Saturday, October 25, 2025

Beacon’s $1.4 Million Stormwater Settlement Receives Preliminary Court Approval. For Refund, Apply Before Nov.13.

 BY BEN STORMES, The Beacon Center, Oct. 25, 2025 -Beacon is excited to share a major development in our legal challenge against Nashville’s stormwater capacity fees. On July 18, 2025, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee preliminarily approved a $1.4 million class action settlement, a crucial step forward in securing justice for 361 homeowners who were unfairly charged fees before receiving building permits.

This case began with homeowners like Peyton Pratt, who was forced to pay thousands of dollars simply for seeking to expand his home for his growing family. Beacon is proud to represent Mr. Pratt free of charge, and thanks to his courage and the support of others, hundreds of property owners are now closer to receiving the refunds they deserve.

As part of the settlement, the city will issue full refunds to affected property owners. Within 28 days of the court’s order, each eligible homeowner will receive a notice and claim form by mail, along with a prepaid envelope to return it. To claim a refund, completed forms must be submitted by November 13, 2025, either by email or by mail to the address provided in the notice and posted below.

Metro Water Services
ATTN: Shawna Rodriguez: Pratt v. Metro Settlement
P.O. Box 196300
Nashville, TN 37219
E-mail: mws.swavailability@nashville.gov

The city has also posted on its website, providing instructions, contact information, and an electronic submission option for the claim form.

Because this is a class action settlement, a final fairness hearing is scheduled for October 30, 2025. If the Court stamps its final approval on the settlement, property owners who submitted their claim forms via mail or electronic submissions will be entitled to a full refund. Beacon will provide further updates here after the final hearing.

For the order granting preliminary approval of class action settlement, click here.

If you are a property owner who paid the stormwater capacity fee and have any questions, please contact: Wen Fa at wen@beacontn.org, or Ben Stormes at ben.stormes@beacontn.org.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, October 24, 2025

Canada Uses the Voice and Words of Ronald Reagan to Argue Against Tariffs. Trump Halts Talks.


by Rod Williams, Oct. 24, 2025- Late yesterday, Donald Trump halted trade talks with Canada over the above ad. This is how the Wall Street Journal reported it:
President Trump said late Thursday he was terminating trade negotiations with Canada, pointing to a television advertisement sponsored by the Ontario government that features Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.

“Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post shortly before 11 p.m.

The president claimed that Canada “fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.” Trump argued the ad was designed to interfere with the Supreme Court and other courts as they weigh the legality of his far-reaching tariffs. (To read the rest of the story, follow this link)
This is just nuts! The Supreme Court is not influenced by a Canadian television advertisement. Ideally, the Supreme Court should not be influenced by the news or public opinion, and I think for the most part they are not. Trump is just a petulant child who cannot tolerate criticism. He can dish it out, but sure can't take it. 

Before Donald Trump, free trade was a bedrock principle of conservatism. For the most part, the post-depression position of the United States was for free trade and a reduction of tariffs. When anyone did argue for protectionism, it was usually a Democrat, but for the most part, there was a consensus that free trade was advantageous to the United States and the world. There was always, however, a kind of populist support for protectionism, but wiser, more informed viewpoints prevailed. Now, of course, the Republican Party has become the party of protectionism. The wise voices have been sidelined and the populists are in charge. While many a Trumpinista still say they revere Ronald Reagan, they subscribe to almost none of the positions he advocated. They get annoyed when it is pointed out that Trmpinistas are not the heirs of Reaganites. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

The Practical Case for Protecting Free Speech

Justine Owen
by Justine Owen, The Beacon Center, originally published Oct. 2, 2025-  In the wake of the awful assassination of Charlie Kirk, we are learning a great deal about the First Amendment’s protection of free expression. Our VP of Legal Affairs, Wen Fa, has a great post about the importance of protecting our First Amendment rights as part of our First Principles Series. To follow up on that piece, I wanted to provide a practical take on why protecting free speech is one of the most important things we can do. 

First of all, it’s important to clarify what is and is not protected by the First Amendment. The amendment, like all constitutional protections, shields us against government infringement on our rights. Our Founders knew—and witnessed firsthand under British rule—that government restrictions on our ability to speak freely and express our ideas were a dangerous proposition. They therefore enshrined in the First Amendment limitations on government’s ability to restrict our speech. Especially in this era of partisan divide, speech that’s applauded by some is often deplored by others. Once we allow government to dictate what is and is not protected speech versus what can be censored, we allow those in positions of power to be the subjective arbiters of what we say. And that is a slippery slope into tyranny, something our Founders knew all too well could destroy our American ideals. 

On the other hand, the First Amendment does not protect us against all the ramifications of our speech. While the government is limited in what it can do to punish us for our speech, those protections don’t extend into the private sphere. Thus, when people openly celebrate violence by saying things like Charlie Kirk “got what was coming to him,” their speech is not protected insofar as their employment and other associations. They can freely speak their minds, however abhorrent, without risking government punishment. But they can be reprimanded and even fired by their employers for doing so. Just as you have the freedom to associate with those who share your values, individuals who run businesses have the right to disassociate with those who contradict the values for which they stand. And being fired by a private actor for speaking is not a First Amendment violation. 

While many on the political left have learned this lesson the hard way in recent weeks, I appeal to those on the political right to learn the limits the First Amendment places on government just the same. When Attorney General Pam Bondi pledged to prosecute “hate speech” in response to Kirk’s murder, she crossed the line into government censorship of speech that is, in fact, protected by the First Amendment. Allowing the president, the attorney general, or any government official to decide what is and is not objectionable speech is expressly what our Constitution is designed to prevent. What is acceptable speech to our leaders currently in charge will undoubtedly be defined as objectionable and punishable by leaders with opposing political views when they take power. You may be OK with what today’s leaders want to punish as “hate speech”; I can assure you that one day you won’t be. Perhaps even your own speech might one day be deemed hateful and therefore punishable by government if you allow someone else’s to be today. 

Fortunately for all our sakes, we have a First Amendment that has withstood the test of time by protecting all speech, not just that which those in power accept as permissible. And it’s up to each of us to defend that principle, even when we don’t like what we hear. 

Justin Owen is the President & Chief Executive Officer of the Beacon Center of Tennessee and Beacon Impact.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, October 23, 2025

Tennessee is Worst in Nation for Opioid Abuse. Why?

by Rod Williams, Oct. 23, 2025 -According to 2024 data from FAIR Health, Tennessee had the highest rate of opioid use disorder diagnoses among commercially insured patients in the United States. 

FAIR Health's Opioid Tracker revealed 1,447 commercially insured patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder per 100,000, in 2024.

The ongoing opioid epidemic has been a major health concern in Tennessee for years, and the new data shows that the problem continues and is worsening. 

The information from Fair Health is only for commercially insured patients. If it included the uninsured or those on TennCare, the rate would be much higher. 

Tennessee is among the states most severely impacted by the opioid crisis, marked by high rates of overdose deaths, substance use disorders, and associated social consequences. The epidemic has progressed through phases, from an oversupply of prescription opioids to an increase in heroin use and, currently, a dramatic rise in synthetic opioids, particularly illicit fentanyl. 

In 2023, 3,985 Tennesseans died from drug overdoses, with 75% of these involving an opioid. Overdoses now claim more lives in Tennessee than motor vehicle accidents and homicides combined.

Fentanyl and other synthetic opioids are the primary drivers of recent overdose deaths. In 2022, over two-thirds of all drug overdose deaths in Tennessee involved fentanyl.

Overprescribing is a major driver of the drug epidemic in Tennessee. Despite state efforts to limit access, more opioid prescriptions are written annually than there are people living in Tennessee.

The epidemic has hit different areas of the state disproportionately. For example, East Tennessee has historically had the highest opioid consumption rates, and Northeast counties reported high rates of overdose deaths in 2022. 

The epidemic strains healthcare systems, is a factor in children being placed in state custody, and has led to a significant rise in drug-related incarcerations. In 2021, over 700 babies were born with opioid withdrawal symptoms. 

This is discouraging. It is not as if the State is not attempting to do something about it.  Tennessee's Opioid Abatement Council was established in law by the Tennessee General Assembly to decide how to best spend dollars received from lawsuits related to the opioid crisis. A lot of money is available to combat the epidemic, and it is being spent, yet the opioid abuse continues to grow.

Why is Tennessee the worst state for drug abuse? Income may be a factor. We are the 42nd in income. While the correlation between income and drug abuse is not direct, most of the states with high rates of drug abuse are lower-income states. 

While Tennessee is the most drug-addled state in the Union, America as a whole is the most drug-addled developed country in the world, yet America is the richest country in the world. Why does America have such a problem and why does Tennessee?  I am not sure we know.

The biggest current drug problem in America is fentanyl, and the US is focused on stemming the supply. We act as if somehow someone had a gun to our head and was making us take these drugs. I want the supply steemed, however, there would be no supply if there was no demand. The problem is not China or Mexico; it is us. It is disheartening.


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Gross National Debt Reaches $38 Trillion

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Oct 22, 2025 - The gross national debt of the United States reached $38 trillion yesterday, according to the U.S. Treasury. This comes little more than two months after the gross debt reached $37 trillion in mid-August. The quick pace of debt buildup is largely attributable to delayed borrowing while the debt ceiling was close to being breached and extraordinary measures prolonged it from January through July.

The following is a statement from Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget: 

It’s tough to decide what the most appalling part is of today’s announcement from the Treasury: that we surpassed an unprecedented $38 trillion in gross national debt; that we’ll likely hit the next milestone in just a matter of months; or that we are getting this news amid a government shutdown with seemingly no end in sight.

While nominal gross federal debt may not be the most meaningful measure of our fiscal health, the rest of our fiscal situation is just as bleak. Debt held by the public – economists’ preferred measure of debt – is already as large as our entire economy, beyond any point outside of a world war. The deficit last fiscal year, which ended just a few weeks ago, was $1.8 trillion and is headed towards $2 trillion annually over the coming decade. And we’re on course to spend $1 trillion just on interest payments on the national debt this year, exceeding our spending on our national defense. Something has to give – and eventually it will, whether we are prepared for it or not.

The reality is that we’re becoming distressingly numb to our own dysfunction. We fail to pass budgets, we blow past deadlines, we ignore fiscal safeguards, and we haggle over fractions of a budget while leaving the largest drivers untouched. Social Security and Medicare, for example, are just seven years from having their trust funds depleted – and you don’t hear anything from our political leaders on how to avoid such a disaster.

Policymakers have a choice: they can continue to abdicate the most basic responsibilities of budgeting, or they can finally confront the worsening fiscal situation before it’s too late.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, October 21, 2025

ABOUT THOSE DRUG BOATS

Ralph Bristol
by Ralph Bristol, Facebook, Oct. 21,2025- …we hit #7 yesterday

If you heard an argument that went something like this, whose side would you take? The argument is about those boats we’re blowing up off the coast of Venezuela, allegedly piloted by narco-terrorists, trafficking Fentanyl to the U.S. 

Guy #1 –"The first one had 11 people aboard. Would you really need 11 people to smuggle drugs? Or was the number of people an indication that the boat was actually involved in human trafficking?”

Guy #2 – “Does it matter?  One is almost as bad as the other?

Guy #`1 – “National security officials told Congress during a closed briefing in September that the boat “had turned around and was heading back to shore” and “was fired on multiple times by the U.S. military after it had changed course.” 

Guy #2 – “So what, they tried to kill us, and we killed them first.  You can’t just turn around and run if you’re the enemy and expect the other side to stop shooting.  We told them it was a war and warned them what to do if they don’t stop.  They haven’t stopped yet, so “seven down, we’ll see how many to go.”

Guy #1 – “Many experts in the drug trade have pointed out that these strikes have occurred more than 1,000 miles from the U.S. coast, and the targeted boats are designed for speed, not range — at least not without carrying considerable amounts of gas for refueling.  An efficient, single outboard would consume 680 gallons of gas between the April 17 strike location and the U.S.  A twin-engine at top speed would consume 2,700 gallons.  There’s not enough room on the boats for that much extra gas. So, although some of these boats were probably involved in drug smuggling, their destination was not likely to be U.S. waters or the U.S. coast.

Guy #2 – So, assuming you’re right, and I’m not – we saved other people’s lives, instead of our own.  Very compassionate of us.

Guy #1 -- The fentanyl that ends up in the United States doesn’t really come from Venezuela; it’s mostly from China and Mexico. 

GUY #2 – So what, they are still carrying deadly, illegal drugs and deserve to die. 

If you want to have some fun, resend this and ask your friends to guess whose side you're on?

I’ll attach a rough map showing an approximate location of the first four strikes.

Ralph Bristol is the former long-time morning talk radio host broadcasting on Supertalk 99.7 WTN. He was one of the less provocative and bombastic of conservative radio personalities, more thoughtful and grounded in conservative ideas. He left talk radio in 2018 and retired. He lives in Nashville. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Santa's Pub listed as One of the Most Iconic Dive Bars in America


by Rod Williams, Oct. 21, 2025- A Fox News Report article, The most iconic dive bars in America: Are any in your state?, lists Santa's Pub as one of them. 

I know Santa's Pub. I make a point to walk most days and a trip from my house to Santa's Pub is only 2.8 miles round-trip, a perfect length for my walks. I end up going to Santa's about once a month or so. It is usually a Karaoke bar,  but on Sundays, Santa's has a great band called The Ice Cold Pickers. 

The band is a real country band that plays the old stuff and new stuff that sounds like the old stuff. A lot of bands you hear on Broadway are talented, but often play cover tunes and try to sound just like the original. The Ice Cold Pickers play familiar songs too, but they don't sound like they are mimicking the originals. The band makes old songs sound fresh and new. They may also play songs that were deep album cuts of artists you know, but songs that never got much airplay, or they may reinterpret a familiar rock song and make it sound like a country standard. 

The band does not always sound the same. Some of the members are always the same; there is a drummer, steel guitar, fiddle and lead guitar, but some members switch out. One time the band may have a soulful keyboardist as part of the band, and the next time they may have a banjo player or an upright bass, or another guitarist. The band members have resumes of having toured with artists whose names you would recognize. For the first hour, it is just the band, then for the second hour, they bring up a guest vocalist. The guests are aspiring stars with their own style and usually people who have already had some success. Santa's Pub is a place where you see real artist honing their craft. 

Recently, the owner passed away. I was pleased to see the bar has reopened, but I wonder how long it will last. It sits on valuable land across from the fairgrounds. While Nashville is a tourist mecca and music city, much of the music is packaged for tourists and does not have the old feel of artists creating music; Stanta's does.

Here is what the article had to say:

This holiday-themed bar is located in a double-wide trailer that was part of an old construction site. The family-owned spot reopens on Oct. 19 following beloved owner Elmer Denzel Irwin's death in September. Even celebrities including Kacey Musgraves and Ed Sheeran mourned him on social media, The Tennessean reported. Customers praise Santa's on Yelp for its cheap drinks and lively karaoke.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, October 20, 2025

The "There is Only One King" Elvis Guy From the No Kings Rally

by Rod Williams, Oct. 20, 2025 - In my post of yesterday, What I Saw at the "Hate America' Rally Yesterday. I reported that one of the best costumes I saw was the man dressed like Elvis. I lost the picture I took of him, but today I found this on Facebook and am sharing. 

p

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Learn More About the Massive Change Proposed for Zoning in Nashville. Here is the Schedlule of Public Meetings.

by Rod Williams, Oct. 20, 2025- Big changes are being proposed for the way we do planning and zoning in Nashville. I, like many of you I am sure, have shifted my focus away from local politics in the face of the daily assault on our liberties from the Trump administration. I get it. When unidentified masked gunmen in military garb are snatching people off the streets of American cities and sending them to foreign prisons and when the President is threatening to declare America in a state of insurrection and impose martial law, who has time to care about boring stuff like zoning classifications? We only have so much bandwidth and Trump's threat to liberty is taking it all. Despite that, what happens locally still matters and matters a lot.

Before the people of Nashville is a decision about the future of what Nashville will look like. Will we make housing more affordable? Will we build more housing units? Will we protect the character of our communities? Will we curb urban sprawl? We can't do all of these things and have to choose. 

I know discussions about the difference between an "R" zoning and an "RS" zoning can make one's eyes glaze over but if you wake up one day and the single-family home next door to you has been replaced by an eight-unit apartment, don't say they slipped it in on you. 

I am not fully informed of what is specifically being proposed. I have attended some meetings and have a general knowledge. Essentially, there is a proposal to increase density in Nashville. While I oppose efforts to do it one district at a time, I think a general redoing of Nashville's planning and zoning is overdue. I have observed for decades as little by little, neighborhood at a time, vast swaths of the city that were zoned "R," which allowed duplexes, were rezoned "RS" which allowed single-family only. Back when my blog focused almost exclusively on local politics, I reported on these changes and editorialized against them and said that these downzonings would lead to increased housing costs and a housing shortage and urban sprawl. I think it has.

I tend to favor increased density. However, I am not sure we really need 90,000 units of new housing in Nashville by 2034.  I do, however, think it is too hard to build housing in Nashville, and our zoning makes housing more scarce and less affordable.  The argument against a more liberal zoning regimen is that it changes the character of one's neighborhood. I get that. Also, however, not allowing greater density changes the character of someone else's neighborhood as Nashville's urban sprawl changes the character of rural communities in middle Tennessee. So, I favor less restrictive zoning, allowing for greater density, yet the details matter a lot.

In 2024, Nashville’s Metropolitan Council passed a resolution that directed several city agencies, including the Metropolitan Planning Department, to study the possible changes Nashville can make to allow for more housing as our city continues to experience growth. That study called the Housing and Infrastructure Study has now been released. The proposals in the study will lead to Council bills which will, if passed, will lead to substantial change in the way we do planning and zoning in Nashville and what can be built and where. 

There are going to be several community meetings around town soon to learn more about what is in the study. Here is the schedule:

District 24, 25, & 34 Joint Community Meeting 
Oct 22, 2025 | 6:00 - 7:30 p.m.
Hillsboro High School auditorium  
3812 Hillsboro Pike 
Nashville, TN 37215 

District 22, 23, 34, & 35 Joint Community Meeting 
Oct 27, 2025 | 6:00 - 7:30 p.m.  
James Lawson High School auditorium 
8001 Highway 70 S 
Nashville, TN 37221 

Southeast Regional Community Meeting 
Oct 28, 2025 | 6:00 - 8:30 p.m.  
Southeast Community Center  
5260 Hickory Hollow Pkwy, Ste 202 
Nashville, TN 37013 

District 4, 26, & 27 Joint Community Meeting 
Oct 29, 2025 | 6:00 - 7:30 p.m. 
Crievewood Baptist Church
480 Hogan Rd 
Nashville, TN 37220 

District 11, 12, 13, 14, & 15 Joint Community Meeting 
Oct 30, 2025 | 6:00 - 7:30 p.m.  
Mt. Gilead Missionary Baptist Church 
4004 Lebanon Pike 
Hermitage, TN 37076 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Lamar Alexander: Donald Trump Isn’t a University President

Lamar Alexander
by Rod Williams, Oct. 20, 2025- Former Tennessee Governor, former U.S. Senator, and former Secretary of Education and current Vanderbilt Trustee Lamar Alexander has criticized Donald Trump's proposed "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education" as an overreach of federal power. In an op-ed published in The Wall Street Journal on October 16, 2025, Alexander argued against the federal government trying to manage the nation's colleges and universities. 

I have always had the utmost respect for Senator Alexander. I wish there were still Republicans like Lamar. Below are excerpts from the article:

Donald Trump Isn’t a University President

by Lamar Alexander, The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 16, 2025 - It happens in every presidential administration. New officials come up with some big idea and say, “Now, let’s make everyone do it.”

The latest example of this federal overreach is the Trump administration’s proposed “Compact for Excellence in Higher Education,” which would create a national board of trustees for America’s roughly 6,000 colleges and universities. It would impose strict guidelines on student admissions, grading, testing and the hiring of faculty, as well as set tuition, define free speech, and limit the number of international students. In exchange, institutions would receive “multiple positive benefits” and “substantial and meaningful federal grants.” And a lot of mandatory paperwork for Washington’s education police.

We have seen this pattern before, and we shouldn’t fall for it now. ... Democrats have long enjoyed meddling in schools. .. I have always believed that the Republican Party exists to stop such Washington meddling. ...

Mr. Trump’s proposed higher education compact may provoke some useful dialogue around reform. But the federal government shouldn’t try to manage the nation’s 6,000 colleges and universities. Most of the world’s best are here in the U.S. They have helped win wars, created lifesaving cures, and spawned innovations that have given America 26% of the world’s gross domestic product despite having only 4% of its population. The world’s brightest students compete to study at our universities and 17 national laboratories, to build innovative enterprises and win Nobel prizes as U.S. citizens.

Republicans should remember what it means to be Reagan’s heirs and stop acting like Democrats ... (read it all)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Trump's Memphis Safe Task Force is Getting Duct-taped Windows and Dangling Bumpers off the Streets of Memphis

Officers from Tennessee Highway Patrol, Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Marshals Service and the FBI responded to a. traffic stop on Lamar Ave. in Memphis, Tennessee on Oct. 7, 2025. They detained the driver for at least 45 minutes while they searched his car, then let him go with a citation for a loose front bumper. (Photograph by John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)

by Cassandra Stephenson, Tennessee Lookout, October 20, 2025 - A Tennessee Highway Patrol officer rested his hat on the roof of a white sedan — its front plastic bumper slightly sagging, doors and trunk open — as he searched between the front seats with a flashlight.

The car’s driver, a middle-aged Black man with dreadlocks pulled back into a ponytail, stood between another Highway Patrol officer and a man in an FBI vest near the hood of a THP vehicle and an unmarked pickup truck. The driver crossed his arms and stared at his feet, outfitted in white socks and slides. Two more officers wearing Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) vests walked between the sedan and the flashing blue lights of the THP car.

It was just after dusk on a Tuesday at a Sunoco gas station on Lamar Avenue, a main roadway that runs through several of Memphis’s most poverty-stricken neighborhoods, where the overwhelming majority of residents are minorities, according to the U.S. Census.

Two additional unmarked vehicles pulled into the small gas station and three more officers emerged: one U.S. marshal and two others wearing vests labeled only, “POLICE,” bringing the total to eight law enforcement officers and four vehicles.

At least 45 minutes into what one HSI officer at the scene described to Tennessee Lookout as a “simple traffic stop,” a Highway Patrol officer handed the driver a pink ticket.

The violation: The dangling front bumper.

The driver silently walked around his car, closing the trunk and each of the doors as the eight law enforcement officers slowly withdrew. “Nice talking with you, man,” one officer called over his shoulder as he walked away.

A few minutes later, the driver, who declined to give his name, emerged from his car with a cellphone in his hand.

“That’s the craziest s–t ever,” he said as he lifted the hood and popped the plastic bumper back into place.

A Tennessee Highway Patrol officer and two Homeland Security Investigations officers search a vehicle during a traffic stop on Lamar Ave. in Memphis, Tennessee on Oct. 7, 2025.(Photograph by John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)

Nearly three weeks after the Memphis Safe Task Force was launched at the direction of President Donald Trump with the support of Gov. Bill Lee, officers from multiple federal and state agencies have issued more than 4,600 traffic citations — far outpacing the task force’s 1,044 arrests and 206 firearm seizures reported by the U.S. Marshals Service as of Friday morning.

Local advocacy groups have logged hundreds of reports from community members of multi-agency traffic stops, some posting videos of the interactions to social media.

Trump established the task force through a presidential memo on Sept. 15 to “end street and violent crime in Memphis to the greatest possible extent.” His memo specifically calls for “strict enforcement” of laws “prohibiting assault, battery, larceny, graffiti and other vandalism, unpermitted disturbances and demonstrations, noise, trespassing, public intoxication, drug possession, sale, vagrancy and use, and traffic violations.”

But federal and state agencies have thus far refused to release details of the citations and arrests — charges, names and circumstances — to the Tennessee Lookout beyond broad categorizations. A Department of Justice  spokesperson cited “operational security” as the reason for the limited information but declined to elaborate on the record. 

The Tennessee Highway Patrol did not respond to requests for the overall number of traffic stops performed, including those that did not result in citations or arrests. It is also unclear how many of the task force’s arrests resulted from traffic stops.

Lack of data leaves unknowns about impact on ‘violent crime’

Trump, Lee, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and other public officials have celebrated the arrest numbers, crediting the task force with taking hundreds of “career criminals” and “known gang members” off of Memphis streets. But the limited data released by the task force so far does not provide enough information to support these statements, and community advocacy groups contend that the majority of the people being arrested or cited are not violent criminals.

The U.S. Marshals Service’s broad breakdown of the 1,044 arrests includes eight homicides, 48 sex offenses, 110 firearm arrests and 116 arrests involving narcotics charges. Two arrests were due to probation or parole violations, 418 were for “warrants” with no additional explanation provided, 155 were for “other” reasons, and 187 were for Administrative ICE Warrants, which are signed by U.S. Immigration and Customs officials and do not carry the same investigative powers as criminal warrants signed by a judge. 

Among those arrested were 92 “known gang members,” according to the U.S. Marshals Service, though the data released does not include any further information about these individuals’ alleged gang ties. U.S. marshals also reported 56 missing children have been located by the task force, but did not include the circumstances of those cases.

A report to local officials of the task force’s actions on Oct. 13 showed that 37 out of the 51 people arrested that day were not charged with violent offenses, according to reporting from MLK50: Justice Through Journalism. This includes seven arrests for people “unlawfully present in the United States” — a civil offense — with no other criminal charges listed. The document also listed 59 misdemeanor citations.

Shelby County District Attorney Steve Mulroy reported that his staff had 52% more felony cases and 30% more misdemeanor cases to handle after the task force’s first week, compared with his office’s normal volume. Felony charges can include both violent and nonviolent crimes. Mulroy’s office could not be reached for updated information.

‘Needle in a haystack approach’

Minutes after the stop at the Sunoco station, Tennessee Lookout observed another Highway Patrol vehicle and unmarked pickup truck pulling into a different gas station on Lamar Avenue behind a vehicle with a duct-taped rear window, damaged door and missing front grill.

THP, ATF and FBI officers surrounded the car with a handicap placard hanging from the rearview mirror driven by an elderly Black woman and man. The officers left roughly 15 minutes later. The woman driving the car, who declined to share her name, said the officers told her they pulled her over because the registration tags were not up to date and let her go when they discovered that wasn’t true.

Scarlet Neath, a senior adviser for The Policing Project at the New York University School of Law, said stops like this are examples of “pretextual stops,” or “low-level traffic stops that are made for equipment, administrative (or) other minor violations — like objects hanging from a rearview mirror, a single broken tail light or missing registration sticker — that really have no connection to road safety and which are frequently used as an excuse to look for evidence of an unrelated crime.” 

“Police use them as a pretense for fishing for evidence of activity like possessing drugs,” Neath told Tennessee Lookout.

Memphis barred the use of such stops in 2023, a few months after 29-year-old Tyre Nichols died after police beat him during a traffic stop. But state legislators passed a law in 2024 that blocked local governments from instituting such rules, nullifying the Memphis ordinance.

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers materials describe pretextual stops for traffic violations as the easiest way to investigate a driver or vehicle for a suspected crime when an officer might not have enough facts for “reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.”

Regardless of an officer’s intent for the stop, the training materials state that pretextual stops don’t violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure, so long as they are not “based solely on race or religion.” Pretextual stops must also be “reasonable,” and no longer than necessary to investigate “reasonable suspicion.”

Studies of such stops have called their effectiveness and fairness into question.

A study of the Metro Nashville Police Department’s traffic stop practices conducted by Stanford Computational Policy Lab and the Policing Project in 2018 found that “Black drivers were stopped substantially more than white drivers” and “these disparities were particularly pronounced among stops for non-moving violations, such as broken tail lights and expired registration tags.”

The study also found that these stops “had no discernible effect on serious crime rates, and only infrequently resulted in the recovery of contraband or a custodial arrest.”

“Evidence to date on using random low-level traffic stops to interrupt or detect serious and violent crime shows that it’s a needle in a haystack approach,” Neath said.

Another study examining California traffic stop data from 2019 estimated that the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department made 58,292 stops that year, but “only 487 (less than 1%) were for suspicion of a crime that could be classified as a felony.” Deputies in Riverside County spent about nine out of every 10 hours on the clock on traffic stops initiated by deputies, adding up to an estimated annual cost of more than $258 million.

The cost of running the Memphis Safe Task Force and the amount of time it spends on stops that don’t result in arrests or citations are unclear.

Neath said more data would be needed to examine whether the task force’s traffic stops are effective, including why a stop was made, its outcome (arrest, deportation, seizure, charges brought, etc.), and whether the person who was arrested or faced an immigration consequence had a history of criminal charges.

“All charges are not created equal in terms of public safety, just like all traffic stops are not equally important to road safety,” she said.

Shelby Co. mayor, advocates say traffic stops generate fear

Shelby County Mayor Lee Harris expressed concern about potential racial profiling in the task force’s traffic stops during a Tuesday news conference alongside immigration lawyer Colton Bane and community organizer Carlos Ochoa. 

Harris said task force members pulled over one of the county’s employees — a Latino man — and “detained him for a small while, while they investigated his paperwork,” before letting him go without an explanation of why they stopped him.

Bane said he has received “numerous” reports from clients and non-clients of task force officers refusing to return driver’s licenses to Hispanic people after traffic stops. In one instance, a client called Bane during a traffic stop in which Department of Homeland Security and Highway Patrol officers returned the man’s work permit and Social Security card but refused to return his state-issued ID. When Bane arrived and introduced himself as the man’s attorney, a Department of Homeland Security officer retrieved the ID from his pocket, returned it to Bane’s client, and released him.

Bane said the traffic stop was initiated because of his client’s “drive-out” tags — the temporary paper tags that come with vehicles purchased from car dealerships. The client’s temporary tags are valid until Nov. 30, Bane said.

A DOJ spokesperson referred Tennessee Lookout to local law enforcement when asked whether task force members have seized state-issued identification during traffic stops. Tennessee Highway Patrol did not respond to Tennessee Lookout’s questions.

Ochoa, a member of Vecindarios 901, said members of immigrant communities are afraid to leave their homes, seek medical care, take their children to school or visit local parks.

“The most important thing here is to balance safety and liberty,” Ochoa said. “Everyone is interested in reducing crime. Nobody here is interested in reducing liberty … As a community, we need to balance those two things.”

When asked about community response to the task force, a spokesperson for the United States Marshals Service told Tennessee Lookout, “Though some in Memphis are not supportive of the effort, we have found the overall attitude of the residents, as well as local and state leaders, is positive and they are glad to see the efforts being made are reducing crime and putting the dangerous people behind bars and off the streets.” 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, October 19, 2025

What I Saw at the "Hate America' Rally Yesterday


by Rod Williams Oct 19, 2025-
I attended the No Kings protest yesterday, and it was like a giant festival. There was a street party vibe to the gathering. I don't know how many people attended. My guess is about 5,000, but who knows? The event took place on the big hill down from the Capitol building, but spilled over to the park on the north side of Rosa Parks Boulevard and in both directions down the avenue. I got to a good vantage point at the top of the hill and tried to make a calculated estimate of the crowd size, but my view would not take in all of the crowd, and people were still arriving about an hour into the event. Traffic was snarled and people had to walk from many blocks away. The crowd could have been 10,000.

Donald Trump and sycophants like Mike Johnson had tried to besmirch these No Kings rallies as a gathering of ANTIFA, and Humas supporters, and illegal aliens, and other radicals and misfits. They also warned that they might turn violent. I guess the purpose of this was to damp down attendance and to create a narrative for those who live in the right-wing media bubble of Fox News, conservative talk radio, and right-wing podcasts..  

A "hate America rally" is not what I saw. I walked through the crowd, purposely observing. I did not see a single Mexican flag, nor a single Palestinian flag, nor an ANTIFA flag. If there were any ANTIFA there, they were out of uniform. I saw one hand-printed sign with the message "Free Palestine." I saw a sign saying America was a racist nation. I saw some stupid signs such as one saying something like, "no illegals on stolen land. abolish borders." I saw no indications that this was a crowd that hated America and actually, only a few signs or t-shirts that advocated liberal positions.  By liberal, I mean policy positions typically controversial and are Democratic Party positions. I saw a few signs with a pro-choice advocacy and a few with a message condemning wealth inequality and a pro-trans sign. I saw lots of "small L" liberal signs and t-shirts, such as opposition to censorship, signs advocating the rule of law, and signs and shirts denouncing Trump's authoritarianism.

I saw lots of American flags, from tiny flags to big flags. This was not a crowd ashamed to show their patriotism. I even saw some people displaying the Gadsden "Don't Tread on Me" flag. I was heartened to see that. The Gadsden flag has become identified as a flag for right-wingers. It's message is more fitting to the resistance to Trump's authoritarianism. I still have a Gadsden Flag T-shirt from the tea party days. I may pull it back out and wear it to the next resistance rally. 

I saw veterans with signs proclaiming their oath to the Constitution. I saw families with babies in baby strollers and people who brought their dogs. I saw people in funny blow-up costumes and lots of humorous signs. One of the funniest images was a guy dressed like Elvis, with a mic, the sideburns and all, with a message saying there is only one king. I took pictures, but either my camera phone malfunctioned or I accidentally erased the pics, so I don't have the picture to show you.

While I did not expect violence in Nashville, I thought it was a possibility. I thought some Proud Boy types might show up and counter-protest, and some ANTIFA types might engage them. Or maybe otherwise peaceful people may have begun pelting them with water bottles or whatever. Otherwise good people can sometimes get ugly in large crowds.  Luckily, there were no counterprotestors. I did not even see any pro-Trump motorist driving along Rosa Parks Boulevard. 

I had a good conversation with a young lady carrying a sign with the message, "Constitutional Conservative Against Trump." I knew she was my kind of person and I engaged her in conversation. I am a poor judge of age, but she could have been in her 30's but looked to be in her early 20's. She was a movement conservative type who knew the conservative pundits and personalities and had, from what I gathered, been a conservative activist prior to Trump. She, like me, opposed Trump because he had betrayed conservative principles. We shared our dismay about how conservatives had betrayed everything they once professed to believe, like free trade, limited government, separation of powers, and states' rights. We may have only talked a few minutes but shared a lot. I think it encouraged each of us to know we were not the only conservatives remaining true to our values. 

There was a stage with a sound system, but it was very inadequate to cover the crowd. In addition to a poor sound system, I have some hearing loss that cannot be corrected by the hearing aids I wear, so I did not hear but snippets of what the speakers had to say. I don't think it matters. I actually think the rally would have been just as good without speakers and I don't think many people were listening to the speakers. I did hear one Black chick sing a powerful soulful blues number. I was told Emmy Lou Harris sang a song, but I couldn't swear to it. I did not hear her. 

There were no chants originating from the stage. There were some applause lines, but I did not hear them. There were some call and responses from segments of the crowd but not from the main stage. There was one chant that goes, "What does democracy look like?" "This is what democracy looks like."  And there was another that goes, "No Peace!" "No Justice."

I really can't get into the call-responce thing. I think it is a lefty thing, and I just can't relate. Also, however, I think I am just not wired for group hysteria. I don't like live sporting events. I am not much of a sports fan but have been to football games, and hockey, and stock car racing. I never could get into jumping to my feet and screaming for my team. I love live music. However, I like it in intimate settings. I can enjoy a show at the Ryman if I have good seats, but I have no desire to see the biggest star there is play a football arena. I would rather watch a sporting event or a concert on TV than be in a big crowd. Even during the tee party days when I attended rallies or the couple of times I went to CPAC, I would applaud at the end of a speech, but I am very slow to work into a frenzy. So maybe I dislike the call/response thing not because I perceive it to be a lefty thing, but maybe I am just resistant to mass psychosis and herd mentality. Anyway, I could have done without the call and response but that's just me.

I did observe that the crowd tended to be older than I would have expected. We have come to expect, I think, that young people are more likely to partake in protest than older people. While there were people of all ages at the protest, there were probably more people in their fifties and sixties than in their teens and twenties. I am an old man, in my seventies, but there were quite a few of us real oldies at the event. While I am pleased that we old people turned out, I am disappointed that there was not a greater number of young people. Also, I think Black people were underrepresented. I have no data to support any of this but it is my impression.

I think these protests are important. I don't think any one protest will change the course of history, but as Trump's authoritarianism grows, there may come a time when we need a general strike to shut down the country. These protests can prepare us for that day. Mass peaceful protests can bring down governments and change history. The Berlin Wall was not toppled by tanks but by a mass of ordinary people. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories