Friday, October 16, 2026

What Should Dems do When They Take Control of the House

W. H. Bernstein
by W. H. Bernstein, Facebook, Oct. 16, 2026- So it looks like Democrats will take the House in November, no shock. They may win a majority in the Senate, but I doubt it.

So what should Democrats do in control of the House?  They have limited power: the budget and investigations are mainly it.  There are legitimate investigations they need to have.  But since this administration is a target-rich environment of sleaze and corruption they could easily become overwhelmed with investigations.

My suggestion, like any Democrat has ever asked my opinion, is they should focus on the most serious areas of actual crime and Constitutional abuse.  Those would include:

The bombing of boats in the Atlantic.  The entire rational and intelligence of this operation is still not clear.  What intelligence did they have as to who and what was on those boats?  Who made the decision to destroy them, rather than simply interdicting them, as normal drug enforcement operation would suggest?  Why were two of the survivors whisked back to their home countries instead of standing trial for drug trafficking, as you might expect?  Who authorized any of this, and why?  What legal foundation was there here?

  • The killing of Renee Good and others by ICE.  What orders were agents given?  Why were agents involved transferred to other posts, some overseas, or otherwise made unavailable?  What evidence was gathered at the scenes?  Who made the decision to shut down investigations, and why?
  • ICE conduct.  What were ICE's orders regarding protestors?  Did ICE compile a database of people protesting peacefully and use it to harass them or target them?
  • Trump's pardons.  What process existed for getting a pardon under Trump?  Who bypassed the existing structure and protocols for pardons?  How were pardon decisions made?
  • Entanglements with family businesses.  How were contracts awarded to businesses with Trump family ties?  Was there a bidding process?  How involved were family members in these awards?  How or did family members benefit specifically?
  • Insider trading.  Did Trump or members of his administration trade on insider information, using futures markets or betting markets like Kalshi?
  • High-profile prosecutions.  Who made the decisions to prosecute people commonly taken to be Trump's enemies?  What legal basis was there for these prosecutions?  This includes Lisa Cook, Jerome Powell, and John Bolton.

I've probably missed a number of items, but these alone would keep committees occupied for the next two years.  What I don't want to see is multiple investigations that look politically motivated, with numerous impeachment votes.  Dems don't have the Senate votes to remove Trump, so impeachment would just underscore a desire for clownish political points.

Bill Bernstein, formerly of Nashville where he was owner of Eastside Gun Shop, now lives in Sumter, South Carolina. He is a scholar with a BA degree from Vanderbilt University and degrees in Classics from Corpus Christi College, Oxford, UNC-Chapel Hill, and University of Pennsylvania.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Treasury Confirms $2 Trillion Deficit for Fiscal Year 2026

From Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Oct 15, 2026 - The United States borrowed $2 trillion in Fiscal Year (FY) 2026, including $27 billion in the month of September, according to the latest Monthly Treasury Statement from the Treasury Department. 

The following is a statement from Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget: 

And there you have it: at an astonishing $2 trillion in borrowing, Fiscal Year 2026 had the largest deficit in our history outside of a war or recession.  

Today’s deficit figures cap off a remarkably dismal year for our fiscal health. In the same span over which we accumulated $2 trillion in borrowing, we also reached $40 trillion in gross national debt; watched debt held by the public grow to be as large as our entire economic output; spent more than $1 trillion on interest costs, more than our national defense; and all the while let another year lapse instead of addressing our trust funds as they march another year toward insolvency. 

America’s fiscal health is failing, and we need to take action to address it. In the year ahead, our leaders should avoid adding any new borrowing - on top of what we are already projected to – and commit to finding twice as many savings for every new must-have cost incurred. 

We also need a real fiscal goal beyond the promises of balancing the budget or the outlandish idea of fully paying off the debt. Fiscal discipline requires finding something both achievable and aggressive, and bringing deficits down to 3% of GDP – half their current level – fits that bill and would stabilize debt as a share of the economy. Tough choices will be needed to get there, and we’re running out of time to make them. 

Rod's Comment: Remember when the Republican Party was the party of fiscal discipline?  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, October 15, 2026

Cartoon of the Day: David and Goliath

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Why I Oppose Closed Primaries in Tennessee

by Rod Williams, Oct. 15, 2026 - I oppose closed primaries for the reasons expressed below by my friends Mark Rogers and Bill Bernstein in this email exchange. 

Nashville is a one-party town. Thankfully, the contest for mayor and Metro council members is non-partisan, but I also care who is elected sheriff, county clerk, public defender, and who our judges are. Republicans do not even run for these offices. The Democrat primary is tantamount to the election. While a Democrat will hold these offices, there are sane, moderate, competent Democrats, and then there are woke progressive ideologue Democrats. I care who wins these seats.

I have never bought the argument that a person votes in the opposing party's primary to select the most beatable candidate to be the standard bearer for the party they hope to defeat in the general election.



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

I’ve Seen What Measles Does to Children. America Should Heed the Warning.

Then-Second Lady Dr. Jill Biden and former Sen. Bill Frist visit with
two recently arrived refugee families at the Dagahaley refugee camp,
in Dadaab, Kenya, Aug. 8, 2011.
(Official White House Photo by David Lienemann)
by Senator Bill Frist, M.D., Facebook, Oct, 14, 2026- As a physician and as a Republican policymaker, I believe our commitment to science and to vaccines matters more today than ever.

In 2011, at the Dadaab refugee camp near the Kenya–Somalia border, I witnessed a measles outbreak that sickened thousands. Three-quarters were children under five. Once the outbreak began, vaccination efforts could barely keep up. It took months to get even the hospitalized children vaccinated.

That experience was on my mind in February 2015, when 102 Americans had contracted measles and I wrote about it in Forbes. I warned that we were courting an outbreak here at home, and that we didn’t have to.

As of October 8, the CDC has confirmed 4,080 U.S. cases. The country that declared measles eliminated in 2000 is now at real risk of losing that status.

We have the tools to protect children. The measles vaccine is 93% effective after one dose and 97% after two. Vaccination helped us achieve elimination. That progress is something we should defend.

Eleven years later, I stand behind what I wrote. Today, I’m republishing that Forbes piece on Substack, with a new note on where we are now. 

Read the piece, linked in the comments, and share it. The science hasn’t changed. Our commitment to it shouldn’t either.

I’ve Seen What Measles Does to Children. America Should Heed the Warning.

By Bill Frist, MD | Feb 11, 2015 | Forbes - In the United States, before 1963, there were 400,000 cases of measles per year. One thousand of those children developed measles encephalitis, a serious brain infection, and often subsequent permanent disability. An estimated 400-500 of those children died, and many who lived were plagued with permanent disabilities including deafness.

In 2000, the U.S. had [eliminated measles]. One of the most infectious diseases was eradicated by one of the most effective vaccines we have. The measles vaccine, which is 93% effective after one dose, and 97% effective after two, decreased incidence of the measles in this country by 99%. Thanks to vaccine science, we had achieved a monumental public health milestone.

Now the measles are back, and the disease is spreading quickly. Unlike Ebola, which requires direct contact with contaminated body fluids to spread, measles is airborne and lives in droplets for hours. You can get the measles from walking into the waiting room at the doctor’s office where a measles patient has been coughing before your arrival.

However, compared to our reaction to the Ebola epidemic, the public response to this measles outbreak is perplexing. We called for a rush vaccine for Ebola, for mandatory quarantines. We were outraged at the possibility of getting on a plane and catching Ebola.

However, there were four cases of Ebola in the U.S. There have been 102 cases of the measles since January 1. And most importantly, we already have a vaccine for the measles.

Globally, we still see about 20 million cases of measles a year. In 2013 the virus was responsible for 145,700 deaths. As a physician who has worked with patients all over the world, particularly in the developing world, I am adamantly pro-vaccine.

They save lives. People who live in countries without the healthcare infrastructure to care for measles patients desperately seek a preventative vaccine instead of watching their children suffer and potentially become disabled or die.

As a Republican, I am also adamantly pro-vaccine, and this is not something I have to work hard to reconcile. As my friend and colleague [then-]Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) said: “This is far too serious an issue to be treated as a political football.”

The Republican ethic stands behind our personal rights to make private choices about our life and our health, and vaccine mandates for children attending public schools fall squarely within this ethic. Despite what some people may be postulating, they are certainly nothing new.

In 1905, the Supreme Court held in Jacobson v. Massachusetts that vaccine mandates are clearly within a state’s powers to protect the public health. The court noted that,

“the liberty secured by the Constitution of the United States to every person within its jurisdiction does not import an absolute right in each person to be, at all times and in all circumstances, wholly freed from restraint. There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good. On any other basis organized society could not exist with safety to its members.”

Because all vaccination laws fall under state jurisdiction, the court was affirming a Massachusetts statute requiring vaccinations for smallpox stating it was reasonable, because it was not “arbitrary or oppressive,” had a substantial relation to the necessity of protecting the community, and was based on evidence. The court noted there needed to be exceptions for absurd consequences like serious risk of death or harm from inoculation. These are the health exceptions we have built into all vaccine laws.

Furthermore, vaccines don’t only protect the individual. Vaccinated individuals, together, create herd immunity. Exemption rates of as little as 2%-4% are sufficient to make a school more susceptible to outbreaks. Frighteningly, we are seeing non-vaccination rates as high as 10% in some counties in California. 

I appreciate the need to stand up for personal freedom and defend our liberties. But in the case of a highly infectious and highly contagious disease, the “choice” we are defending is one that allows neighbor to harm neighbor.

Senator Rand Paul, M.D. this week argued that vaccines have been voluntary for “most of our history.” He’s not quite right. Mandatory vaccination law with only health and religious exemptions has been the norm for the last century, which consequently coincides with how long vaccines have existed.

The vaccines are safe. Getting the measles, on the other hand, is definitely not safe. We have the deaths and morbidity to prove it. Being the party that tries to deny these types of facts will result in accusations and extrapolations that Republicans are anti-science. And that also, is just not true.

As a lawmaker, I introduced over a dozen bills that touched on vaccines, authoring the Improved Vaccine Affordability and Availability Act of 2003 (S. 754) and successfully enacting the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, which ensured we had a sufficient vaccine stockpile to combat a biological attack or other public health emergency.

I would eagerly vote the same way again. And I will stand up now and say that children should absolutely be vaccinated if they can be. We are a fortunate country with all of the best medications and vaccinations available. We should believe the science—the facts—and avail ourselves of what the rest of the world views as a privilege.



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

THE THREE AMENDMENTS …on the Tennessee November Ballot …a Brief Explanation

by Ralph Bristol, Oct. 13, 2026 - 

Amendment 1 — Denying bail for serious crimes

Currently, Tennessee's Constitution generally guarantees bail before trial except in capital cases.

This amendment would allow judges to deny bail for additional serious offenses, including terrorism, second-degree murder, aggravated rape and crimes requiring offenders to serve at least 85% of their sentences.

Amendment 2 — Prohibiting state property taxes

Tennessee currently has no statewide property tax, but the legislature retains the authority to impose one.

This amendment would permanently prohibit a state property tax unless voters subsequently changed the Constitution.

County and municipal property taxes would be unaffected.

Amendment 3 — Expanding crime victims' rights

Known as Marsy's Law, this amendment would expand constitutional protections for crime victims.

Among other things, victims would have stronger rights to receive information about proceedings, participate in parole hearings, receive notice of prisoner releases and have their safety considered in release decisions.

NOTE: An amendment must receive more YES votes than NO votes, and its YES votes must exceed half the total votes cast in the governor's race.

Ralph Bristol is the former long-time morning talk radio host broadcasting on Supertalk 99.7 WTN. He was one of the less provocative and bombastic of conservative radio personalities, more thoughtful and grounded in conservative ideas. He left talk radio in 2018 and retired. He lives in Nashville. 

Rod's Comment: These three proposed amendments will be on the Tennessee November 3rd ballot. Please vote yes on all three. To read the full text of the amendments, follow this link. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Cartoon of the Day: Nothing Says 'Pro-life' Quite Like Celebrating a Televised Execution

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, October 11, 2026

My Favorite Cartoon of the Day: Burn Those Books.

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Grade fixing scandal in Nashville. Heads Need to Roll.

by Rod Williams, Oct, 11, 2026- My bandwidth for outrage has been so consumed by Trump's authoritarian actions, his corruption, insane policies, and his clownish behavior that I haven't had much left over for other outrageous things happening elsewhere. However, we have a major outrage here at home that, if it has not grabbed your attention, needs to. If you are not familiar with what I am referring to, rather than try to explain it myself, I am reposting the Bing AI summary below:

Recent reports describe two major, related issues in Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) — a state-led civil-rights probe at Stratford High School and whistleblower allegations from a former teacher about grade fabrication.

1. Stratford High School civil-rights investigation
State officials have opened a Tennessee Department of Education civil-rights probe into alleged grade and credit manipulation at Stratford High School republicannation.com.

  • A former assistant principal, Dr. Howard Jones, told investigators he found students credited for classes not on the school’s master schedule and grades boosted to help them graduate republicannation.com.

  • Media reviews cited transcripts showing credits for courses a student did not attend in a given year republicannation.com.

  • Past internal files at Stratford documented sharp grade lifts in a credit recovery program, sometimes from the 50s/60s into the 90s, and a “contract” approach grading on effort rather than mastery republicannation.com.

  • The district says it reviewed the claims, found no proof, and maintains students must demonstrate mastery before credit recovery. It is cooperating with the investigation republicannation.com.
    Investigators will compare schedules, attendance, teacher-of-record lists, and system logs to determine if grades were altered improperly republicannation.com.

2. Teacher whistleblower: Samira Hardcastle
Former MNPS teacher Samira Hardcastle, a 2025–26 “Teacher of the Year,” resigned after claiming district leaders asked her to fabricate a grade for a student whose parent demanded a change NewsChannel 5 Nashville+1.

  • Hardcastle said the issue involved a missing art project; she refused to alter the failing grade, but the principal later changed it after reviewing late work republicanjournal.org.

  • She argued this undermined teacher authority and encouraged poor student behavior WPLN News.

  • MNPS denies broader grade manipulation, stating the change was based on principal review of late work and was not “for the purpose of producing a particular final course grade” NewsChannel 5 Nashville+1.

  • Hardcastle has called for an audit of MNPS and linked the case to concerns about inflated graduation rates NewsChannel 5 Nashville.

3. Broader context and implications
Both cases touch on grade integrity, parental pressure, and systemic incentives. The Stratford probe is part of a state effort to ensure student rights and academic standards, while Hardcastle’s resignation highlights tensions between teacher autonomy and administrative discretion republicannation.com+1.
The district’s responses emphasize policy compliance and lack of evidence for wrongdoing, but the investigation and whistleblower claims have drawn public and political attention republicannation.com+1.

What’s next

  • The state probe will likely produce formal interviews, records audits, and possible findings on whether grades were altered improperly republicannation.com.

  • Hardcastle’s case may lead to public board discussions and possibly a financial or policy review if lawmakers act on her recommendations NewsChannel 5 Nashville.

  • Both situations remain under scrutiny, with no final conclusions yet.

Key takeaway: The Nashville grade-fixing controversy involves documented allegations of credit manipulation at one school and a high-profile teacher resignation over suspected grade fabrication, with the state and district in the midst of reviews and disputes over evidence and policy republicannation.com+2.

This should not be swept under the rug. Heads need to roll. People need to be fired.  At every opportunity, the mayor, council members, and school board members need to be asked about this. There needs to be high-profile council investigations, and politicians should not be allowed to pass the buck or weasel out of addressing this. The guilty need to be held accountable.

I am behind the curve myself in what actions are being taken, but I am going to be monitoring this much more closely. If Metro cannot correct this, then the State needs to aggressively intervene. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, October 10, 2026

My Favorite Cartoon of the Day: Russian Diesel.

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, October 09, 2026

Referendum Language for Fairgrounds Racing Ban Gets Approved as Petition Tactics Face Scrutiny.

by Megan Podsiedlik, The Pamphleteer, Oct. 9, 2026- The Charter Revision Commission approved the ballot language for a referendum to ban racing at the Fairgrounds Nashville during a brief meeting yesterday. As of now, the measure can move forward if the Election Commission verifies that the petition in relation to the referendum has enough valid signatures. If all hurdles are cleared, the referendum would appear on next year’s ballot, giving Nashville voters the chance to decide the fate of racing at the historic Fairgrounds.

“There's not anything that can be said that's going to sway us one way or the other because what we have to do is basically just approve the ballot,” said Commission Chair Dewey Branstetter. The chair went on to explain that the commission’s role is simply "ministerial” before opening up public comment.

Jon Cooper, an attorney with Holland & Knight representing Decline to Sign, which opposes the proposed ban on racing at the fairgrounds, acknowledged that the referendum language clearly outlines the ban but questioned the validity of the petition process. 

“We have multiple examples of canvassers throughout the process misleading voters to get signatures by saying that Metro had already decided to tear down the racetrack and that this is going to get affordable housing in its place,” said Cooper. “I’ve submitted to Mr. Kyle, for the record, approximately one hour of video footage showing multiple instances of these falsehoods.”

John Spraggins, a local attorney and president of Care for Nashville, a group supporting the referendum, argued that the video should be stricken from the record. “That’s not really relevant to what this commission is considering today,” he said.

Councilmember Olivia Hill raised concerns about voter clarity after being approached four separate times to sign the petition.

“Each time I was approached [they] said, ‘Hey, would you like affordable housing in Nashville?’ and I said, ‘Sure!’” explained Hill. “And they're like, ‘Just sign this petition.’”

“I understand that your duty today is very ministerial in nature, but I do think it's one of the first steps during this entire process where something has been made crystal clear and truthful to the voters of Nashville,” said MNPS School Board member and former Metro Council member Zach Young, reiterating that the referendum would only end auto racing at the fairgrounds.

For funsies, Chair Branstetter asked legal counsel what would have happened if the commission had rejected the referendum language. Legal explained that the body would have been required to provide its exact reasoning. “And then we'd end up in Chancery Court on the other end,” said Branstetter, underscoring the justification for the body’s decision.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories