Andy Ogles now denies raising $25,000 from public for children's burial garden

Top Stories

The Deck is Stacked in Andy Ogles Favor as Republicans Choose New Voters for Ogles

The New 5th

by Rod Williams, May 15, 2026-The redrawn newly adopted Tennessee Congressional maps have shifted the 5th Congressional seat to the west of Nashville, running through rural west Tennessee to the Mississippi River and south along the river to the outskirts of Memphis. As reported by The Tennessean, the new 5th Congressional district has only 17% of the same people as the current district. It looks like the district was purposely redrawn to improve Ogles chances for reelection. The new 5th includes none of Davidson County, where Ogles is unpopular and cuts Ogles ' strongest challenger out of the district. The new lines split Maury County and Columbia, putting Ogles in the district and cutting Columbia mayor Chaz Molder out of the district.

This is disappointing and disturbing. Politicians should not get to select their voters. I do not live in the 5th and cannot vote against Ogles even if the district lines had not changed, but would if I could. I had already sent Molder a modest contribution and was prepared to send more.  

Ogles is pathetic. It looks like he stays up late at night reading Trump's Truth Social post, so he can be the first to propose legislation the next morning to enact into law whatever insane weird thought Trump had at 2:30 AM during the night. Luckly none of it makes it into law, but Ogles gets some face time on Fox news and a pat on the head from Trump. Ogles has got to be Trump's number one lapdog, bootlicker, or whatever term you want to use to describe such subservient sycophant behavior. 

The Current 5th

I was excited that it was looking like Ogles could be defeated. I was excited that it looked like Democrats were going to choose a sensible moderate to challenge Ogles as opposed to some progressive woke nut-job, like they did when they chose Aftyn Behn as their candidate for the 7th Congressional District last year. Democrats had a chance to take the 7th but threw it away. 

Some time ago, I reached the conclusion that to stop Trump's authoritarian agenda, Democrats needed to retake the House. I live in the 7th and when there was a special election to fill the vacant seat for this district, I was prepared to vote for a Democrat and then the Democrat nominee turned out to be Aftyn Behn, and I just couldn't do it. I voted for Republican Van Epps. 

It looks like in the race against Ogles, Democrats were not going to make the same mistake they made in nominating Behn in the 7th. Molder looks like the kind of candidate that disaffected Republicans and independents could support. Unfortunately, Republican lawmakers have chosen a new set of voters for Ogles, and it will now be much harder to unseat him. 

Molder has been gaining momentum, and the more I have learned about him, the more I like him.  He has raised more than $1.8 million since he announced his candidacy and more that 85% of it came from Tennesseans. That is a lot of money. Congressman Ogles has only raised about $440,000. It was looking like Molder could actually beat Ogles. 

Molder has announced that he is still running for Congress in the 5th. Good for him. U.S. representatives are not required to live in the districts they represent. I am glad Ogles will have a strong challenger. Unfortunately, it is going to be even more of an uphill battle for Molder. The new district looks a lot safer for a Trumpinista Republican than did the old district. I will keep following this campaign and hope for Trump's popularity to continue to drop and that there is a blue wave big enough to sweep Andy Ogles out of office, but the new maps make it much harder to unseat America's worst congressman. 

Top Stories

Harwood Salon, The Revolutionary Nature of the Declaration of Independence with John Vile, May 28th

From Harwood Salon Nashville, May 15, 2026: 

We’re less than two weeks away from our upcoming Harwood Salon in Nashville on Thursday, May 28 at 6:00 p.m. CT.

Join us for an evening with John Vile, Professor of Political Science and Dean of the University Honors College at Middle Tennessee State University, as he explores the ideas behind the Declaration of Independence and their lasting influence on liberty, limited government, and the American founding.

Drinks and heavy hors d’oeuvres will be served. The event is free to attend, but space is limited and registration is required.

We encourage you to reserve your seat soon.

REGISTER HERE

Top Stories

Former Mayor of Nashville Megan Barry Picks up Petition to Run for TN Congressional District 6

Megan Barry

by Rod Williams, May 13, 2026- Megan Barry, the former disgraced mayor of Nashville, has picked up a petition to run for the newly redrawn Tennessee Congressional District 6, the one Rep. John Rose currently occupies.  Since John Rose is running for governor, there will be no incumbent running in that district.

You may recall the Barry scandal. She was caught having an affair with her police bodyguard. They had gone on lavish trips together on the taxpayer's dime, and he had been paid a lot of overtime for providing security for the mayor.  In March 2018, following weeks of news coverage and speculation regarding her future, Barry pleaded guilty to a Class C felony in Nashville criminal court as part of a plea bargain. Following her guilty plea, Barry resigned as mayor. 

Barry has since tried to resurrect her political career several times. In 2023, Barry announced that she would run in Tennessee's 7th congressional district against incumbent Republican Mark Green. Green had announced that he would not run for reelection following accusations of infidelity during his divorce proceedings but changed his mind after Donald Trump urged him to stay in the race. He won the general election over Barry with approximately 60% of the votes.

I am not sure that Barry's previous felony conviction and her sordid affair would hinder her political resurrection. Americans in general are much less concerned about sexual morality or marital infidelity than they once were. Also, Americans have become accustomed to massive corruption, as exemplified by Donald Trump. Many voters love Trump despite his lack of morality. Barry's affair and related crimes seem quaint by comparison. Trump has kind of made all politicians scandal-proof. 

I don't know what her chances of victory in a race would be. As of now, we don't even know who her opponent would be. The district is mostly rural, and all districts are drawn to be Republican majority districts. I don't know how she would be received among rural conservative voters. Time having passed since her scandal will make her less of a pariah; however, the passage of time dampens her name recognition and the depth of political connections. 

For more on this, follow this link.  

Top Stories

This is Not What Democracy Looks Like

by Rod Williams, May 12, 2026- Last week the state legislature voted to adopt new Congressional maps, which eliminated Tennessee's only Congressional seat held by a Democrat.  On the one hand, I am disappointed. I want to see Dems take the House in the midterm because I want Donald Trump's authoritarian agenda and policies to be derailed and I want to see Congressional oversight and investigation of Trump's massive corruption and other misdeeds.   On the other hand, I think it is time to end racial gerrymandering. I want to see racial preferences and carve-outs end. It is time to stop discriminating on account of race. This post is not about the merits of that issue, however.

If you watch the news, you have seen reports of the disruptions in the Tennessee House chambers during the proceedings. This is a disgrace. Any sympathy I had for those who felt the adoption of these new maps was a reimposition of Jim Crow evaporated in light of the disgraceful demonstrations in the House, both from guests in the gallery and in the halls outside the chamber, and from legislators inside the chamber. In the chambers of the legislative body, there is no place for foghorns, banners, marches, or standing on one's desk with banners. 

Legislative deliberations should occur in a calm, dignified, respectful manner. Robert's Rules and House protocol should be observed. The rules exist for a reason. Those who violate the rules of the House should be expelled. When observers become participants and unruly, they should be removed. I know the House has expelled members before for inappropriate behavior, and the legislator was reelected. So be it. Expel them again.

Years ago, I had to sit in court numerous times due to an ongoing battle with my crazy ex-wife, who wanted to deny me visitation with my daughter and make my life miserable. While awaiting my case to be heard, I had a bailiff make me put away a newspaper I was reading.  I have seen people expelled from the courtroom and their cases rescheduled because they were dressed inappropriately.

While serving in the Metro Council, I have seen large crowds of agitated spectators in the chamber, passionate over a zoning proposal, a budget cut, or a tax increase. Order was maintained. Waving signs was prohibited and an outburst would lead to an admonition from the Chair and a threat to clear the chamber. Even applause was prohibited.

I would like to see the House impose the same kind of decorum as I witness in a courtroom or the Metro Council chamber. Democracy requires the ability to conduct business in a calm, deliberative manner. A deliberative body should not have to function in a climate of mob hysteria. 

Top Stories

Debt Disaster Denialists Think America Has a New Magic Bullet

by Mitch Daniels, The Washington Post, May 12, 2026 - For years, I kept a favorite cartoon in my desk and pulled it out to open the annual business-plan meeting at the unit I led. It showed a frazzled executive standing in front of a screen displaying his multiyear sales projections. The line ran straight horizontally, close and parallel to the x-axis, almost to the right edge, where it leaped steeply upward, next to a label that said, “Miracle happens here!”

No impulse is more human than wishfulness, the tendency to grasp at any straw that enables us to avert our eyes from difficult realities and put off facing them. Members of America’s national political class personify this failing, in their continuing practice of fiscal denialism. Even as the inexorable arithmetic piles up, those responsible for the nation’s economic future and national security fasten on imaginary miracles to justify a gross default of their duty of stewardship.

A decade ago, as the national debt surged toward the once unthinkable level of $20 trillion (now nearing $40 trillion), denialists took brief refuge in an alchemist fantasy that called itself Modern Monetary Theory. The notion that a nation could borrow without limit, forever, in its own fiat currency was quickly demolished by full-spectrum critiques, in venues ranging from the Cato Institute to the Review of Keynesian Economics. ... 

In our post-truth world, facts aren’t as stubborn as they used to be, but the most obstinate of all are the mathematical ones. They tell us not to rely on even the powerfully positive impact of these new technologies to spare us the radical adjustments that a generation of procrastination has now made inevitable.

... What’s not credible is the idea that even an AI-led productivity surge can suffice to offset our decades of dereliction. ... This is no time to be touting miracle cures to justify further procrastination. Until America acts to make major changes in laws on the books, the right side of our national business-plan chart will continue to show a sharp downward line and the label, “Big trouble happens here.” (read it all)

Mitch Daniels is a senior adviser to the Liberty Fund, president emeritus of Purdue University, a co-chair of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and a former governor of Indiana.

Top Stories

Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand America as a Creedal Nation.

Mark Rogers

by Mark Rogers, Facebook, April 11, 2026- Reason wades into the debate over the true nature of America with a rousing defense of Justice Gorsuch and his comments about America being a 'creedal' nation. That is to say, America is based on certain propositions such as 'Equality,' 'Inalienable Rights,' and 'self-rule.' It is, in this view, not about race or religion, or land or language or culture. 

I do take some issue with Justice Gorsuch on the question of 'culture.'  I think that while America was not based on one specific culture, that has more to do with the diversity of cultures within the nations that first came here from Europe. The English brought the cultures of various peoples from the city of London to the moors of Scotland and the forests of Wales and the green fields of Ireland. (For more information on this, read Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fischer.) 

Germans came here well before the Revolution from the various states of that area, bringing their own cultures. French Protestants and Catholics were here along with the Spanish and Portuguese. 

While all these featured highly individualistic local cultures, all were, at their cores, profoundly shaped by Western Civilization. In that sense, America was dramatically shaped by one culture but one with many faces. And one of the West's greatest achievements by 1787 was the idea that successful nations needed to generally tolerate different cultures and religions. 

What America wasn't in its beginning and never has been is the property of one group, not based on birth or religion or language or philosophy. Like Western Civilization itself, America absorbs new People and new Ideas and new Beliefs and moves on while remaining true to our fundamental creedal Ideas.

Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand What Makes America Great

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch

by Stephanie Slade, Reason, May 9, 2026 -The Dissident Right is furious after Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch told Reason and several other outlets that America is a "creedal nation."

"The Declaration of Independence had three great ideas in it," Gorsuch said in a recent interview with Nick Gillespie. "That all of us are equal; that each of us has inalienable rights given to us by God, not government; and that we have the right to rule ourselves. Our nation is not founded on a religion. It's not based on a common culture, even, or heritage. It's based on those ideas. We're a creedal nation."

...  The belief in a "civic" nationalism—the idea that the United States is a "propositional nation," as the Catholic theologian John Courtney Murray put it, rather than one based on blood and soil—is mainstream among Americans of all stripes, including conservatives. ... 

.... there are elements of culture that must represent a consensus if the Republic that the Founders bequeathed us is to endure. First and foremost, we need a culture of mutual forbearance, where people want to coexist peacefully even with those who see things differently, and where people take pride in the ideals of human liberty and equal treatment under law, recognizing that America's commitment to those ideals is a large part of what makes it great. 

...  the Dissident Right, which rejects the very notion of mutual forbearance in favor of a "will-to-power" political approach, doesn't have the answer. You can't save America's culture by sacrificing its creed. (read more)

Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics.  He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.

Top Stories

Why Trump’s Golden Statue Crossed a RED Line

by Rod Williams, May 10, 2026- Yesterday, when my Facebook feed first showed the image of the golden statue of Donald Trump and the evangelical leaders blessing or dedicating the statue, I thought it was a fake. I didn't share it. It was simply too outrageous. Well, as we all now know, it was real. 

Ever since Donald Trump appeared on the scene, I have been mystified that he could take positions contrary to what Republicans, conservatives, or Christians believed, and yet people would not disavow him. He took the party that was the stronger advocate of America's leadership role in the world, most likely to support the aspirations of freedom-loving people resisting tyranny, the party most committed to collective security, and turned it into a party committed to weakening NATO. The Trump administration even refuses to acknowledge Russian President Putin as a war criminal and seems to be siding with Putin in his unprovoked war against Ukraine and yet his supporters love him. 

Prior to Trump, the Republican Party was the party of free enterprise and free trade, and yet Republicans supported Trump's insane tariff wars. Republicans often accused Democrats of being socialist, and yet Trump has the government take ownership interest in businesses and Republicans think that is a grand idea.

When it comes to support for the Constitution, the rule of law, states' rights, and separations of powers, Trump's followers now support positions they would have railed against.

The block of voters most supportive of Trump is evangelical Christians. Why? Trump is no doubt the most immoral president we have ever had. He cheated on all his wives, cheated in business, is extremely corrupt, is profane, and shows no signs of piety or compassion or even humane decency. He appears ignorant of the Bible and does not even pretend to have a strong religious faith. 

I grew up in an evangelical household, and my father had a singing ministry. I grew up falling asleep on church pews. As an adult, for a few years, I attended an evangelical church. I thought I knew how the more fundamentalist or evangelical Christians viewed things. I thought I knew their values. I was as wrong about this group of people as I was about pro-Constitution conservatives or pro-market conservatives. 

One would think that Christian fundamentalists would disavow Trump. This is not the first thing Trump has done that should have dampened their enthusiasm for the man. One would think his personal morality would concern this block of voters, yet he can get caught paying off a porn star, and they don't have second thoughts. Recently, Trump has done several things that look an awful lot like blasphemy, yet his Christians love him. From the Trump Bible, to his spiritual advisor Paula White comparing him to Christ in an Easter sermon, to the meme Trump posted on Truth Social depicting himself as Christ healing the sick, and now something that looks an awful lot like idolatry. It doesn't matter. They stand by their man. I guess their religious values are no different from their economic and political values. If they have to choose between their values and Trump, they choose Trump.

The above video is one of the best pieces I have read or viewed on the topic. I regularly watch Professor Gerdes ' videos. His usual topic is the conflict between Ukraine and Russia and anything related to that but sometimes he will veer off into other topics. Like me, he is an old school, pre-Trump conservative.  I highly recommend his YouTube channel. I am less familiar with Greg Terry, but he is sometimes a guest on Gerde's video channel. 

Top Stories

Ralph Bristol

 by Ralph Bristol, Facebook, May 9, 2026- John Rose, my congressman, is running for governor, against Marsha Blackburn, our U.S. Senator. 

I don’t know if this is John’s first commercial, but it’s the first one I’ve seen, and I thought it was pretty good – very positive, highlighting his own qualities and accomplishments, which appear impressive, but for reasons we all know, he just couldn’t help himself. 

He had to include a positive statement about President Trump in his commercial. He’s “tough, like Trump,” which he said twice in 30 seconds. 

At least he picked one of Trump’s potentially best characteristics, instead of his worst – his economic policies.  But his references to Trump significantly detract from the value of his commercial for everyone but Trump’s MAGA base. 

So, it’s a matter of mathematics whether the inclusion makes the commercial better or worse, as a campaign tool.  Did it win voters or lose them?  His pollsters obviously think it will win primary voters. 

It didn’t necessarily lose me, but it overcame the positive reaction I had to the rest of the commercial.  

I haven’t seen Marsha’s first commercial yet.  The first ones are always the most positive, and then they start to turn ugly.  I know Marsha much better, as a policy maker, than John, and neither leaves a positive policy impression, so I am likely as not to write in a different name for governor, since I have no knowledge of any of the other candidates, and one of these two will almost certainly be the eventual winner. 

This interests Boomer Power only in that one of them will be in a position to either help or hurt my mission to control the cost of the federal government, since half of what state governments spend comes from the federal government, which remain in danger of letting its debt create the worst recession the world has ever seen – greater than the Great Depression.

It will be a lot like the Great Depression, except that the world’s people, especially Americans, are MUCH more dependent on government help than they were then.  And, that will disappear, because the U.S. government will no longer have access to affordable credit to finance that help – and people will be on their own for the first times in generations.  

Both John and Marsha helped usher in the debt that is the greatest single, domestic threat to our nation and our constitution.  Unless one of them expresses convincing contrition and persuades me that they can and will spend their gubernatorial terms repairing their damage to our federal budget, I’ll likely be voting for someone else. \

Ralph Bristol is the former long-time morning talk radio host broadcasting on Supertalk 99.7 WTN. He was one of the less provocative and bombastic of conservative radio personalities, more thoughtful and grounded in conservative ideas. He left talk radio in 2018 and retired. He lives in Nashville. 

Rod's Comment: 
I had the same reaction as Ralph. I know I will not vote for Marsha. She has been a shameless Trump bootlicker. I had assumed I would vote for John Rose. After seeing his commercial, in which he goes out of his way to wrap himself in Trump's mantle, I am unsure whom I will vote for. 

Top Stories

U.S. Deficit Projected to Hit $2 Trillion, Double Fiscal Target

by Brett Rowland, The Center Square, May 8, 2026- The federal government is projected to post a $2 trillion deficit in fiscal year 2026, double the 3% of GDP target that has bipartisan support in Congress, according to Treasury's quarterly refunding documents.

The $2 trillion figure in fiscal year 2026 is up from $1.7 trillion last year. The Office of Management and Budget projects a deficit of $2.065 trillion, primary dealers surveyed by Treasury projected a median of $1.950 trillion and the Congressional Budget Office's February 2026 baseline projected $1.853 trillion.

Will McBride, the Tax Foundation's chief economist, said the numbers show Congress isn't taking action to address financial warnings about the U.S. debt.

"It indicates Congress and the administration are still ignoring the dangers of an unsustainable debt trajectory and actively making it worse rather than addressing it," McBride told The Center Square. "The effect is to make a crisis more likely to happen sooner rather than later."

The projections come from Treasury's quarterly refunding presentation to the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, a panel of bond market participants that advises the department on debt management, making them among the most closely watched fiscal disclosures in financial markets.

A bipartisan resolution pending in Congress, House Resolution 981, would set a fiscal target of reducing the federal deficit to 3% of GDP or less by 2030. The measure has drawn support from both parties, with 18 co-sponsors including Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, Blue Dog Co-Chairs Jared Golden, D-Maine, and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., and the resolution's lead sponsors, Reps. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., and Scott Peters, D-Calif.

Huizenga said the 3% target remains the right goal despite the widening gap.

"We've been on the wrong fiscal path for far too long," Huizenga told The Center Square. "The point of the resolution is to get Republicans and Democrats – in Congress, across the federal government, and throughout the private sector – to show agreement and rally around 3% as the most practical, immediate target to address the fiscal crisis."

Arrington, the House Budget Committee chairman, said the nation is "sleepwalking off of a cliff" on its fiscal trajectory.

"The federal deficit has not fallen below 3% of GDP since 2015," Arrington said. "According to current projections, it will continue to exceed 5% of GDP every year for the next three decades. Throughout our history, deficits this large have only appeared in the shadow of wars and economic collapse."

Arrington called for "a combination of discretionary spending discipline, pro-growth economic policies and entitlement reform" to address the problem.

The federal government has not recorded a budget surplus since 2001. Since then, spending has outpaced revenues every year, with deficits ballooning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The fiscal year 2025 deficit was $1.7 trillion, roughly 6% of GDP, and the new Treasury projections suggest fiscal year 2026 will be worse. The last time the federal government ran a deficit below the 3% of GDP threshold proposed in HR 981 was 2015, according to the resolution's own text.

Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said the trajectory is alarming.

"$2 trillion deficits used to be unheard of, and then they only occurred during major recessions – it's beyond scary that $2 trillion deficits are now the norm," she said in a statement.

Rep. Scott Peters, D-Calif., said the projections confirm the deficit is heading in the wrong direction.

"Congress needs to change course immediately," Peters told The Center Square, calling on lawmakers to pass his Fiscal Commission Act, which would appoint a bipartisan panel of Democrats, Republicans and independent experts to recommend changes to both taxes and spending to reduce borrowing.

A recent survey by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation found that 92% of voters – including 89% of Republicans, 92% of independents and 94% of Democrats – are concerned the national debt is driving up their personal cost of living. The foundation's U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index fell to a 22-month low of 42 in April, reflecting what the organization described as voters' desire for elected leaders to address the country's fiscal challenges.

"The rising national debt has effectively become a kitchen table issue for Americans because it contributes to rising costs across the economy, from grocery bills to car payments," said Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation.

The deficit projections come despite repeated commitments from the administration to address the nation's fiscal trajectory. In a March 2025 address to Congress, President Donald Trump pledged to balance the federal budget for the first time in 24 years. In his February 2026 State of the Union, Trump attributed a potential balanced budget to fraud elimination, saying his administration could balance the budget overnight if it found enough fraud.

The deficit trajectory is compounding the government's debt burden. The federal government spent more than $1 trillion servicing its debt in fiscal year 2025, more than it spent on national defense, and that figure is projected to grow. The national debt passed 100% of GDP in March, according to Treasury data. The Government Accountability Office, the nonpartisan research arm of Congress, warned in April that the nation's fiscal path is "unsustainable" and poses "serious economic, security, and social challenges if not addressed."

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has long acknowledged the deficit problem. Before his confirmation, he publicly championed a "3-3-3" plan that included cutting the budget deficit to 3% of GDP by 2028, and during his January 2025 Senate confirmation hearing testified that federal spending was "out of control." His most recent congressional testimony, delivered April 22, focused on tax cuts and IRS modernization without addressing the deficit trajectory shown in his department's own quarterly refunding documents released two weeks later.

In response to a request for comment, Treasury pointed to economic growth projections and a fraud elimination task force announced in March. The GAO has estimated the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud, based on data for fiscal years 2018 through 2022, a fraction of the projected $2 trillion deficit.

Rod's Comment: 
This is alarming and unsustainable. Also, keep in mind that the Social Security Trust Fund will be out of money in 2032. Congress will not allow benefits to be cut to 77% of their current level and will most likely fund the SS deficit from the general fund, leading to even more deficit spending. Also, while America is still the world's reserve currency and people still want our debt, there are signs that that position is weakening. The U.S. government is increasingly relying on short-term debt instruments to fund our massive budget deficits, rather than issuing a balanced mix of long-term bonds.  Donald Trump has increased deficit spending and grown the national debt. Unfortunately, if Democrats take back the reins of government, I do not expect them to do a better job. I am gloomy about America's future prospects. I don't expect future generations to have it as good as we have it. We are rolling downhill like a snowball headed for hell. 

Top Stories

Poll Shows Marsha Blackburn with Wide Lead in Governor's Race

The Beacon Center, May 8, 2026- Today, we released the latest installment of the Beacon Poll, a statewide survey of 1,200 Tennessee voters featuring questions about voters’ views on energy sources and production in Tennessee, the condition of roads and what revenue sources could be used to improve them, and political approval ratings at the state and federal level.

As the gubernatorial primaries draw near, Marsha Blackburn continues to expand her already commanding lead in the Republican primary. Blackburn now garners 63% of the vote, up from 56% in January, giving her a 53-point lead over Congressman John Rose (10%) and a 58-point lead over state Rep. Monty Fritts (5%).

On the Democratic side, the most popular candidate by far is “Not Sure” at 62%, leaving the field wide open. Jerri Green has a slight edge over the rest of the field at 14%, followed closely by Kevin Lee McCants (11%) and Carnita Atwater (8%). While Green currently has only a 3-point lead, she is nearly a 90% favorite to win the primary, according to Polymarket.

In this year’s first hypothetical general election matchup for governor, with the candidates chosen based on current Polymarket odds, Senator Blackburn opens with a massive 24-point lead on Democratic frontrunner Jerri Green.

Top Stories

‘An Existential Crisis’: Residents Pay for Nashville Boom, Says Financial Times

by Rod Williams, May 6, 2026 - The Financial Times has published an article addressing the rising cost of living in Nashville, focusing on rising property taxes. The article is behind a paywall and reading it is not worth the hassle of registering in order to get your one free article. For any informed Nashvillian, the article does not tell you anything you don't already know. It is the fact that it is in the Financial Times and the story will reach a wider audience that is newsworthy, not what the article says.

To summarize the piece, property taxes have increased substantially, and some locals are being priced out of the city. A lot of people who live here could not afford to buy here if they did not already own their own home. Local businesses as well as residents are being hit. Unfortunately, the article implies that the problem is not a bloated city government, but that we do not have an income tax. The politician they chose to feature in addressing the issue of Nashville's affordability is woke socialist Rep. Aftyn Behn.

Here is an excerpt:

‘An Existential Crisis’: Residents Pay for Nashville Boom

Claire Jones in Nashville and Ian Hodgson in Washington, Financial Times, Published May 4 2026 -After a long career in show business, Tom Morales was looking forward to leaving Acme Feed & Seed, his Nashville music venue, to his children. But a letter from the city last October changed everything.

Morales’s property taxes had jumped from $129,000 a year to $589,000. “You just open up the envelope and say, ‘What? This can’t be right,’” said Morales. “Having a business you can give to your kids is something you dream about. I was like, ‘Oh my God, I’ve just ruined their lives.’”

“We were thinking it would go up 30, 40 per cent; I could never have imagined it was going to go up 380 or 400 per cent,” added his daughter, Lauren.

Morales is not alone. Nashville has transformed over the past decade as big business and new residents moved in, lured by Tennessee’s zero income tax rate and a booming tourism economy. (read more)

Top Stories