Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Former Metro Councilman and Pastor Jerry Maynard Jr. Accused in 'Fraud Scheme' to Steal $200 Million from Drug Company

by Jennifer Kraus, WTVP News Channel 5, May 27, 2026 - A former Metro councilman and leader
of a large North Nashville church is accused of being part of a massive and ongoing "fraud scheme" to steal more than $200 million from a major drug manufacturer.

NewsChannel 5 Investigates has learned that Jerry Maynard Jr., along with his father, Jerry Maynard Sr., and sister, Misha Maynard, are among the defendants named in a federal civil lawsuit filed last week by drug company Eli Lilly.

They are accused of being part of an operation that bought "enormous quantities" of the diabetes drug, Trulicity, over at least the last five years, and then turned in hundreds of thousands of drug rebate claims for the drug, according to the lawsuit, for "fictional" patients, supposedly members of the Church of God In Christ, a Pentecostal denomination.

Maynard Jr., who once served as a Metro councilman at-large and has run a high-profile lobbying and business consulting firm, is the longtime Senior Pastor at the Cathedral of Praise, located off Clarksville Pike. According to its website, the church is part of the Church in God in Christ denomination.

Maynard's father serves as Bishop of the church. His sister Misha is the church's COO and pastor of operations. (read it all)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Harwood Salon, The Revolutionary Nature of the Declaration of Independence with John Vile, May 28th

From Harwood Salon Nashville, May 15, 2026: 

We’re less than two weeks away from our upcoming Harwood Salon in Nashville on Thursday, May 28 at 6:00 p.m. CT.

Join us for an evening with John Vile, Professor of Political Science and Dean of the University Honors College at Middle Tennessee State University, as he explores the ideas behind the Declaration of Independence and their lasting influence on liberty, limited government, and the American founding.

Drinks and heavy hors d’oeuvres will be served. The event is free to attend, but space is limited and registration is required.

We encourage you to reserve your seat soon.

REGISTER HERE


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Democratic Party 'Autopsy' of 2024 Election Fails to Address the Real Reason Dems Lost

Mark Rogers

 by Mark Rogers, Facebook, May 27, 2026- I have read several articles on the DNC's 'autopsy' of the 2024 elections and the most obvious conclusion from that document is that the authors (and a huge block within the Democratic Party) are delusional ideologues who are more interested in denying the real underlying reasons for their defeat so they can claim there is no reason to look at a less extremist agenda for the party. 

Consider these examples.

One insane conclusion is that the Biden insiders 'misused' Harris by placing her in charge of immigration issues, a 'border czarina,' so to speak. The autopsy cites this as not helpful to her without noting that that was a result of Biden's spineless (effectively) open borders policy, designed entirely to placate a minority of extreme left immigration advocates. 

While I am no fan of Ms. Harris for myriad reasons, it is grossly unfair to blame her for a policy that was, by 2022 (with two years to enact reforms), a looming disaster. Yet the autopsy cannot bring itself to blame the policy that gave Trump a major advantage and historic levels of Hispanic votes. Instead, it blames the choice on the Titanic's navigator instead of its captain. 

The second example of the unreality of the document is that it doesn't seem to be able to accept that a majority of Americans had turned against the Democrats on the economy. While there were many components to the high inflation that imposed so much pain on most Americans, one that cannot be ignored was Biden's reckless spending, that was predicted to do exactly what it was expected to do, fuel inflation. 

That 'Bidenflation' was heard and read across the fruited plains should have served as a stronger warning. But then, as Biden's handlers kept having him reenact Kevin Bacon's 'Remain calm. All is well" speech from 'Animal House,' the pain of voters attached itself to him and the party, showing them to be uninterested in the lives of the People. 

Two more observations.

The report fails to mention the war in Gaza and the impact of the violence and virulent anti-Semitism of many on the far left, especially the young. As voters made a connection between college aged people calling for the destruction of Israel and the same people getting Biden to forgive their student loans, that cannot have helped Democrats. 

And the report doesn't hold Biden's keepers responsible for their conspiracy to keep the voters from knowing how far Biden had declined. I can't say the Democrats lost the election when Biden went bye bye during the debate but it was a moment that not only damaged Biden's credibility but that of his team, including Harris. We will never know how many swing voters concluded that she knew how incompetent he had become and stayed quiet for her own interests. But it well may have been something that cost her such a close election.

Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics.  He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Scientist Ditch the Alarmist Doomsday Climate Change Predictions

by Rod Williams, May 26, 2026- I have almost always accepted the theory of global warming. When I first heard about it and had not read serious articles and books about it, I was skeptical and may have even derided it. However, that did not last long. As I became more informed, I came to accept the theory. Shortly after it came out in 2007, I read Al Gore's book, An Inconvenient Truth, and found it convincing. I followed up by reading other mainstream articles, listening to informed debate, and became more convinced. Then I read the United Nations' The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report and was convinced with a greater degree of certainty. 

Despite accepting climate change as reality, I was always skeptical of the certainty with which many climate activists believed in a doomsday scenario. For one thing, I reasoned, while manmade CO2 emissions may be warming the earth, the climate is always changing. We do not know if we are entering or still receding from an ice age. Also, I reasoned, we have alternatives to fossil fuels that may become a greater share of the energy mix. Also, we will make advances in geoengineering, I reasoned.  In other words, there were too many other variables that one could not hold constant for me to be a climate change alarmist. I found it unconvincing that the predictions of climate change was going to kill us all.

It did not help that the most shrill voices warning of climate change were, well- were so shrill. Often, it seemed like their climate change hysteria almost had a religious component. It seemed they were the same crowd who wanted to blame all the world's ills on capitalism or colonialism or toxic masculinity or some such. Also, the most promising alternative to fossil fuels is nuclear energy and the same people who were the most shrill and alarmist about climate change were the ones most likely to chain themselves to the gates of the Clinch River nuclear reactor site and most likely to denounce nuclear energy. They vehemently rejected the most readily available remedy to the problem.  It seemed to me that they wanted the issue of climate change more than they wanted a solution. Climate change hysteria seemed like a lifestyle brand.  It was part of their identity as opponents of modernity and prosperity. Also, it does not help when the climate change activist equates climate change theory skeptics with Holocaust deniers, as some were prone to do.

So, while I accepted the theory of climate change, I was not an alarmist and the certainty with which I accepted the dire warnings of doom fluctuated.  You may recall the "hide the decline" scandal in which hackers released emails from climate scientists in which they spoke of "tricks" to manipulate data to make it conform to what they expected the data to show. This may not have been a scandal at all and simply a misinterpretation of scientific methodology. Nevertheless, for a while, my skepticism rose. 

Another source of my doomsday skepticism was reading False Alarm by bestselling author Bjorn Lomborg. He does not deny climate change is a reality but argues it's not the apocalyptic threat that we've been told it is. I recommend his book and becoming familiar with his arguments. In addition to people like Lomborg, there are other credentials people who are more measured in their concern about climate change than the apocalyptic doomsday climate alarmist. While the overwhelming majority of credentialed climate experts accept the theory of climate change, that does not mean they are all doomsday alarmists.  

A change is taking place in the climate change debate. Recently, an international team of climate researchers published a major revision of the emissions scenarios used to study global warming.  This is a big deal. The new paper has raised questions about whether some of the risks of climate change have been poorly communicated or overstated in years past and how best to think about those risks going forward. This in no way means climate change is nothing to worry about, or is a hoax, or is not real. it does mean one can look at the issue with more realistic clarity rather than "the end is near" hysteria.

The New York Times recently reported on this change. To read that article, see Scientists Ditched a Scary Climate Scenario. What Now? - The New York Times.



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, May 25, 2026

Tennessee Smuggling Charges Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia Dismissed

Kilmar Abrego Garcia
by Kim Jarrett, The Center Square,  May 25, 2026 - A federal judge dismissed Tennessee charges against a man who, at one time, was at the center of the immigration debate.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia was charged with human smuggling in connection with a Tennessee traffic stop. Garcia was driving an SUV with eight passengers. One of the police officers believed that he was smuggling them, remarking that he was “hauling these people for money," according to a video obtained by The Center Square through an open records request.

U.S. District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw called the charges "vindictive" because Abrego Garcia challenged his deportation to El Salvador. 

"The objective evidence here shows that, absent Abrego’s successful lawsuit challenging his removal to El Salvador, the Government would not have brought this prosecution," Crenshaw wrote in his order. "The Executive Branch closed its investigation on the November 2022 traffic stop. Only after Abrego succeeded in vindicating his rights did the Executive Branch reopen that investigation."

The Trump administration mistakenly deported Abrego Garcia to El Salvador in March 2025 due to an administrative error, according to previous reporting from The Center Square. Prior to that, Abrego Garcia was living in Maryland and had been arrested on suspicion of involvement in MS-13 in 2019, after immigrating illegally to the United States as a teenager with his parents around 2011. Officials prepared to deport Abrego Garcia then, but an immigration judge granted him “withholding of removal,” believing his life would be in danger if he were returned to El Salvador. 

The Department of Justice did not immediately return a message from The Center Square about the case. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tennessee Takes Over Memphis Schools


by Melissa Brown, May 22, 2026, This story was originally published by Chalkbeat. Sign up for their newsletters at ckbe.at/newsletters
-  Gov. Bill Lee has signed legislation that will give political appointees sweeping authority over Memphis-Shelby County Schools.

The new law is an unprecedented effort to seize local control of Tennessee’s largest public school district through a nine-person oversight board appointed by the state’s top three Republicans, including the governor.

Lee announced his appointments shortly after signing the legislation, tapping five Shelby County residents, many of whom already sit on Tennessee governing boards.

The governor’s appointees include at least one member with intimate knowledge of the district’s inner workings: Dorsey Hopson, who served as Memphis superintendent from 2013 to early 2019.

The takeover effort now goes into effect just weeks after Memphis voters cast their ballots in the 2026 school board primary, an election for four contested board seats that now have significantly less power. And expected legal challenges to the takeover will also collide with another Republican supermajority effort to seize Tennessee’s last Democratic congressional district through a controversial redistricting measure that now significantly dilutes Memphians’ voting power.

The takeover oversight board has been tasked with conducting a comprehensive review of the district’s academic challenges. Republican supporters of the takeover have argued that progress is unacceptably stagnant after years of academic underperformance in the district that serves more than 100,000 students.

Last year, more than 75% of Memphis students failed to achieve proficiency in reading and math based on state standardized tests. However, Memphis schools earned the highest possible score in academic growth, or student improvement on state tests, for the fourth year in a row.

Opponents of the takeover have pointed to systemic socioeconomic issues in Shelby County as an inextricable factor in MSCS academic performance. Democrats have also argued the district has been harmed by the whiplash of state-imposed policies over the years, such as the failed Achievement School District, a previous state takeover of Memphis’ lowest performing schools.

The new oversight board will have nearly unlimited power to dive into district records, from teacher evaluations to curriculum reviews. It also will control the district’s largest financial decisions, the operating budget, and superintendent’s contract. Its power even extends to the Shelby County Commission, which will be blocked from approving the MSCS annual budget until the oversight board gives its approval.

The effective takeover of the district comes amid increasing tensions between Tennessee Republicans, a majority-white party with supermajority power in the state, and local leaders in Memphis, a longtime Democratic stronghold with a majority-Black population. Last year, Republicans imposed a state and federal law enforcement surge because of immigration and crime concerns, and GOP lawmakers in May rushed to split the county’s congressional district to better favor Republican candidates.

Rod's Comment: 
It is unfortunate that this occurs at the same time as the redistricting. I can understand why some Memphians might feel picked on. However, Memphis has been failing its citizens for a long time. The State has a responsibility for the education of Tennessee's children. I think the takeover is appropriate. 

Gov. Lee Announces Appointments to Educational Oversight Board for Memphis-Shelby County Schools

Office of the Governor, May 22, 2026 - Today, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed SB714 and announced appointees to the educational oversight board for Memphis-Shelby County Schools following official notice from the Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE) that the district meets the criteria established by the General Assembly for the creation of an educational oversight board.

“Every child deserves the opportunity to succeed, and throughout the Lee Administration, we’ve made significant investments to ensure students in Shelby County receive a quality education that best fits their unique needs,” said Gov. Lee. “I’m pleased to appoint these highly qualified individuals, and I’m grateful for their willingness to serve Memphis families and help strengthen outcomes for students across the community.”

The following Memphians have been appointed:

  • ·       Tyrone Burroughs, Chairman, First Choice Global and Founder, The Burroughs Foundation
  • ·       Dorsey Hopson, Partner, City Fund
  • ·       Shanea McKinney, Senior Advisor of Product Management, The Cigna Group
  • ·       Nisha Powers, Founder and President, Powers Hill Design
  • ·       Beverly Robertson, Co-Founder and COO, Trust Marketing and Communications

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, May 23, 2026

Perry County pays $835k to settle lawsuit after sheriff jailed man for 37 days over Trump meme

Larry Bushart and his wife. (Photo: LadyJay Creations LLC and FIRE)
by Adam Friedman, Tennessee Lookout, May 23, 2026-  A Perry County man, who was wrongly
detained for 37 days for posting a meme following the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, has settled the case for $835,000.

Larry Bushart was arrested by a Perry County Sheriff’s Office in September for posting a Facebook meme in a thread about a vigil honoring Kirk after he was shot and killed. 

Bushart’s meme included the quote “seems relevant today” and a picture of President Donald Trump, quoted as saying, “We have to get over it.” Under the quote, it said “President Donald Trump, one day after the Perry High School mass shooting.”

The meme is a reference to a 2024 school shooting in Iowa, not the Perry County High School in Tennessee. 

Sheriff’s deputies arrested Bushart, claiming the meme “threatening a mass shooting” at the local school, and had his bond set at $2 million, an amount he could not afford. 

Prosecutors dropped the charges against Bushart five weeks later after the news of the incident had been picked up nationally, and Perry County Sheriff Nick Weems admitted to NewsChannel 5 that he knew the meme referenced the Iowa shooting, even if the public didn’t.

The First Amendment rights organization, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, FIRE, represented Bushart in his lawsuit against Weems and the county.

“No one should be hauled off to jail in the dark of night over a harmless meme just because the authorities disagree with its message,” said Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with FIRE, in a news release. “Local law enforcement never should have forced him to endure this ordeal in the first place.”

Kirk’s death sparked a wide range of emotions. Communities around the country honored Kirk in for his conservative activism. But he was also known for his fierce defense of the Second Amendment and gun rights. Kirk in 2023 said “some gun deaths” were worth the cost to “protect our other God-given rights.”

His killing also led to a crackdown on speech. Leaders with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission tried to get late-night host Jimmy Kimmel’s show canceled after he criticized Kirk after the killing.

In Tennessee, FIRE also represented an Austin Peay State University professor who was initially fired for posts quoting Kirk. The organization helped him get reinstated and a $500,000 settlement. 

FIRE is also currently representing a former employee of a state commerce and insurance department who was fired for posts criticizing Kirk. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, May 22, 2026

Immune From Trump Retribution, Republicans May Now be Willing to Defy Trump.

by Rod Williams, May 22, 2026 - Finally! To put it crudely, it looks like Republicans are growing a pair. It is too early to know if it will stick, but Republicans seem ready to defy Trump. Ever since the start of Trump's second term, Republicans have rolled over and played dead. They have acted like puppy dogs yearning for that pat on the head. They have accepted massive corruption and trampling of the Constitution and policies that were anathema to long-held Republican values. It looks like establishing a $1.8 billion slush fund to reward violent January 6th insurrectionists and other Trump allies who will break the law on his behalf is a bridge too far. 

Trump just showed his power and his continued iron grip on the party on Tuesday, when senators Cassidy and Massie, two incumbent Republican senators who had dared cross Trump, were denied their party's nomination. Also on Tuesday, Trump endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn who had also proved insufficiently subservient to Trump.  Earlier in May, five of seven Republican state senators in Indiana who had opposed President Trump’s redistricting plan for that state were defeated by Trump-backed challengers. The message was clear: Cross Trump and he will crush you. 

So, Trump proved he can crush those who dare vote against him or question him. However, there are seven months left before these defeated senators leave office, and now they have nothing to lose. They are free to do the right thing. Maybe freedom is another word for nothing left to lose.  If a Senator wants to vote contrary to Trump's wishes or ask hard questions in committee, Trump is powerless to punish them. The filing deadline has passed for primary challengers to run against the incumbent. 

With Cassidy, and Massie, and more likely than not Cornyn, occupying their seat for seven more months after Trump defeated them in their primary, they are not going to be inclined to be too compliant with Trump's desires.   In addition to Cassidy, Massie, and probably Cornyn, who have nothing left to lose and with no love lost for Trump, you have Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Rand Paul, R-KY, who are always of questionable blind loyalty to Trump.

With Trump a lame duck, aggrieved senators in office, and other senators now immune to Trump retribution, maybe the Senate will now do the right thing. Maybe we have turned a corner. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Larry Bushart Jailed for Anit-Trump Tweet Wins $835K Settlement

Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), May 21, 2026 - Larry Bushart is a retired law enforcement officer and National Guardsman who believes, like many Americans, that free speech includes the right to react to the news — even when the moment is tense or controversial.

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s murder, Larry posted a meme on Facebook responding to the event. He did not commit violence. He did not threaten anyone. All he did was post an image of President Trump’s remark about a school shooting with the caption: “This seems relevant today.” 

But local authorities didn’t like what he said, so they arrested him.

Larry spent 37 days in jail on a $2 million bond for speech protected by the First Amendment. That’s the kind of treatment usually reserved for accused murderers and violent criminals. He lost his post-retirement job, missed his wedding anniversary, and the birth of his grandchild. In the United States, this should be unthinkable.

That’s why FIRE represented Larry in a lawsuit against the government for violating his constitutional rights and secured an $835K settlement on his behalf. 

For more than two decades, FIRE has defended Americans whose free speech rights were violated by those in power. From students and professors to journalists, parents, and everyday citizens, we step in when government officials abuse their authority to silence speech.

Larry Bushart
What happened to Larry isn’t just an attack on one person — it’s a warning about what happens when government power goes unchecked, and a preview of our future if we don’t stand up to defend everyone’s freedom of speech.

Stand for free speech. Stand with Larry.

Join the fight to ensure no one else is jailed for exercising their rights.

Rod's Comment
The above article doesn't mention it, but Larry Bushart is a Tennessee man. He was arrested in September 2025 by Lexington, Tennessee, police and jailed in Perry County.

What happened to Larry Bushart is an outrage. As we watch President Trump advance his authoritarian agenda, we can expect more of this. I know the pro-democracy side in this conflict with Trump authoritarianism often feels disheartened. The establishment of a $1.77 billion slush fund to reward those who commit violence or other crimes on Trump's behalf will embolden Trumpinista radicals. The defeat of the last vestige of traditional Republicanism in recent Republican primaries is depressing, and we can feel like authoritarianism is inevitable and there is no point in resisting. Especially for us conservatives and Republican exiles, the future of our nation looks bleak. It can often appear that the only choice is between Trumpian authoritarianism and corruption or progressive democratic socialism.  It can feel like we might as well withdraw from civic life and focus on hobbies, family, and entertainment. 

We shouldn't despair. There are victories, like this one. We can't afford to withdraw and give up. Too much is at stake. How much common cause we can make with the left can be a difficult decision. I have no illusion that many in the anti-Trump coalition are any more committed to the values I hold dear than are the Trumpinistas. Yet, there are things we can do. One is to support sane democrats if you can find them and traditional Republicans who have not sold their soul to Donald Trump, if can find them.  Another is to support real journalism so the truth of what is happening does not get buried by Trump media and Trump-adjacent media. Another is to support organizations like FIRE. They are fighting for free speech wherever it is threatened and are one of the organizations I support with my charitable giving. 

To donate to FIRE, follow this link


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Performative Posturing and Virtue Signaling at Last Night's Council Meeting

by Megan Podsiedlik, The Pamphleteer, May 20, 2026 - After Pro Tempore Delishia Porterfield
opened with her recurring reminder that “no one is illegal on stolen land that was built by stolen labor” and a visit from Doug the Pug, fomenting Starbucks baristas set the stage for last night’s Metro Council meeting.

“Starbucks doesn't want to actually meet their workers,” said a local Starbucks employee during last night’s announcement period. “They want Nashville's culture, they want our labor, they want our growth, our tourism, and our tax breaks. And while executives pose for cameras, baristas are being pushed harder than ever before; workers are dealing with impossible drive-thru times, severe understaffing, increasingly complicated drink builds, and now disciplinary threats over not writing one word on a cup.”

Yesterday, twenty council members signed onto a letter delivered by Councilmember Sean Parker to Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol requesting the company “finalize a fair union contract” before settling down in Nashville.

“We are proud to foster a pro-business climate in our city and state,” reads the document. “At the same time, we must be clear that being pro-business or lower-cost than other locations is not an invitation to take advantage of our residents, pay unlivable wages, or interfere with workers’ legal right to organize.”

Ginny Welsch
Guests of Councilmember Ginny Welsch continued to stir things up by using the invocation, a time usually set aside for prayer, for something a bit more unconventional.

“Many have observed that we in the South have inherited from our centuries of slavery a culture that punishes whoever acknowledges harm, usually far more harshly than those who inflict it,” said one speaker. “We have not overcome that inheritance yet, but we're working on it.”

“For the God who listens, thank you for hearing us,” said another guest. “I've seen you weep when skyscrapers and cameras and weapons and police budgets and business districts and Super Bowls and wealth accumulation are considered the pinnacles of human achievement.”

Vice Mayor Angie Henderson poured on the drama when reminding the body that the invocation does not have to be a religious prayer.

“And even though it has most frequently been a Christian prayer in this chamber, it does also bear reminding, after the events on the National Mall on Sunday and as our country celebrates its 250th year, that we are not, and we've never been a 'Christian nation,'” said Henderson. “Though many people in state and federal leadership and the social media managers that support them are trying to make people believe that to be true.”

The council proceeded and took a few shots at the state. Though members denounced a new law that strips Metro of its majority appointment power over the Airport Authority—calling it a “hostile takeover”—with no discussion, they did discuss the new congressional map before denouncing it as well.

“These maps were not drawn to reflect the people; they were drawn to control the people,” said Councilmember Zulfat Suara. “They were drawn because the protections that once prevented racial gerrymandering have been stripped away by the very court entrusted to uphold them.”

The council also passed a resolution asking NES to reassess its new tree-trimming practices but decided to defer the resolution denouncing the performance and leadership of the Electric Power Board once again.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Search by Address for Local, State, and Congressional district Assignments.

Use your address to find your new Congressional district. Click here



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Lamar Alexander Wants Republicans to Stand Up to Trump

Lamar Alexander
In a new memoir, the former senator, governor and cabinet member says President Trump committed an impeachable offense on Jan. 6 and calls on Congress to assert its power.

by Carl Hulse, New York Times, May 17, 2026 - Lamar Alexander played a crucial role in short-circuiting the first impeachment trial of President Trump when, as an influential Republican senator from Tennessee, he opposed calling witnesses and said the president’s attempts to pressure Ukraine didn’t meet the test for removal from office.

His role in the second impeachment might have been quite different had he remained in office just a few more weeks.

In his new memoir, “The Education of a Senator,” Mr. Alexander, 85, who is also a former governor, cabinet secretary and presidential candidate, writes with disgust about how the president exhorted the crowd that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and penetrated the Senate chamber in an effort to block certification of the election.

He asserts that the president undermined the Constitution and assaulted the hallowed concept of the peaceful transfer of power.

“If those actions do not constitute a ‘high crime or misdemeanor,’ I do not know what does,” Mr. Alexander wrote in the book, which is subtitled “From J.F.K. to Trump.”

...  he does render a verdict on the conduct of his former colleagues as Mr. Trump has steamrolled over a compliant Senate in his second term. He finds them guilty of failing to assert themselves as the Constitution intended.

“To me, the most disappointing difference between the first and second Trump terms was not what Trump did, but what the Senate majority did not do,” Mr. Alexander wrote. “Republican senators rarely checked abuse of presidential authority.” (read it all)


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Voting Rights Act Never Mandated Racial Districts

by Rod Williams, May 20, 2026 - While there has been outrage that the Supreme Court has made it possible for states to end racial Gerrymandering, I have not shared that outrage. Allowing states to draw Congressional district lines without carving out a Black district seems like an advance for democracy, not a step back.  This decision by the Court has been portrayed as a return to Jim Crow and an era when literacy tests and poll taxes disenfranchised African Americans. 

Let me be clear: I am disappointed with the Gerrymandering we are seeing. I would like professional planners to draw the lines based on a set of criteria that emphasize compactness, districts of shared interest, and historical identity. Counties and cities should only be split to the degree necessary to make each district of equal population. Of course, such a map of redrawn districts would still need to be adopted by the State legislature and perhaps some slight modification here and there could be made by legislators, but in general, the process would be guided by established criteria. Under this criterion, Nashville and Memphis would have members of Congress. I would also like for redistricting to occur only following a new census.

Since we do not have the process in place for the type of redistricting I prefer, I do not see the logic of saying all other districts can be sliced anyway you want, but Black voters should be entitled to a majority Black district. Some have made the argument that since Blacks make up 12.36% of the population, that percentage of Congress should be Black. Approximately 20% of the population is Hispanic, yet no one makes the argument that Hispanics should be guaranteed proportional representation in Congress. We don't have Catholic seats in Congress, nor Baptist seats, nor Women's seats, nor gay seats, nor seats for people younger than 30, and in my view, we should not.

The article below from Real Clear Politics makes the case that the Voting Rights Act never mandated creating racial Congressional Districts and mandating racial districts conflicts with the equal protection provisions of the 14th Amendment. 

Voting Rights Act Never Mandated Racial Districts

by Frank Miele, Real Clear Politics, May 20, 2026 - Ever since the recent decision of the Supreme Court limiting the use of race in drawing congressional districts, there has been a steady drumbeat of criticism claiming that the ruling somehow took away the rights of blacks and other minorities.

But nothing could be further from the truth.

As Justice Samuel Alito explained in his majority opinion, the prevailing interpretation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as requiring states to create congressional districts along racial lines actually undermined the constitutional rights of other citizens by colliding with the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Unfortunately, the legal language of Alito’s opinion is difficult for the average reader to penetrate, so it is worth stepping back and looking at the actual language of the Voting Rights Act itself. The part of the law at issue is Section 2. As originally passed in 1965, Section 2 simply said:

No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting, or standard, practice, or procedure shall be imposed or applied by any State or political subdivision to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.

This was a just and appropriate guarantee that no state could use devices such as literacy tests or other discriminatory practices to prevent citizens of a particular race from voting.

And in 1965, those concerns were tragically real. ...  it was not understood to require was racial engineering of congressional districts.

There was no suggestion in the original text that states would someday be expected to create congressional districts designed primarily around race in order to increase minority representation in Congress.

That interpretation arose largely after Congress amended Section 2 in 1982 ... The statute then adds an important limitation: Nothing in this section establishes a right to have members of a protected class elected in numbers equal to their proportion in the population. .. The revised Voting Rights Act never explicitly required states to create majority-minority congressional districts. Nor did it establish a right to proportional representation. ....

The Equal Protection Clause does not permit states to sort citizens primarily by race absent an extraordinarily compelling justification. ... Every state elects its senators statewide. In almost every state, minority voters routinely vote in elections where most candidates are white. Yet courts have never suggested that Senate elections violate the Voting Rights Act simply because minority voters do not always elect their preferred candidates.

... Contrary to the claims of critics, the court did not take away anyone’s right to vote. Nor did it repeal the Voting Rights Act. What it did was recognize that the Constitution places limits on how far government may go in using race as a political tool – even for ostensibly benevolent purposes. (to read it all follow this link)


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

 




Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, May 17, 2026

Don't Freak Out Over Republican Poll Watchers

by Rod Williams, May 16, 2026- I am concerned that Trump will try to steal the midterms, and nothing Trump may do will really surprise me. However, I am not panicked. Some things, such as what is now going on with redistricting, are breaking norms, but are not illegal. I don't like it, but it is not illegal, and Democrats are responding and doing mid-decade extreme gerrymandering themselves. I don't blame them; they have to fight fire with fire. So, no matter that many of us don't like this race to the bottom to see who can gerrymander best (or worst), it is not illegal. It is playing hardball. It is violating norms, but not laws.

I have almost no concern that some big, nefarious Elon Musk-controlled computer system is going to change ballots and give Republicans a win. When you go to vote, you go to one machine and make your selection. That is all that the machine does. It marks the ballot. Then you look at the ballot and make sure it accurately reflects the choice you made and then go and put that ballot in another machine, and that machine tabulates the votes. However, the paper ballot marked by the first machine and placed in the second machine is maintained, and should the tabulations be questioned, the ballots can be hand-counted. 

The truth is, we don't vote by computer. I think the way I described voting is pretty much the way it is done everywhere. Following Trump's loss of the 2020 election, he and his supporters claimed, and still claim, that the election was stolen. This involved claims that software or machines tied to Venezuela were used to “flip” votes in that election. Somehow, it involved links between Smartmatic, Dominion, and the Venezuelan government and somehow Italy was involved. It was all nonsense. Dominion and Smartmatic won big settlements for being falsely accused, and numerous court cases found no reason to doubt the integrity of the election.  Unfortunately, now some Democrats are beginning to sound like MAGA cult members. There may be reasons to be concerned that Trump may try to steal the midterms, but not by manipulating voting machines. 

Another thing I am not too concerned about is Republican poll watchers. I get fundraiser appeals from a group called Protect Our Democracy Fund. I don't believe I've sent them any money, and I'm not very familiar with them, but I'm on their mailing list. Today's fundraising appeal had a story about how the Republican National Committee announced on Tuesday of this week that it is deploying “poll watchers” and “election observers” to at least 17 states in what it calls a nationwide “election integrity” operation ahead of the 2026 midterms. This is supposed to concern me. I am not very concerned. I don't think "election observers" are official positions, and I'm not sure what they would do, but they couldn't do much. They couldn't do much or observe much on the outside of the polling place, and to get inside, they would have to be poll watchers. Now, I guess it is possible that the GOP is sending an army of J-6 type thugs to polling places to intimidate voters, but I doubt it. 

I have been a poll watcher several times, as a supporter of a candidate, as a supporter or opponent of a referendum, and as a poll watcher for the local Republican Party. Poll watchers can observe the poll workers and can look over their shoulder if they want, to make sure that id's are properly being checked and that people are not being influenced by a poll worker as to how to vote and that people who have a problem with being at the wrong voting place or who have had a name change since voting are properly denied voting or their vote is cast provisionally as the case may warrant. 

Sometimes it gets tricky. If a spouse is helping a partner who may have dementia vote, as a poll worker should you challenge the right of that person to vote?  My wife, Louella, had dementia for years before she passed away. I helped her vote in several elections.  I stopped once she declined to the point that I didn't feel like she was capable of making decisions. Her decline was slow, and early on, she certainly knew how she wanted to vote. No one ever challenged me in helping her vote. If they would have, I would have understood. 

Having worked as a poll watcher numerous times, I don't think I ever challenged anyone's right to cast a vote.  Because I was looking over the poll worker's shoulder and observing, the poll worker may have made someone cast a provisional ballot, whereas otherwise they might have just let them go ahead and vote, but I don't know that, and I sort of doubt it. The most significant thing I ever did as a poll watcher was make sure campaign workers observed the 100' boundary. Some campaign workers will try to walk voters to the door and violate the boundary limits. Another thing I sometimes did was ask a poll worker to enforce the prohibition on people entering the polling place wearing a campaign cap, shirt, or campaign button.  I'm not sure that really matters that much, but rules should be enforced. I don't think a poll worker ever intentionally allowed someone to wear campaign paraphernalia inside the voting place, but I was an extra set of eyes to point it out if someone did. 

I am somewhat concerned that Trump may post ICE agents at voting places with large Hispanic or immigrant populations. This would no doubt suppress the Hispanic turnout. There have been incidents of people who are in the country legally, even American citizens, being detained by ICE, so unless one has a burning desire to vote, why take the risk of showing up to vote if there are ICE agents at polling places? Given that ICE agents have murdered American citizen protestors, even non-Hispanic voters may decide not to vote it they know that ICE agents are at polling locations. So, I am concerned that having ICE agents at polling places could suppress turnout.

I am concerned that Trump may go big and try to steal the election. Before the midterms, Trump could send ICE to Democratic cities, and protests could occur, and then Trump would use the excuse that those cities were in a state of insurrection, impose martial, law and impose a lockdown on election day. We know Trump attempted a coup on January 6, 2021, so attempting to stop Democrats from winning the midterm is not far-fetched.

My biggest concern is that if Democrats win the midterm but only by a few seats, the House may refuse to seat enough members to ensure Republicans maintain their majority. Under Article I, Section 5 of the U.S. Constitution, each House of Congress is “the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members.” This means the House can, in theory, refuse to seat a new member if it determines the person does not meet the constitutional qualifications. Based on a 1969 Supreme Court case, the House is supposed to only refuse to seat a member if the person fails to meet the constitutional age, citizenship, or residency requirements. However, if the Speaker simply refused to seat the new member and alleged voter fraud as the reason, this would likely lead to a constitutional crisis, and the courts would have to intervene. I doubt this would succeed, but Speaker Johnson and House Republicans might attempt it.

So, while I am concerned that Republicans may try to steal the midterm, I have zero concern that voting machines will flip the votes and almost no concern that Republican poll watchers will somehow impact the outcome of an election. To ensure elections are conducted fairly, both Republicans and Democrats need to have poll watchers at polling places.

Also, to help ensure election integrity, both Republicans and Democrats should become poll workers. Poll workers are often retired people who serve out of a sense of civic responsibility. I have served as a poll worker, and it is a long, tiring day, and the pay is low. I am more confident of election integrity if there are both Republicans and Democrats serving as poll workers. There is always a shortage of poll workers. 

While each state sets the guidelines for conducting elections, I would assume that most states have rules for poll watchers similar to those we have in Tennessee.

Here are the poll watcher guidelines for Davidson County, Tennessee.

Who may appoint poll watchers?

Each political party – political party means an organization which nominates candidates for public office

Each candidate in a general or primary election

Any citizens’ organization interested in a question on the ballot

Any citizens’ organization interested in the integrity of the election process

How are poll watchers appointed?

A list of appointees must be submitted to the Davidson County Election Commission in writing and be signed by the person or organization authorized to make the appointment

The same person may be appointed to serve in more than one polling location

A poll watcher must be age seventeen (17) or older by Election Day

A poll watcher must be a resident of Tennessee, but does not have to live in Davidson County

Who may not be appointed as a poll watcher?

Anyone who is a candidate for an office on the ballot

The spouse of a candidate

When must appointments be submitted to the Davidson County Election Commission?

All poll watcher appointments must be submitted no later than NOON two (2) business days before serving as a poll watcher.

How must appointments be submitted to the Davidson County Election Commission?

Submit appointments by the deadline in one of the following ways:

Scan signed list and email to: helpvote@nashville.gov

Hand-deliver signed list to the Davidson County Election Commission Main Office:

Election Commission Office, 1281 Murfreesboro Pike, Third Floor, Nashville,TN 37217

What must a poll watcher do upon arriving at the polling place?

Show their poll watcher badge to the Poll Officer

Sign the Visitor Log and present photo ID

Wear the poll watcher badge provided by the Davidson County Election Commission at all times while in the polling place

What activities are permitted?

Watch and inspect performance in and around the polling place

Inspect the Technician's Certification

Speak to the Poll Officer

Challenge voters, through the Poll Officer

Present a protest of any aspect of the conduct of the election to the Poll Officer or Davidson County Election Commission

Be present during all proceedings at the polling place

What activities are prohibited?

Interfere with any voter in preparing or casting their ballot

Prevent election officials from performing their duties

Observe the giving of assistance to a voter

Wear campaign material of any kind during the performance of their duties as a poll watcher

Speak to voters; this includes greeting the voter or standing in the doorway where the voter enters

Exit the room of the Absentee Counting Board after the counting of ballots begins

Possess or use electronic devices when observing the duties of the Absentee Counting Board

May poll watchers engage in campaign activities?

No campaign activity is permitted inside the 100-foot boundary/inside the polling place

Campaign activities are allowed outside the 100-foot boundary/campaign-free zone

If you are a Democrat or a Republican or an independent and are concerned about election integrity, become a poll worker or a poll watcher. Don't freak out about the other party having their members serve as poll workers or poll watchers. The more watchers, the better.  




Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, May 16, 2026

300 Nashville Businesses Say Property Tax is Jeopardizing the Future

by Dennis Ferrier, Mon, WZTV  Fox 17, May 16, 2026 - The property tax hikes in Nashville have reached crisis levels, according to 300 Nashville businesses.

The Nashville Property Tax Coalition believes more than 100 local businesses could fail within the next two years because of historic increases in property taxes.

This is a list of 300 Nashville businesses.

Small businesses that survived recessions, inflation, labor shortages, and the day-to-day struggle of entrepreneurship.

But many now say they are facing a threat that their hard work and ingenuity cannot solve.

That threat, they say, is Metro Nashville government. (read more)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Donors Want Answers from Tennessee Congressman Andy Ogles: 'What Did You do With the Money?'

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, May 15, 2026

Andy Ogles Now Denies Raising $25,000 From Public for Children's Burial Garden

 

by Rod Williams, May 15, 2026 - Please watch this story. 

Andy Ogle is a disgusting, humane being, but that is the kind of people Trump likes. That is the kind of person Republican voters like. Morality is for suckers. It is all about getting what you can. It is all about power. If you are a Trump loyalist, Trump has your back. If Trump likes you, Trump voters like you. 

What did he do with the money? He lies and lies and lies. This is the world we live in. 

There was a time, a long time ago, before Trump, when America was different. Sure, we have always had scandals and charlatans and crooks, but they were the exception, and inflating your resume and making money off of dead babies would have been frowned upon.  Lying was frowned upon. There was a time when people who abused their office and did reprehensible things did it in secret. Now, they do it in the open for all the world to see with the smallest of fig leaf. There was a time when decency mattered. Andy Ogles is the face of the politician for the age of Trump. Unfortunately, I am not sure we are going back to a time when decency mattered. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

The Deck is Stacked in Andy Ogles Favor as Republicans Choose New Voters for Ogles

The New 5th
by Rod Williams, May 15, 2026-The redrawn newly adopted Tennessee Congressional maps have shifted the 5th Congressional seat to the west of Nashville, running through rural west Tennessee to the Mississippi River and south along the river to the outskirts of Memphis. As reported by The Tennessean, the new 5th Congressional district has only 17% of the same people as the current district. It looks like the district was purposely redrawn to improve Ogles chances for reelection. The new 5th includes none of Davidson County, where Ogles is unpopular and cuts Ogles ' strongest challenger out of the district. The new lines split Maury County and Columbia, putting Ogles in the district and cutting Columbia mayor Chaz Molder out of the district.

This is disappointing and disturbing. Politicians should not get to select their voters. I do not live in the 5th and cannot vote against Ogles even if the district lines had not changed, but would if I could. I had already sent Molder a modest contribution and was prepared to send more.  

Ogles is pathetic. It looks like he stays up late at night reading Trump's Truth Social post, so he can be the first to propose legislation the next morning to enact into law whatever insane weird thought Trump had at 2:30 AM during the night. Luckly none of it makes it into law, but Ogles gets some face time on Fox news and a pat on the head from Trump. Ogles has got to be Trump's number one lapdog, bootlicker, or whatever term you want to use to describe such subservient sycophant behavior. 

The Current 5th
I was excited that it was looking like Ogles could be defeated. I was excited that it looked like Democrats were going to choose a sensible moderate to challenge Ogles as opposed to some progressive woke nut-job, like they did when they chose Aftyn Behn as their candidate for the 7th Congressional District last year. Democrats had a chance to take the 7th but threw it away. 

Some time ago, I reached the conclusion that to stop Trump's authoritarian agenda, Democrats needed to retake the House. I live in the 7th and when there was a special election to fill the vacant seat for this district, I was prepared to vote for a Democrat and then the Democrat nominee turned out to be Aftyn Behn, and I just couldn't do it. I voted for Republican Van Epps. 

It looks like in the race against Ogles, Democrats were not going to make the same mistake they made in nominating Behn in the 7th. Molder looks like the kind of candidate that disaffected Republicans and independents could support. Unfortunately, Republican lawmakers have chosen a new set of voters for Ogles, and it will now be much harder to unseat him. 

Molder has been gaining momentum, and the more I have learned about him, the more I like him.  He has raised more than $1.8 million since he announced his candidacy and more that 85% of it came from Tennesseans. That is a lot of money. Congressman Ogles has only raised about $440,000. It was looking like Molder could actually beat Ogles. 

Molder has announced that he is still running for Congress in the 5th. Good for him. U.S. representatives are not required to live in the districts they represent. I am glad Ogles will have a strong challenger. Unfortunately, it is going to be even more of an uphill battle for Molder. The new district looks a lot safer for a Trumpinista Republican than did the old district. I will keep following this campaign and hope for Trump's popularity to continue to drop and that there is a blue wave big enough to sweep Andy Ogles out of office, but the new maps make it much harder to unseat America's worst congressman. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Former Mayor of Nashville Megan Barry Picks up Petition to Run for TN Congressional District 6

Megan Barry
by Rod Williams, May 13, 2026- Megan Barry, the former disgraced mayor of Nashville, has picked up a petition to run for the newly redrawn Tennessee Congressional District 6, the one Rep. John Rose currently occupies.  Since John Rose is running for governor, there will be no incumbent running in that district.

You may recall the Barry scandal. She was caught having an affair with her police bodyguard. They had gone on lavish trips together on the taxpayer's dime, and he had been paid a lot of overtime for providing security for the mayor.  In March 2018, following weeks of news coverage and speculation regarding her future, Barry pleaded guilty to a Class C felony in Nashville criminal court as part of a plea bargain. Following her guilty plea, Barry resigned as mayor. 

Barry has since tried to resurrect her political career several times. In 2023, Barry announced that she would run in Tennessee's 7th congressional district against incumbent Republican Mark Green. Green had announced that he would not run for reelection following accusations of infidelity during his divorce proceedings but changed his mind after Donald Trump urged him to stay in the race. He won the general election over Barry with approximately 60% of the votes.

I am not sure that Barry's previous felony conviction and her sordid affair would hinder her political resurrection. Americans in general are much less concerned about sexual morality or marital infidelity than they once were. Also, Americans have become accustomed to massive corruption, as exemplified by Donald Trump. Many voters love Trump despite his lack of morality. Barry's affair and related crimes seem quaint by comparison. Trump has kind of made all politicians scandal-proof. 


I don't know what her chances of victory in a race would be. As of now, we don't even know who her opponent would be. The district is mostly rural, and all districts are drawn to be Republican majority districts. I don't know how she would be received among rural conservative voters. Time having passed since her scandal will make her less of a pariah; however, the passage of time dampens her name recognition and the depth of political connections. 

For more on this, follow this link.  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

This is Not What Democracy Looks Like


by Rod Williams, May 12, 2026- Last week the state legislature voted to adopt new Congressional maps, which eliminated Tennessee's only Congressional seat held by a Democrat.  On the one hand, I am disappointed. I want to see Dems take the House in the midterm because I want Donald Trump's authoritarian agenda and policies to be derailed and I want to see Congressional oversight and investigation of Trump's massive corruption and other misdeeds.   On the other hand, I think it is time to end racial gerrymandering. I want to see racial preferences and carve-outs end. It is time to stop discriminating on account of race. This post is not about the merits of that issue, however.

