Writing in today's Tennessean, immigration control advocate Donna Locke had me nodding my head in agreement and saying, "I glad someone is saying that." This is the first sentence of her essay that elicited my positive response:
In response to recent reporting and commentary, it's worth noting that
our country now contains a multitude of people devoted to erasing all
distinctions between illegal aliens and legal immigrants and between
non-citizens and citizens.
She is exactly right. In newspapers and radio and TV reports, legal and illegal immigrants are lumped together and simply called "immigrants." There ought to be a distinction. I do not believe the erasing of the distinction is without intent. The intent is to change the way we think about the issue. It is part of the liberal agenda. Not that I think mainstream media people get their marching orders daily from a secret bunker in the basement of the New York Times, but the groupthink of liberalism causes some words to fall out of fashion. Politically correct people just do not use certain terms and one of them is "illegal alien" or "illegal immigrant."
Using the term "illegal alien" is like using the term "Negro;" it is just something that enlighten educated sensitive people do not do. It is the way "gay" has replaced homosexual. Journalist, I think, see it as their job to influence the way people think about things. They see it as their job to make people better. Using the term "illegal alien" is sort of like calling an unwed mother an "unwed mother" rather than a "single mother." It is impolite and by changing the terminology, the way people think about things can be changed. The closest mainstream media people can come to drawing a distinction between legal and illegal immigrants is in using the term "undocumented immigrant," and they only use that term reluctantly when necessary to understand the content of the story.
After eliciting my head nodding agreement in the first sentence, Ms Locke started to lose me in the second sentence when she wrote:
We see every conceivable effort to hide and deny the words "illegal" and
"criminal" in regard to foreigners who entered our country without our
government's permission or remained here after their legal visas
expired.
She then went on to say:
As for attempts to paint illegal aliens as noncriminals, illegal entry
and visa overstay are criminal, deportable offenses, and U.S.
immigration courts can put these offenders into detention (prison) and
sentence them to serve time till they're deported.
Calling all illegal aliens "criminals," is as offensive and agenda driven as is erasing the distinction between legal and illegal immigrants. By labeling all illegal aliens as criminals, it puts in the same category those who simply over stayed a visa with
those who are M-13 gang members or rapist. It is an agenda driven
attempt to demonize all illegal aliens and influence the way we think about them. Actually, illegal aliens commit less crime than the average American. This is fact and one can look it up.
What is a criminal? If a friend said of a mutual acquaintance, "Well, you know he is a criminal." I would think the person had committed a serious crime. I would think he committed armed robbery or burglary or embezzled funds or defrauded someone. Those who use the term "criminal" to define someone who overstayed a visa or illegally entered the country will defend calling the illegal aliens "criminals" by saying, they entered the country illegally so by definition they are criminals.
By saying that anyone who does something illegal is a criminal, then we are all criminals. With a vast bureaucratic state with bureaucrats empowered to promulgate rules which are in effect laws, I doubt there is no one not guilty of breaking some law. I can think of two laws I am guilty of violating right now and that does not include the driving offenses of which I have been guilty.
If someone said of a mutual acquaintance, "Well, you know he is a criminal." I would not think that he is someone who littered, jaywalked, ran a red light, or engaged in home sharing without the proper permit. I would not even think of someone found guilty of drunk driving or soliciting a prostitute or guilty of procession of marijuana as a criminal.
Entering the Country illegal or overstaying a visa is a federal misdemeanor. It is more like jaywalking than breaking and entering.
Here is a list of some other federal misdemeanors.
- Transportation of water hyacinth
- Failure
to
pay
legal
child
support
obligations
- Desecration
of
the
flag
of
the
United
States
- Wearing a military ribbon or medal to which one is not entitled
- Fraudulently using the 4-H
Club
emblem
- Unauthorized use of the "Smokey
Bear"
character
or
name
- Transportation
of
fireworks
into
a state
prohibiting
the sale
or
use of fireworks
- Hunting,
trapping,
or
fishing
on
Indian
land without a permit.
Would you call someone who transported water hyacinth a criminal? Would you call neighbor who bought home a bunch of Georgia fireworks a criminal?
I am not defending illegal immigration, but find it just as offensive to paint all illegal aliens as criminals as I do to erase the distinction between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.
Top Stories
Posts
