, it gives me joy. 

Unless one purposely avoids knowing what goes on in the world, one probably knows about Trump's profanity-laden Easter Truth Social post in which he dropped the F-bomb, threatened war crimes, and praised Allah.

Trump's Easter post certainly was offensive. I, however, have kind of become numb to the offensive things Trump says and does, and can no longer be shocked. 

If I had woken up this morning and learned Trump had dropped a nuclear bomb on Iran, I would be outraged, fearful, sad, and would experience other emotions, but would not be shocked. 

If, as we approach the mid-term elections, Trump declares that several American cities are in a state of insurrection and therefore we must suspend the elections, I would be alarmed and outraged but would not be shocked. 

Given Trump's coup attempt, his abusive use of the pardon power, his crooked business dealings, his trampling of the Constitution, denial of due process, sending innocent people to torture prisons, his continuing cover up of the Epstein files, his threats to use force to annex portions of allied countries, and his unleashing of armed paramilitary thugs to murder protestors on the streets of American cities, Trump's Easter rant was not the most outrageous or offensive thing he has ever done. 

Given all that Trump has done that is offensive, I am somewhat surprised that the Trump F-bomb Easter post is the thing that causes elements of his coalition to turn on him. Candace Owens has turned on Trump. Marjorie Taylor Green had already turned on Trump but found the Easter F-bomb post particularly offensive. Alex Jones has turned on Trump over that post and the war, and a bunch of other MAGA influencers have done so.

Some of those who turned on Trump are so marginalized that I think they are irrelevant. You have to really be on the far edge of the political spectrum to care what conspiracy theorist Alex Jones thinks. It was Alex Jones who alleged the Sandy Hook school shooting was a red flag operation and the dead children were really actors. I doubt Alex Jones influence ranges far beyond the weirdest of people

As for Marjorie Taylor Greene, she is out of office and slipping into irrelevance. While I am glad to see her turn on Trump, she seems to have a screw loose and may be crazier than Trump. After she attributed California wildfires to Jewish space lasers, I think her credibility has been diminished. Some of the other MAGA influencers who have turned on Trump have little influence.  

Candace Owens is a major public figure and she has turned o n Trump. However, if you have followed her fixation on the Charlie Kirk assassination, she has woven such a complicated tale that she seems unhinged. Her conspiracy theory involves the French Foreign Legion, Kirk's widow Erica, the Jews, Israel, an Egyptian military contractor, Calvary Church, the CIA, other people in Turning Point USA, and various others. I can't keep track. I assume people still watch her for the entertainment value, but I suspect the number of people she actually influences is quite limited. 

Tucker turning on Trump is different. It is significant. Tucker Carlson is the most influential pundit in America.  Neither the big legacy newspapers, 60 Minutes, PBS Newshour, This Week, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNow, CNN, nor Fox have the reach of Tucker Carlson. Also, Tucker has been one of Trump's most vocal supporters. Sure, Calson is a propagandist for Putin and platforms neo-Nazis, but most of the time, he sounds reasonable. He spreads conspiracy theories, but for the most part, he sounds rational. Of course, there was the claim by Carlson that he was physically attacked and "mauled" by a demon while sleeping in his bed, leaving him with bleeding claw marks on his ribs and shoulder. Other than this "demonic encounter," Carlson sounds relatively sane.

Carlson turning on Trump should matter. I wonder if it will. I wonder how much. Many Trump loyalists are like cult members who will follow the leader anywhere. They will do a 180 on free trade, on the importance of alliances, on support for the First Amendment, and will excuse immoral behavior that they once would have condemned. Many have "drank the Kool-Aid." Others, I suspect, however, still have a modicum of human decency and can still reason. Maybe some of those will be persuaded by Tucker Carlson's arguments. 

Tucker Carlson's denunciation of Trump is powerful. It needs to be shared.



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, April 07, 2026

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Bill Requiring Citizenship Database Checks for Voter Registration Heads to Governor’s Desk

 The bill would require verification of citizenship status in Tennessee at the point of voter registration through a federal database with reports of high error rates

by Anita Wadhwani, Tennessee Lookout, April 7, 2026 - A bill authorizing county election administrators to verify Tennessee voters’ immigration status through a federal database is on its way to the governor’s desk after Senate Republicans on Monday voted to approve the measure. 

The bill (SB2204/HB2185) by Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson of Franklin and House Leader William Lamberth of Sumner County, both Republicans, is dependent on whether the United States Department of Homeland Security makes the data available to state election officials via a secure web service known as the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE).

Current law already requires voters to attest to their citizenship status when registering to vote: the state then verifies citizenship using state and federal data sources.

Johnson said the bill was intended to intercept potentially fraudulent registration at the point of voter registration.

“This bill would allow election officials to use SAVE data during the initial application review,” Johnson said. 

Sen. Raumesh Akbari, a Memphis Democrat, cited high error rates that have occurred in verifying citizenship status through the SAVE system in the past.

The system is routinely used to verify citizenship eligibility for a variety of public services with a low error rate. But in states such as Texas, which has deployed the SAVE checks for voter registration, some county election officials mistakenly flagged voters as noncitizens upwards at high rates, up to 14% of the time, according to reporting by Pro Publica and the Texas Tribune.

 Johnson said existing election law already provides potential voters denied registration with an appeals process.

“You can bring appropriate documentation for consideration by the election administrator, election coordinator, so all of those provisions will remain in place,” Johnson said. “So someone is falsely deemed to be ineligible to vote under this system, they would have a mechanism to appeal and provide the necessary documentation,” he said. 

The bill, already in the House, was passed on a party-line 27-6 vote Monday in the Senate. 

If signed into law by Gov. Bill Lee, the bill’s implementation would remain contingent on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security working with Tennessee’s election officials to “create a secure, electronic portal through which each county administrator of elections may access information” by 2028 to verify citizenship status.

Separately the similarly-named federal Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act would require states such as Tennessee to create mechanisms to verify immigration status upon voter registration. The measure, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives earlier this year, requires voters to provide proof of citizenship at the point of voter registration. The U.S. Senate has yet to take up a vote on the measure. 

#

For more on this topic, see:


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, April 06, 2026

Thank You for Reading and Sharing

My blog reached a new level of viewership. It exceeded one million views in the last thirty days. Thank you for reading and sharing. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories