When it comes to the large controversial data center proposed for property near the zoo, I adamantly oppose the government using eminent domain to take the property. I favor property rights and think eminent domain should only be used for things like widening a roadway or building a school, but only when an exhaustive effort to find a willing seller fails. Mayor O’Connell filed eminent domain legislation to acquire the zoo site for public use, including a health center and fire station. This was purely designed to stop the data center. This is a targeted taking attempt, not a legitimate use of eminent domain. The Metro Council has also passed a moratorium on data centers to stop the one near the zoo.
The company building the data center is not gracefully withdrawing from the fight; they are fighting back. They assert that they are already vested in the property and they have received their permits and are in compliance with existing zoning requirements and other requirements in place at the time, and have already spent money to build it. If this goes to court, I suspect Metro will pay DC Blox millions to compensate them for their loss. To stop this approved development will cost Nashville taxpayers a pretty penny.
A petition against the zoo site data center surpassed 360,000 signatures. I am sure that when someone approaches the average person and says, "There is a proposal to build a data center near the zoo, and it will cause anxiety for the elephants. Will you sign our petition to stop it," that many will sign without thinking. I have been a part of petition drives, and people will sign anything. Simply getting a large number of people to sign a petition should not carry the day. Even if a majority oppose it, that does not mean it should be stopped. We, including companies and other entities, have rights, not subject to the opinion of a large number of people or a majority of the people. DC Blox had a right to build the data center, and then that right was taken away.
Fights like the one is Nashville are taking place all over the country. I think that people fear AI and the AI future, as perhaps they should, and opposing data centers is a way to express that fear. I think the opposition to data centers is more of a concern about AI than the actual facility of a data center. Data centers will be built, if not in the US, then in China. Stopping a data center in Nashville is not going to slow AI. However, if data centers are not built in the US, it disadvantages the US and helps China.
President Trump has weighed in on data centers, and for once I tend to think the President is right. I wish he would be more diplomatic in the way he says things, but that is not the Trump way.
President Trump has lashed out at communities that are protesting data centers, suggesting that residents who oppose them must prefer to be “backwards and poor.” “The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor. If they want to be successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign.”
Representative Tim Burchett of Knoxville has been a Trump cheerleader and also, from time to time, says some cringe-worthy, embarrassing things. He also promotes various conspiracy theories. I do not have a favorable opinion of Tim Burchett. Nevertheless, I am pleased to see Tim Burchett push back against Donald Trump on the data center issue, despite thinking Donald Trump is more right than Burchett, even if I think Donald Trump expresses things crudely. I guess I just like to see two people I don't like disagree.
Top Stories