Tuesday, June 09, 2026

Where's My Sidewalk?

From Megan Podsiedlik, The Pamphleteer, June 9, 2026 - Mayor Freddie O’Connell’s pitch was “Sidewalks, Signals, Service, and Safety,” in that order. That said, three-quarters of CHYM’s sales tax revenue is going toward WeGo bus services in FY 2027. Why? Because that’s the way the plan was written. 

“The legal structure under which we're allowed to collect it says that we had to make a transportation improvement plan that said, 'These are the projects and this is how we're going to spend it,'” explained CHYM Chief Program Officer Sabrina Sussman during last week's meeting.

Sussman says Nashville will get the “86 miles of sidewalks, 600 traffic signals, 39 miles of complete streets, and really bountiful changes to WeGo” promised in the referendum.

WeGo will never be self-sufficient 
Council Member Tasha Ellis asked whether CHYM and NDOT will ever be consolidated and completely funded by sales tax revenues in order to free up the general fund dollars traditionally earmarked for public transit. The answer was a resounding no.

“We do not envision a future where the general fund does not contribute at all to WeGo,” said Sussman. “Part of what was happening is the general fund obligations and needed investments were rising faster than the general fund was, and so this dedicated revenue allows you to still make those investments [and] really support the system without that increased burden back on the general fund. But we are not going to move to a place where the general fund isn't funding WeGo at all.”

What has your sales tax gotten you so far?
CHYM Finance Manager Andrew Walczak explained how CHYM’s FY2026 operating budget was spent.

“To date, we're just under $51.4 million, and it's worth noting that about $48 million of that $51.4 [million] has gone to direct transit services by WeGo,” said Walczak.

This includes the Journey Pass program, which has enrolled 11,000+ riders who will receive free WeGo rides for the next three years. That money has also gone toward expanded routes, more frequent service, and WeGo Link zones.

Sidewalks and signals 
So far, only one sidewalk project has been completed.

“Our first sidewalk funded through Choose How You Move was completed recently at Edge O Lake Drive,” said NDOT Interim Deputy Director Derek Hagerty.

Two other sidewalk projects are currently under construction, and four more are about to come online. 

As for smart signals, officials started with the 115 signals that are easiest to upgrade.

“Eighty-three of those are downtown; 32 are on Nolensville and Harding Place,” said Hagerty.

That said, delivering similar upgrades to all 592 signals included in the CHYM plan may prove to be a challenge on streets where fiber installation is needed.

Airport routes aren't taking off quite yet. Several council members inquired about WeGo services connecting riders to the airport. According to officials, hour-long bus trips are still a deterrent when people are choosing how to manage travel plans. 

“We used to run some of the trips express, and we found them to be very low patronage,” explained WeGo CEO Steve Bland. 

Bland says the future corridor planned for the airport extension is more promising: “The more streamlined service would be the Murfreesboro Pike all-access corridor, which would extend along Donaldson to the airport with very frequent service, more limited stops, and kind of a direct shot into the downtown court.”

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Trustees Warn Social Security and Medicare Are Approaching Insolvency

by Rod Williams, June 9, 2026- As one of my musical heroes sang, "we are rolling downhill like a snowball headed for hell."  

No one seems to care. Not no one exactly, but very few. I am not talking about the prospect of North Korea soon having improved nuclear weapons capable of hitting the United States or the increasing acceptance of ideologies detrimental to our continuing as a democratic republic, or climate change, or any number of other political or international trends. I am talking about the pending economic collapse of the United States. 

The thing that is going to be a great leap forward in this catastrophe is right around the corner and that is the approaching insolvency of the Social Security Trust fund. It will be empty in six years. When it is empty, there will be an automatic cut in benefits of 22%. Do I think there will really be a cut of 22%? No. Congress will not allow that. Congress will fund the SS deficit out of general revenues. The problem is that we are already constantly running deficits. We already spend more than we take in each year. So, to fund the SS deficit, the US will increase the budget deficit. We will borrow more money, adding to the national debt.

The problem with doing that is that we have about reached the point where we have no more borrowing capacity unless we increase the amount of interest we pay to borrow. Already, interest on the debt is the second-largest component of the federal budget, outpacing all other spending categories except Social Security.  Payment of interest on the debt is mandatory. It is not something we can decide to cut. We have very little wiggle room.

While a country is not exactly like a household, as a country, we are much like the household that has borrowed so much money that its greatest monthly expenditure is interest- car payment interest, house payment interest, credit card interest. We are like the household that has trouble buying groceries or keeping the lights on because so much of our current income goes to paying debt and the only way we keep afloat is to borrow more this month to pay last month's bills and we are using the credit card to buy groceries and pay the electric bill. 

In fiscal year 2024, the U.S. paid $1.13 trillion in gross interest on the debt. This amount is more than the combined budgets for national defense, Medicare, veterans, education, transportation, and science. 

The U.S. is still a strong economic power. The reasons we have been able to maintain a strong military and expand the welfare state without paying for it is because other countries want our debt. We are the tallest midget in the room. We are the world's reserve currency. That is not ordained and could change. There are troubling signs that it is changing. Now, when the US refinances debt, we are more and more refinancing long-term debt with short-term debt. That is a troubling sign. 

The only alternative to borrowing is to monetize the debt, which means borrowing from the Federal Reserve or euphemistically printing more money. This is not a good alternative and can lead to out-of-control inflation. 

While I think Trump's economic policies are bad, especially his tariff policy and some of the things in the so-called Great Big Beautiful Bill, this problem cannot be blamed on him. Both parties have led us to this point, and we have known of this coming SS insolvency for decades. This is not something that just snuck up on us. 

I know the immediate response I will get to this is that Congress should pay back the money that it stole from Social Security. That is BS. It didn't happen. Another response is that we need to cut the waste and abuse, and immigrants who are getting Social Security. Again, the waste and abuse are minuscule, and if anything, immigrants make the problem less bad, not worse. People look for scapegoats, but the truth is, we wanted a generous welfare system and did not want to pay for it. Well, the day of reckoning is near, and the Social Security trust fund going bust is going to be a great leap forward on our road to economic ruin. Some things could be done now to avoid this coming catastrophe, but I don't see any appetite for doing them. We are rolling downhill, like a snowball headed for hell. 

See the below from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget:

.

Trustees Warn Social Security and Medicare Are Approaching Insolvency

 Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, June 9, 2026- The Trustees for Social Security and Medicare just released their annual reports, showing a significant deterioration in the financial states of both trust funds. They project that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund – which funds retirement benefits – will be insolvent in 2032, and the theoretically-combined Social Security Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance trust fund will run out in 2034. Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI), meanwhile, is estimated to face insolvency in 2033.

Insolvency of these programs would result in steep across-the-board cuts. When the Social Security retirement fund runs out of reserves, beneficiaries will face an abrupt 22% cut; Medicare insolvency would lead to an 11% cut in payments, undermining access to care. Our No State Spared report estimates the state-by-state impact of a similarly-sized cut if it occurred today.

Over 75 years, the Trustees project both programs face shortfalls significantly larger than last year’s projection. The Trustees project the Social Security programs face a combined 4.42% of taxable payroll shortfall – up 16% from last year; they project the Medicare HI shortfall is 33% larger than last year, at 0.56% of payroll.

You can find our preliminary analysis of both reports here. Register for our virtual event, “Checking in on the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds” featuring a conversation with Social Security’s Chief Actuary Karen Glenn on Wednesday, June 10 at 2:00pm ET here. Full analysis of these reports are forthcoming.

The following is a statement from Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget: 

Washington is sleepwalking into a retirement crisis, allowing our nation’s most important trust funds to go insolvent at the expense of over 70 million beneficiaries who count on these programs. 

In just six years – during the next Senate class’s term – Social Security’s retirement fund will run out of money. Medicare will run out just half a year later. Today’s youngest retirees will be turning 68 when Social Security runs dry and 69 when Medicare does. Yet our leaders have no plan to prevent the abrupt 22% benefit cut or 11% payment cut that would ensue.

Politicians have known about and neglected these programs for 40 years now. But the problem is much worse now. Thanks to decades of inaction, solutions like eliminating the taxable maximum or progressive price indexing benefits are no longer close to enough to restore solvency. And thanks mainly to the tax cuts in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” and worsening demographics, Social Security’s projected shortfall is a full 16% worse than last year’s. Medicare’s shortfall is 33% worse.

Instead of talking about solutions to these real funding problems, leaders in Washington instead demagogue each other over the issue, with both sides promising not to touch the programs. Unfortunately, that promise is a tacit endorsement of the across-the-board cuts that will happen at exhaustion – an unacceptable outcome. No state would be spared from the consequences of failure to save these programs from insolvency – each and every member of the House and Senate has constituents that rely on the programs.

There’s no shortage of options out there to avoid this – we’ve put forward several novel ideas in recent months for starters. But enacting solutions requires political will.

It’s time for our leaders to start telling the truth on Social Security and Medicare, and working on real plans to save these programs. Time is running out.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, June 07, 2026

James Talierico Questions Authur of the FURRIES Act


by Rod Williams, June 7, 2026- You've got to watch this. It is unbelievable that such a dumb thing is being debated in the Texas House. Rep. James Talerico does an excellent job pushing back against this craziness. 

The issue before the House is the F.U.R.R.I.E.S Act. an act Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Educational Spaces.  It would "prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being." The exempt days are Halloween and maybe some other days listed in the bill, but there cannot be more than five such days a year.

Under this act, schools cannot let kids wear animal collars or lick themselves, and the most bizarre part is that it prohibits schools from providing litter boxes for kids who think they are cats. Wow! There must be an epidemic of kids thinking they are cats if the state legislature has to pass a law to address the issue. Actually, there is zero evidence that kids pretending to be animals even exist in Texas.

One might think one nut-job introduced this bill and make excuses. Sometimes that happens. A lone legislator may introduce any stupid thing he wants. When I served in the Metro Council, there was a Black councilman from north Nashville who was as dumb as a box of rocks. He introduced a memorializing resolution calling on the city to build a welcoming landing pad for space aliens. The act was quickly tabled, but not until after the sponsor defended it and the motion to table was explained. This didn't amount to much, yet this story made national news. I thought this FURRIES Act in Texas may be something similar to Nashville welcoming space aliens. Wrong! 

The FURRIES Act has 56 co-sponsors! All of the co-sponsors are Republicans. The Texas House has 150 members. Republicans hold 88 of those seats and Democrats 62. Let that sink in: 56 of 88 Republicans voted for an act prohibiting school children from acting in a manner consistent with thinking they are animals and prohibiting Texas schools from accommodating them.  

What has happened to Republicans? I know stupidity can run in both parties, but all of my adult life, I thought the Republican Party was the smarter and more serious of the two parties. Now, Republicans keep outdoing themselves in saying and proposing stupid things. The bill's current status is "left pending in committee," so I don't know if that means it could still be acted upon or is dead for this session. 

I am more and more skeptical of Republicans' fight on social issues. I wonder if there really is a problem with high school boys identifying as trans and playing in women's sports. Is there a problem with trans girls using the girls' bathroom? I doubt there really is a problem with porn in school libraries. I wonder how often it really occurs that a teacher calls a child by their preferred pronoun and the parent doesn't know. I wonder how often a teacher has displayed a Pride flag in the classroom. If any of these things have occurred, I wonder if the issue could not have been dealt with at the classroom, school, or schoolboard level. 

I am more and more having the feeling that Republicans are swatting at gnats that don't even exist.




Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories