Below are the council members who voted against raising your taxes.
They voted against the Mendez substitute budget which would have increased
the property tax rate by 50 cents or 16%.
A tax increase would have not only been paid by homeowners but renters
would have likely been impacted to a greater extend since multi-family
properties are assessed at a higher rate and higher taxes on these
properties would have been passed on to renters in the form of higher
rents.
You may want to thank your councilman for his vote. You may contact any of these members by clicking on their name and it will
take you to a page with a link to their email address and other contact
information.
If you are unsure who your council member is follow this link and to the right of the page see, "Council District Lookup."
Below are the council members who voted in favor of raising your taxes. They supported the Mendez substitute budget which would have increased the property tax rate by 50 cents or 16%.
A tax increase would have not only been paid by homeowners but renters would have likely been impacted to a greater extend since multi-family properties are assessed at a higher rate and higher taxes on these properties would have been passed on to renters in the form of higher rents.
To contact any of these members you can click on their name and it will take you to a page with a link to their email address and other contact information.
If you are unsure who your council member is follow this link and to the right of the page see, "Council District Lookup."
By now everyone who cares knows the council passed a budget that does not raise taxes. This meeting however is worth watching because it is one of the best meeting I have ever seen. I thought the arguments were well made even when I didn't agree with the position of the speakers. Also, the Council was attempting to do something never done before and that is to raise taxes when the mayor's office did not propose raising taxes, so that made it interesting.
If you are actually going to watch the whole meeting, you better get a drink and a snack and be prepared to take a bathroom break. At six and half hours long, this is one of the longest meeting I ever remember. I watched part of it in real time as it occurred and then watched most of the video. I skipped ahead in the parts where I knew nothing important was happening and watched parts of it in double speed. Most of the meeting is devoted to the budget. Below is a summary of the meeting.
To access the agenda, the Council staff agenda analysis and my commentary on the agenda, follow this link and this link.
Following the prayer and pledge is a ceremonial presentation honoring Franklin Road Academy's wrestling program coach. The Council gets down to business at timestamp 16 in the video. The first item is election of a person to the Industrial Development Board. There are two candidates and a nominating speech for each and then the council votes, electingQuin E. Segall. I don't know anything about either candidate and had no preference.
Following that election, the Council votes to confirm mayoral appointments to boards and commissions. There is no discussion or surprises. This is concluded at timestamp 32. The next item is public hearings on three resolutions all asking for an exemption from the minimum distance requirements for obtaining a beer permit. No one speaks on any of them and they pass.
Resolutions of interest
Resolution RS2018-1253 extends the duration of the water and sewer extendable commercial paper program. I
do not know if this is prudent or not but it sounds suspect. It is deferred one meeting.
Resolution RS2018-1262 appropriates $3.5 million from the undesignated fund balances of the MNPS General Purpose Fund to Metro Schools. This was necessary to finish the current budget year, which ends on June 30. It is unusual. It means the School system spend more money than was appropriated. Director of Schools Shawn Joseph explained this was due to unexpected administrative expenses. To read The Tennessean's coverage of this issue, follow this link. This resolution passes on a voice vote.
Resolution RS2018-1263 is a resolution requesting the Tennessee General Assembly to introduce and
enact legislation to allow for online publication, instead of
newspaper
publication, when public notices are required. Now, these public notices are published in publications that no one
reads, that is just full of notices. The committee voted against it 8 to zero and the sponsor deferred it indefinitely. I do not know the argument against it as I did not watch the committee meeting but on its face this seemed like a good idea.
All bills on first reading are lumped together and pass by a single vote without discussion as is the norm.
Bills on Second Reading.
Bill BL2018-1189
would require Metro to make an even greater effort to make sure some
Metro business goes to minority contractors when Metro has projects to
put out for bid. The staff analysis says Metro legal has expressed
concern that the bill may contain unconstitutional race and gender
based preferences and is inconsistent with the current framework
of the Procurement Non-Discrimination Program. It is deferred one meeting.
Bill BL2018-1200 would require that if a hotels or roominghouses accept cash payment,
they must also accept at least one other form of payment such as check
or credit cards. I seldom carry cash and would find it inconvenient if I
tried to do business with an entity that was cash-only, but why not let
the market work this out? Why must the government try to micromanage
every aspect of commerce and our lives? It is deferred one meeting.
Bill BL2018-1201 would tighten animal control regulations.
Now, you are not supposed to leave your pooch out if the heat index
will be above 95. This lowers it to 85. Animal Control says to enforce this will take more
people, space, and equipment and cost $472,617. This is deferred one meeting. Bill BL2018-1202 are proposed new rules for scooter prompted by the arrival of
Bird Scooter here in Nashville. It would require new fees
including a fee of $40 per scooter. This is deferred one meeting.
Bill BL2018-1203 also deals with scooters, in-line skates, and roller skates by removing the requirement
for wrist guards, elbow pads, and kneepads and updating audio device
references.. This is deferred one meeting.
Bill BL2018-1207would direct the Purchasing Agent to terminate Contract Purchase Agreement 338266, a project management services agreement between Commonwealth Development Group, Inc. and the Metropolitan Government. Commonwealth Development is the company that did work on the MLS stadium without a contract to do that work and without money appropriated to do that work. The work was authorized by Metro Chief Operating Officer Rich Riebeling. Commonwealth was paid out of a Bridgestone Arena fund. The Metro Sports Authority, which operates the arena, was unaware of the spending. This incident let to a deeper look the work of Commonwealth and some in the Council became dissatisfied. The owner of Commonwealth and Rich Riebelng are close friends and questions were raised about that cozy relationship and how Commonwealth got Metro business and how much they are paid and the provision of free office space to the company. There is less than a year left on the current contract and this bill was withdrawn. Steve Glover says the trust factor has been eroded.
The Operating Budget,Bill BL2018-1184 and related items.
The lengthy deliberations on the operating budget starts at timestamp 1:22:17. Speaker Pro Tem lays out the process and possible outcomes at the start of the discussion.
There were three possible budgets that could have passed; the mayor's budget, the Vercher substitute or the Mendes substitute. The mayor's budget did not raise taxes and did not fund the promised employee cost of living pay raise or give the schools their budget request. The Vercher substitute did not hike taxes but shifted money, giving $2 million more to schools. The Mendes substitute increased the tax rate 50 cents or 16%, would have generated $150 million, fully funded the COLA for metro employees and fully funded the schools request.
One should realized the budget process to know the limitations of what the Council could do. We have a strong mayor form of local government. The deck is stacked against the Council. When it comes to the budget, if the Counciil fails to pass a budget the mayor's budget becomes law without council action. It takes 21 votes to pass a budget. If the mayor should veto the budget presented by the Council, then it takes 27 votes to override a veto. So, the Mendes budget had an uphill clime to be passed. Should the Mendes budget have passed, then been vetoed by the mayor, which we can assume he would do, and then the Council failed to override, then the mayor budget would have been the official budget. There would not have been an opportunity to go back and pass the Vercher budget.
For those who won't to get in the tall weeds of the budget, see Citizens' Guide to the Metro Budget. If watching this lengthy budget debate does not satisfy your desire to understand the budget issues, you may want to watch the Budget and Finance Committee deliberations on the budget which you can watch at this link. Vercher is called on first. As chairman of the Budget and Finance Committee she is the sponsor of the mayor's budget. As chairman, she oversaw the work of the committee that created the substitute and the substitute that was the result of committee work becomes her bill and she moves to substitute the mayor's budget. The Vercher budget is substituted for the mayor's budget by a vote of 34 to 4.
Next, various amendments are voted upon. Most of the amendments shifted some money from one department to another. All failed but three. One of the amendments shifted a little money. Another, which I am pleased to see, created a Blue Ribbon Commission, "to identify governmentinefficiencies, practices, transfer payments, third party payments and subsidies with the targeted goal of achieving budgetary cost savings of $20 million in annual savings." I hope this is successful and am optimistic that some saving will be realized by this commission.
Another, was an amendment to substitute one piece of property for another as one of the properties that will be sold to generate money as part of the city's revenue to fund this budget. A piece of property on Woodycrest used to park school buses was substituted for the Edgehill Community Memorial Park that was listed as a piece of property to be sold. I am pleased by this amendment. We should not be selling off city parks.
Next, Councilman Mendes was recognized and he moved to substitute the Vercher substitute with his substitute which raised taxes. After considerable debate his budget was rejected by a vote of 19 in favor to 20 opposed. The vote was 19 to 19 before the tie was broken by the Speaker Pro Tem Councilman Sheri Weiner. Back on the budget ordinance which is the Vercher substitute, that bill is adopted. There is some very good debate.
After the budget, Bill BL2018-1185 which is the tax levy which did not increase taxes is passed. Following that the Council acts on three resolutions that address the pay plan. If the pay plan had not been adjusted, then to fund the employees pay increases approved in a pay plan last year, a lot of other employees would have lost their job.
by Rod Williams - Diane Black's proposed solution for Nashville area traffic woes is to double-stack the three interstates in Nashville and complete he Interstate 840 north loop. Her three opponents in the race for governor take a different approach. Bill Lee and Randy Boyd have said technology is the answer and Beth Harwell has said solving Nashville's traffic problem is basically a local issue.
As reported in The Tennessean, Bill Lee says, "I’m a businessman. I run a corporation. We look to technology to solve
some of the greatest challenges in our society, and five years ago we
never would have imagined you would push an app on your phone and get in
the car with a perfect stranger and drive away, but technology changes
the future."
Lee said the state should focus on smart traffic lights, private-sector ride-share programs and
technology to further utilize the state's roadways, such as rarely
enforced HOV lanes.
Randy Boyd said, "When we look at the solution, it needs to be a regional solution, but
also I think the thing we are not looking at enough is technology. There’s some new technology investments that I believe are gonna
help relieve a lot of the problems that we have. It’s not just about
spending our way out."
I agree more with Lee and Boyd than I do Diane Black on this issue, with the exception of building the northern part of the I-840 loop. Building the I-840 loop would divert a certain amount of traffic from the north that is headed either west or east at Nashville. I do not know if that is a significant amount of traffic or not, but if traffic studies show it is, then that northern loop should be build. I am not sold on the idea of double decking the interstates. I do not think it necessary and it is quality of life issue. Wider interstates or double decked interstates create a more stressful environment and are ugly.
I am convinced that para-transit, express bus service and technology can solve our traffic problems. We do not need rail or interstate expansion except in certain locations to correct bottlenecks. For more on my thoughts on traffic see this link. For the Tennessean's story on the position of candidates for governor on this issue of transportation, follow this link.
by Rod Williams, June 20, 1918 - After a lengthy discussion in which numerous Council members spoke for or against the Mendes amendment to the Vercher sponsored substitute budget, the Mendes amendment failed. That amendment would have hiked the tax rate by 5O cents or 16%. It would have generated $150 million which would have funded a cost-of-living pay increase for Metro employees and it would have fully funded the school board's
funding request. The vote was taken at 12:33 AM. The vote was 19 to 19. President por tem Sheri Weiner who only votes in the event of a tie voted "no," killing the Mendes tax hike budget proposal making the final vote 19 in favor and 20 opposed
Back on the Vercher no tax hike substitute bill, the Council voted in favor 34 to 4.
For more details, and a list of how council members voted, see a future blog post.
The Tennessean, July 19, 2018 - The city diverted $9.3 million of property taxes from schools to pay off redevelopment loans — for downtown hotels, luxury condos and other projects.
Such diversions have occurred for decades, but in the past two years they've grown quickly. This fiscal year's amount was about $1 million more than expected. (link)
Rod Williams comments: To be fair, some of the development would probably not have occurred without incentives but one cannot say how much. Still, way to much money is going to developers rather than the city's needs.
In a surprise move the Budget and Finance Committee of the Metro Council voted to recommend a tax hike budget. The budget that was expected to be the Council budget that had been developed earlier by the committee shifted some funding but did not raise taxes. That no tax hike budget was sponsored by the Committee chairman Tanaka Vercher.
The tax hike budget was sponsored by At-large Councilman Bob Mendes and barely won approval by the Committee by a vote of 7 to 6. Under the Mendes budget the tax rate for
most property owners would increase by 50 cents which amounts to a 16%
property tax hike. That tax hike would generate $150 million which would fund a cost-of-living pay increase for Metro employees and it would fully fund the school board's
funding request.
Confusingly, the Council also recommended the no tax hike Vercher budget by a recommendation of 9 to 3. So, the Committee is recommending both budgets which means the Committee is not making a clear recommendation. With no clear recommendation from the committee, we probably will see a floor fight on Tuesday night. For more details, see The Tennessean's coverage of this development at this link.
by Rod Williams - By the way city officials calculate the budget, there is a budget shortage of $34 million. That is to say the city will realize $34 million less in revenue than the city initially thought they would have. $26 million of that is due to successful challenges, mostly by large commercial interest, to the city's recent property appraisals. Another $8 million is due to the city getting less funding from the State for schools due to declining school enrollment.
Despite the city's population growth, there are fewer children being enrolled in Metro Schools. either because there is demographic shift and there are fewer school age children or because more parents are sending their kids to private schools or homeschooling. It is probably some of both. One would think with fewer children to educate that would be a budget plus. One would think with fewer students to educate, that would save the city money. The State does not cover the full cost of educating children so it is hard to understand why having fewer students is a hardship rather than a benefit. If you think like that then you are thinking like a business man or someone who manages a household budget. That is not the way bureaucrats or the school board or Mayor Bailey thinks about it.
In any event, these two factors constitute a $34 million shortage. In developing the budget, the
anticipated revenues and anticipated expenses have to match. Most of the revenue comes from property tax and sales tax but there are also many other fees that contribute to the revenue side. Everything from parking tickets to fees for rezoning property and city auto stickers and dozens of other fees contribute to the city's revenue. In the Mayor's $2.23 billion budget $23 million in revenue is anticipated to come from the sale of three city properties that have been declared surplus. This is one-time money and it is not wise to depend on one-time money for continuing expenses, but that is what the city is doing. This same revenue is also counted in the Council's substitute budget proposed by the Budget and Finance committee.
It is by no means a certainty that these property sales will take place. The three properties are in Edgehill, Green Hills and Charlotte Avenue near Sylvan Park. There are any number of things that could stop these sales. While I do not know the specifics of these three parcels, rezoning could be an obstacle. Often for a prime piece of property to get top dollar it must be rezoned. Often the completion of the sale is contingent upon the rezoning taking place. Rezoning is never a certainty.
There is already serious opposition to the sale of the Edgehill property. This property is a park that adjoins the Edgehill Apartments public housing project. It is the former site of the home of African-American folk artist William Edmondson. He was the son of slaves who became a self-taught artist and was the first African-American artist to be given his own show
at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. His art has been featured in the Smithsonian American
Art Museum.
The Edgehill community has a long history of activism. The Rev. Bill Barnes who was an organizing force in the community pastured the Edgehill Methodist Church from 1966 until his retirement in 1996. He was liberal advocate for affordable housing and other issues affecting the Edgehill community. The Edgehill community is accustomed to fighting city hall. A few years ago when the city entered into an agreement with Belmont University to share Rose Park with Belmont University in exchange for Belmont's investment in the park, the community unsuccessfully fought the deal. It did happen but it took a while and there were lots of protest and a lawsuit before Belmont won that battle.
In the last year, the Edgehill community became a leading voice opposing the redevelopment of property that adjoins Fort Negley that was the former home of the Nashville Sounds' Greer Stadium. Fort Negley is near the Edgehill Community. Fort Negley was build by freed slaves forced into labor by the occupying Union army. Many Blacks endured terrible hardship building the fort and many died. Many in the Black community found it offensive that this site of significance to African-Americans was to be redeveloped rather than incorporated into the Fort Negley Park. When Mayor Briley became mayor, the plan to redevelop the Greer stadium site was abandoned.
The point of the above discussion of the Edgehill community is to say that if the community wants to keep the city from selling off the Edgehill Memorial Gardens Park, the community will fight. They will not just roll over and play dead. The community has already had at least one community meeting to organize for the purpose of saving the park (link). While I think Nashville does too many things, I like our park system. As Nashville grows, we need more green space not less.
In addition to the political activist of Edgehill, I am sure there are many people like me who will side with those who think selling off park property to balance the budget is not a good idea. I signed petitions and advocated saving Fort Negley and reincorporating the Greer site back into Fort Negley Park and I feel sure I will support saving Edgehill Memorial Gardens. Councilman Colby Sledge who represents the Edgehill area has already come out in opposition to selling off the park.
In stead of making the budget balance by counting one-time money from the sale of pubic lands when that sale looks very doubtful, the city should cut the budget. There is plenty of waste, corruption, and unnecessary spending to cut to make it balance. Also, using one-time money to balance the budget just sets us up for a certain tax increase next year. It is time to get serious about cutting expenses.
For additional source material for this story see the following links: here, here, here, here.
By Rod Williams - The
Metro Council will meet Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 6:30 PM in the
Council chamber at the Metro Courthouse. Here is a link to the Council agenda
and the staff analysis
for those who want to watch the Council meeting and follow along.
Below is a summary of what is on the agenda. The most important item is the annual operating budget and I have discussed that in a separate post at this link. Elections and Confirmation
There is an election to fill one vacancy on the Industrial Development Board. This Board controls a lot of money and hands out corporate welfare by giving sweetheart deals to favored companies. Another way of saying it is they incentivize companies to locate in Nashville by giving them preferential treatment. It develops property then leases it
to businesses. Since the property remains the
property of Metro Government and thus exempt from property taxes,
companies awarded these deals do not have to pay property taxes but
instead pay "payment in lieu of taxes" or PILOT, which is often much
less than they would pay in taxes. Also, the IDB may do the same for
developers of affordable housing. While the public knows little about how the board operates and doesn't care who sits on the board, some business interest lobby hard to see their favorite candidate sit on the board. The two candidates are Tequila Johnson and Quin E. Segall. I have no knowledge of either.
There are 13 mayoral appointments to Boards and Commission before the Council for confirmation. Usually, these are confirmed without controversy, discussion or dissension.
There are three resolutions on Public Hearing all asking for an exemption from the minimum distance requirements for obtaining a beer permit.
Resolutions: There are 18 of them. Most are routine things like accepting grants and settling lawsuits out of court. Here are the ones of interest:
Resolution RS2018-1253 extends the extends the duration of the water and sewer extendable commercial paper program. I do not know if this is prudent or not and I have not watched the Budget and Finance Committee meeting where this may have been discussed, but it does raise a red flag. It appears to me that instead of paying debts when they become due we get extensions. In a household this would be a sign of a household in financial difficulty. Any insight as to the prudence of this action from a knowledgeable person would be welcome.
Resolution RS2018-1262 appropriates $3,500,000 from the undesignated fund balances of the MNPS General Purpose Fund to Metro Schools.
Resolution RS2018-1263 is a resolution requesting the Tennessee General Assembly to introduce and
enact legislation to allow for online publication, instead of newspaper
publication, when public notices are required. This makes sense to me. Now, these public notices are published in publications that no one reads, that is just full of notices.
Bills on Introduction and First Reading: There are 10 bills on
first reading. Bills on First Reading are normally considered as a group
and are seldom discussed. First reading
is a formality that allows the bill to be considered. Unless a bill is
ridiculously atrocious it should be passed on first reading. Bills are
not assigned to committee or analyzed by council staff until after they
have passed first reading. I have not carefully reviewed the bills on
first reading, but will before second reading. There is one bill on
First Reading that is very significant.Bill BL2018-1205 would save the fairgrounds by prohibiting the giveaway of the tea acres
that is slated to be given to the developers of the planned soccer
stadium. This is a good bill. I don't think anyone would try to kill it
on first reading but they may.
Bills on Second Reading: There are 27 bills on Second Reading. These are the ones of importance.
Bill BL2018-1189 would require Metro to make an even greater effort to make sure some Metro business goes to minority contractors when Metro has projects to put for bid. The staff analysis says Metro legal has expressed concern that the bill may contain unconstitutional race and gender based preferences and is inconsistent with the current framework of the Procurement Non-Discrimination Program.
Bill BL2018-1200 would require that if a hotels or roominghouses accept cash payment, they must also accept at least one other form of payment such as check or credit cards. I seldom carry cash and would find it inconvenient if I tried to do business with an entity that was cash-only, but why not let the market work this out. Why must the government try to micromanage every aspect of commerce and our lives?
Bill BL2018-1201 would tighten animal control regulations. Now, you are not supposed to leave your pooch out if the heat index will be above 95. This lowers it to 85. Why? Lots of people work outside with a heat index of 95. At one time dogs lived in unairconditioned houses with their masters. We did not always have air conditioning and animals survived. Animal Control says to enforce this will take more people, space, and equipment and cost $472,617. That is the way government grows. An extra $472,617 hear and an extra $472,617 there and pretty soon you are talking about real money and have to raise taxes. Bill BL2018-1202 are proposed new rules for scooter prompted by the arrival of
Bird Scooter here in Nashville. It would require new fees including a fee of $40 per scooter. If the Bird people say they can live with this, I would support it, but I think it is ridiculous that Metro tries to hinder or stop every new economic innovation. Bird Scooters are undocked and an app on you phone can find the closest one, you can activate it by use of your phone app, ride it to your destination and then leave it. This could contribute to Nashville's mobility and be another transit option, yet Metro is fighting this innovative service.
Bills on Third Reading: There are seven. One is the Metro annual operating budget which I have reported on in another post. Here are the other ones of interest.
Substitute BL2018-1139 (as amended)approves the Donelson Transit-Oriented Redevelopment Plan.
There is a new authority given to cities to plan, facilitate and guide
develop around transit stops to encourage a certain kind of development
around those stops and to give cities the authority to issue Tax
Increment Financing bonds for improvements in the designated area. This
would be the first time this authority has been used. This designation
would apply to the Donelson stop on The Nashville Star line. This bill does a lot. There is a
lot of detail in the staff analysis for those who want to know more. I
have no problem with this concept but think it might go too far in trying to micro manage development. Previous I had expressed a concern
is that this might
confer the power of eminent domain to MDHA for use in this area. I have
since spoken to the sponsor and have been assured this is not the case.
With that assurance, while I still have reservations about the reach of this bill, on balance I think it is a beneficial bill.
Bill BL2018-1185is the Metro tax levy, since the proposed Metro budget does not call for a tax increase, the tax levy would not change unless Councilman Mendes' bill passes which calls for a tax increase.
To watch the
Council meeting, you can go to the courthouse and watch the
meeting in person or you can watch the broadcast live at Metro Nashville Network's Government TV on Nashville's Comcast Channel 3 and AT&T's U-verse 99 and it is streamed live at the Metro Nashville Network's livestream site and you can watch it live on Roku. You can catch the meeting the next day (or the day after the next) on the Metro YouTube channel.
If can stand the suspense and just wait, I will post the video on
this blog the day after or the day after that and provide commentary.
By Rod Williams - The
Metro Council will meet Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 6:30 PM in the
Council chamber at the Metro Courthouse. Here is a copy of the Council agenda
and the staff analysis
for those who want to watch the Council meeting and follow along.
There are several important items on the agenda but by far the most
important is the operating budget. The Operating Budget,Bill BL2018-1184
This
bill is on third and final reading. Should the process of passing a
budget get bogged down for some reason and not pass tonight, the Council
would have to hold a special session between now and the end of the
month. If the Council does not pass a budget, the mayor's budget
becomes law without council action.
The mayor's budget is what is initially before the Council. This is a $2.23 billion dollar budget. The
current Fiscal Year 2018 budget is for $2.21 billion. The mayor’s
proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2019 represents an overall
increase of $20.4 million. This year's budget does not call for a tax
increase. The budget is said to be "short" $34
million due to $26 million less being generated in property tax
revenues than anticipated, primarily due to large companies successfully challenging
their Metro tax appraisal, and $8 million less being received from the
State to support Metro schools, as a result of declining enrollment. For a more detailed explanation of what is in the budget see the staff analysis. To become an expert on the Metro budget, see Citizens' Guide to the Metro Budget. Two
areas most impacted by what s perceived to be a budget shortage is
Metro Schools and a promised Metro employee Cost of Living pay
increase. The schools asked for $44.7 million additional in this years budget and the mayors budget only gives them $5 million additional.
An area of concern to me is that the budget under funds the various reserve funds. This is not prudent money management and this action along any other bad economic news could impact Nashville's bond rating.
The
process of approving the budget is that the mayor first holds budget
"discussions" with department heads and their top staff who make a pitch
for the funding they want. The mayor and his staff estimate the city's
anticipated revenue and the mayor's office then develops a budget which
is presented to the Metro Council.
The Budget and Finance Committee
then holds earnings on the budget where each department head and their
top assistants appear before the Committee and make the case for their
budget. If they feel the major cut their budget request too much, they
appeal to the Council to increase their funding. The Budget and Finance
Committee then tweaks the mayors budget and shifts some money around
and this product is then presented to the Council as the "substitute"
budget.
The substitute budget does not call for a tax increase either. The substitute budget tweaks the
mayor's budget by cutting a little hear and there that total $2 million
and gives that money to Metro Schools. Out of a $2.23 billion budget that
is not much. Hardest hit in the substitute is the city's Music and Entertainment
Economic Development initiative which lost $1 million. $300,000 was taken
from the mayor's office budget smaller amounts from other departments. For The Tennessean's report on
this story, follow this link.
The
substitute maintains the cities commitment to the Barnes Fund for
Affordable Housing but moves to fund it contingent upon revenue
generated from the sale of two pieces of surplus properties. One of
those surplus pieces of property is a park in the Edgehill area and this has already generated stiff opposition.
Once
the motion to substitute is approved the budget is then often called
"the Council's budget" as opposed to "the mayor's budget." Once the
motion to substitute is accepted then that is the bill before
the Council which may be debated. Probably their will be no debate on
the motion to substitute. Once the substitute motion is passed
Councilman Bob Mendes is going to move to amend the substitute with a
substitute which calls for a .50 cent tax hike. Not that it matters a lot but the parliamentary procedure could be that Mendes opposes the Budget and Finance Committee substitute and argues for his own proposal at that point.
The Mendes fifty cent tax hike
would generate about $150 million in new taxes. This would fund the
schools request and the COLA pay increases. I adamantly oppose
increasing taxes and instead think we should cut waste, corruption,
inefficiency, corporate welfare and unnecessary spending. Expect some
lively debate. Mendes has four cosponsors for his bill and the
influential progressive organization NOAH has endorsed his plan and The
Tennessean has endorsed a tax increase.
Despite
the support for a tax increase from some council members and powerful
allies, I suspect the Mendes amendment will fail. I have no inside
knowledge but anticipate the Mendes proposal to get about ten votes.
After the failure of the Mendes amendment, Council will then be back to
considering an up or down vote on the substitute budget. This
is something that most citizens and I suspect even some members of the
Council do not understand. A "no" vote on the Council substitute has the
effect of being a "yes" vote for the mayor's budget due to that is the
way the Charter designs it. If the Council substitute fails then the
mayor;s budget is the budget.
As the author of A Disgruntled Republican I often post items which I think may be of interest to the conservative, Republican, libertarian or the greater community. Posting of a press release or an announcement of an event does not necessarily indicate an endorsement. Rod
Posts