If you watch the news, you have seen reports of the disruptions in the Tennessee House chambers during the proceedings. This is a disgrace. Any sympathy I had for those who felt the adoption of these new maps was a reimposition of Jim Crow evaporated in light of the disgraceful demonstrations in the House, both from guests in the gallery and in the halls outside the chamber, and from legislators inside the chamber. In the chambers of the legislative body, there is no place for foghorns, banners, marches, or standing on one's desk with banners. 

Legislative deliberations should occur in a calm, dignified, respectful manner. Robert's Rules and House protocol should be observed. The rules exist for a reason. Those who violate the rules of the House should be expelled. When observers become participants and unruly, they should be removed. I know the House has expelled members before for inappropriate behavior, and the legislator was reelected. So be it. Expel them again.

Years ago, I had to sit in court numerous times due to an ongoing battle with my crazy ex-wife, who wanted to deny me visitation with my daughter and make my life miserable. While awaiting my case to be heard, I had a bailiff make me put away a newspaper I was reading.  I have seen people expelled from the courtroom and their cases rescheduled because they were dressed inappropriately.

While serving in the Metro Council, I have seen large crowds of agitated spectators in the chamber, passionate over a zoning proposal, a budget cut, or a tax increase. Order was maintained. Waving signs was prohibited and an outburst would lead to an admonition from the Chair and a threat to clear the chamber. Even applause was prohibited.

I would like to see the House impose the same kind of decorum as I witness in a courtroom or the Metro Council chamber. Democracy requires the ability to conduct business in a calm, deliberative manner. A deliberative body should not have to function in a climate of mob hysteria. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Debt Disaster Denialists Think America Has a New Magic Bullet

by Mitch Daniels, The Washington Post, May 12, 2026 - For years, I kept a favorite cartoon in my desk and pulled it out to open the annual business-plan meeting at the unit I led. It showed a frazzled executive standing in front of a screen displaying his multiyear sales projections. The line ran straight horizontally, close and parallel to the x-axis, almost to the right edge, where it leaped steeply upward, next to a label that said, “Miracle happens here!”

No impulse is more human than wishfulness, the tendency to grasp at any straw that enables us to avert our eyes from difficult realities and put off facing them. Members of America’s national political class personify this failing, in their continuing practice of fiscal denialism. Even as the inexorable arithmetic piles up, those responsible for the nation’s economic future and national security fasten on imaginary miracles to justify a gross default of their duty of stewardship.

A decade ago, as the national debt surged toward the once unthinkable level of $20 trillion (now nearing $40 trillion), denialists took brief refuge in an alchemist fantasy that called itself Modern Monetary Theory. The notion that a nation could borrow without limit, forever, in its own fiat currency was quickly demolished by full-spectrum critiques, in venues ranging from the Cato Institute to the Review of Keynesian Economics. ... 

In our post-truth world, facts aren’t as stubborn as they used to be, but the most obstinate of all are the mathematical ones. They tell us not to rely on even the powerfully positive impact of these new technologies to spare us the radical adjustments that a generation of procrastination has now made inevitable.

... What’s not credible is the idea that even an AI-led productivity surge can suffice to offset our decades of dereliction. ... This is no time to be touting miracle cures to justify further procrastination. Until America acts to make major changes in laws on the books, the right side of our national business-plan chart will continue to show a sharp downward line and the label, “Big trouble happens here.” (read it all)

Mitch Daniels is a senior adviser to the Liberty Fund, president emeritus of Purdue University, a co-chair of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and a former governor of Indiana.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, May 11, 2026

Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand America as a Creedal Nation.

Mark Rogers
by Mark Rogers, Facebook, April 11, 2026- Reason wades into the debate over the true nature of America with a rousing defense of Justice Gorsuch and his comments about America being a 'creedal' nation. That is to say, America is based on certain propositions such as 'Equality,' 'Inalienable Rights,' and 'self-rule.' It is, in this view, not about race or religion, or land or language or culture. 

I do take some issue with Justice Gorsuch on the question of 'culture.'  I think that while America was not based on one specific culture, that has more to do with the diversity of cultures within the nations that first came here from Europe. The English brought the cultures of various peoples from the city of London to the moors of Scotland and the forests of Wales and the green fields of Ireland. (For more information on this, read Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fischer.) 

Germans came here well before the Revolution from the various states of that area, bringing their own cultures. French Protestants and Catholics were here along with the Spanish and Portuguese. 

While all these featured highly individualistic local cultures, all were, at their cores, profoundly shaped by Western Civilization. In that sense, America was dramatically shaped by one culture but one with many faces. And one of the West's greatest achievements by 1787 was the idea that successful nations needed to generally tolerate different cultures and religions. 

What America wasn't in its beginning and never has been is the property of one group, not based on birth or religion or language or philosophy. Like Western Civilization itself, America absorbs new People and new Ideas and new Beliefs and moves on while remaining true to our fundamental creedal Ideas.

Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand What Makes America Great

Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch
by Stephanie Slade, Reason, May 9, 2026 -The Dissident Right is furious after Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch told Reason and several other outlets that America is a "creedal nation."

"The Declaration of Independence had three great ideas in it," Gorsuch said in a recent interview with Nick Gillespie. "That all of us are equal; that each of us has inalienable rights given to us by God, not government; and that we have the right to rule ourselves. Our nation is not founded on a religion. It's not based on a common culture, even, or heritage. It's based on those ideas. We're a creedal nation."

...  The belief in a "civic" nationalism—the idea that the United States is a "propositional nation," as the Catholic theologian John Courtney Murray put it, rather than one based on blood and soil—is mainstream among Americans of all stripes, including conservatives. ... 

.... there are elements of culture that must represent a consensus if the Republic that the Founders bequeathed us is to endure. First and foremost, we need a culture of mutual forbearance, where people want to coexist peacefully even with those who see things differently, and where people take pride in the ideals of human liberty and equal treatment under law, recognizing that America's commitment to those ideals is a large part of what makes it great. 

...  the Dissident Right, which rejects the very notion of mutual forbearance in favor of a "will-to-power" political approach, doesn't have the answer. You can't save America's culture by sacrificing its creed. (read more)

Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics.  He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories