Top Stories
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Who is Van Jones
Isn't it interested how liberals consider it "smear tactics" when you use one of their own's own words to expose them? Arianna Huffington calls the exposé of Jones a "vile and vicious smear campaign." Keith Olberman calls Jones' critics racist. Other liberals are equally defensive of Jones and critical of his critics.
Jones has spoken openly of his becoming a communist. In speaking of the period in his life in which he moved further leftward he has stated, "By August, I was a communist." He does not view that as a mistake or something he views with regret or shame but simply states it factually. He is an unrepentant communist. He has said that he has since changed his tactics from his days as a rowdy Black nationalist radical, but not his views. He says he still considers himself a revolutionary.
Those that defend Jones do not deny that Van Jones is a communist and an anarchist and a 9-11 truther, they just think it is smear tactic to mention it. Despite history's record of the Communism experiment; despite the undeniable fact that Mao and Stalin are each responsible for many more deaths than Hitler, many American liberals still have a soft spot in their heart for communism and prefer communist to anti-communist. In their view it is cool to be a communist. The way they see it, Communist are just really committed progressives. They view being a communist as a noble thing and a mark of one's commitment to some sort of social justice. I can only assume that President Obama shares that view.
God help us.
Top Stories
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
Van Jones should be Front Page news!
Most Major News Outlets Largely Ignore Van Jones Controversy
FOX News.com, Monday, September 07, 2009
Most of the major news outlets, like The New York Times and The Washington Post, ignored the swelling heat surrounding former White House environmental adviser Van Jones and the videos surfacing of his controversial statements. (link)
Comment
If not for Glen Beck and bloggers, Van Jones would still be serving in the administration. It is unbelievable that most of the news media did not find this story more newsworthy. The Tennessean placed the article on the very back page of the front section of the paper. This story got downplayed by all of the major media except for Fox. I can not understand why the "mainstream" press thinks that it is not newsworthy when an self-avowed Marxist and anarchist is appointed to an important administrative position and then is forced to resign.
Not only is Jones a Marxist and anarchist, but he is "9-11 truther." a defender of a Black convicted cop killer and he recently refereed to Republicans as "assholes." I can only imagine how the press would have responded if, for example, George W. Bush or any President had appointed a self avowed admirer of Hitler who denied the Holocaust. Would the story of his appointment and subsequent resignation be buried on the back page of the paper? No! It would be covered in screaming bold headlines.
I also find it amassing that Jones passed the administrations vetting process. I can only assume that being a professed Marxist does not bother the President and is not seen as a factor that would disqualify one from serving in the administration. Given Obama's affiliation with American Communist terrorist William Ayers, and radical Black Nationalist Reverend Jeremiah Wright, I guess we should not be surprised by a Van Jones.
Mr. Jones was one of the many "czars" appointed by Obama, that unlike cabinet appointees do not have to undergo Congressional confirmation. I hope Beck or someone with the resources to do so, looks at all of the appointments of the Obama administration and finds out who else Obama has appointed.
Top Stories








.jpg)



