Showing posts with label John Stossell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Stossell. Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2013

Technology may break the anti-free market, crony capitalism Nashville model of transportation

If you watched John Stossell last night, you again saw the embarrassing story of how Nashville outlawed affordable Black Sedan transportation services by making them charge the same fees and operate like the luxury limousine companies. The Nashville story was part of a program showcasing how government regulations stifle innovation and protect existing companies from competition. (To learn more about Nashville's limo price-fixing follow this link)

Another segments showcased how in Kentucky, new moving companies are prohibited from entering the market unless they can get a certificate of necessity. This  allows existing movers to block new competition. To illustrate the absurdity of this, Stossell compared it to what would have happened if Starbucks would had had to obtain a certificate of necessity before opening new coffee shops. There were plenty of places to buy coffee before Starbucks. If we would have had the same environment in coffee shops as in transportation or moving companies, there would be no Starbucks.


Lyft is looking for drivers in Nashville! Join the community
and make up to $20/hr and over $500 per weekend while
meeting great people around the city. Choose when you drive!
Another segment featured the innovative ride sharing program called Lyft. People who want to give rides are matched up with people who need rides by way of an app and on-line application. The ride provider and the person needing a ride, check each other out on-line. Lyft makes sure the providers meet liability insurance requirements and have safe driving records and beyond that, there is not a lot of bureaucracy. No one has to accept a particular fare and no one has to take a particular service provider. No money directly changes hands and Lyft handles the receipts and payments. As is to be expected, cab companies are fighting and trying to ban Lyft. (To see a video learn and more about Lyft, follow this link,)

There has long been other models for putting people who need a ride in touch with people wanting to offer a ride. There has long been para transit in third world countries. When I was a young man living in Thailand, there were buses and taxies, but there were  also pedicabs and other forms of transportation. There was a  hybrid between a taxi and a bus.  It was priced between bus fare and taxi fare and traveled a relatively fixed route but would deviate off of the regular route to take people to their door. That was legal in Thailand but was illegal and is still illegal in America.

While vacationing in Turkey some years ago, Louella and I stayed at a beautiful seaside fishing village-resort called Assos. We arrived at night by taxi. When we got ready to leave we wanted a cheaper means of transportation and were told where to catch a minibus. We got on the bus and waited and waited. Finally I inquired when we would be leaving and with the language barrier  I finally learned that their were options. We could leave now for one fare, or wait until more people arrived and pay a cheaper fare. If it was full, it was a really cheap fare. I don't know what would have happened if some  had wanted to wait until it was full and some wanted to go immediately, but their system somehow seemed to work.

America prides itself on being a free market capitalistic country, but in many ways we are a lot less free than the rest of the world. When it comes to transportation, we want everything to fit in a neat box. Transportation providers must be buses, taxis, or limousines. Innovation and competition is not permitted. This is more so in Nashville than other cities.  Nashville is one of only seven cities in America with a minimum fare for limousines, which in Nashville, includes Black Sedans.

Finally, technology may break the anti-free market, crony capitalism Nashville model of transportation. We have enough cars on the road. Not everyone has to have their own vehicle. We already have bike share programs and zipcars. With people becoming aware of services like Lyft and Uber and Sidecar, people may demand  that government get out of the way and let the market work. I hope so. One thing that would help would be if we elected people to the Metro Council who believe in capitalism.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Please watch tonight. Nashville is famous again!


Red tape is strangling the little guy. Our special, War on the Little Guy, airs Saturday at 9pm on Fox News https://www.facebook.com/JohnStossel

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

John Stossel on Nashville's limo price-fixing

Nashville's limo price-fixing scheme keeps being used by free market advocates as one of the best examples of intrusive government, anti-competitive practices, and crony capitalism. This is from an opinion piece by John Stossel:

In Nashville, Tenn., regulators ruled it illegal for a limo to charge less than $45 a ride. One entrepreneur had won customers by charging half that, but the new regulations mean the established car service businesses no longer have to worry about him.
Perhaps Nashville's and Vegas' regulators really believe "this is an area where the free market doesn't work," as the manager of the Nevada Transportation Services Authority put it. But it's fishy that charging big fees for licenses just happens to be a very effective shakedown operation. Vegas cab and limousine businesses give "substantial" donations to Vegas-area political candidates, according to the Las Vegas Sun. (read more

Do you think our Council is proud of being the best bad example? Some are, I am sure. The council should go on record and vote to repeal limo price fixing. Win or lose, it would be nice to know who the supporters of free markets are and who are the supporters of price-fixing and crony capitalism.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, August 22, 2008

The Idiocy of Energy Independence

John Stossel Wednesday, August 20, 2008

It's amazing how ideas with no merit become popular merely because they sound good.

Most every politician and pundit says "energy independence" is a great idea. Presidents have promised it for 35 years. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we were self-sufficient, protected from high prices, supply disruptions and political machinations?

The hitch is that even if the United States were energy independent, it would be protected from none of those things. To think otherwise is to misunderstand basic economics and the global marketplace. (link)

Comment: While reducing dependence on foreign oil is an admirable goal, energy independence is neither desirable nor achievable. Stossel explains why.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories