Saturday, May 31, 2025

Trump Turns on the Federalist Society. He Didn't Want Originalist he Wanted Loyalist.

by Rod Williams, May 31, 2025- One of the things that compelled me to vote for Trump in 2020 was his record of appointing originalist jurist to the Courts. He appointed Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, all of whom were recommendations of the Federalist Society. I was thrilled by those appointments. In addition to the Supreme Court appointees, Trump was able to fill a lot of lower court vacancies, mostly also made up of Federalist Society nominees.

I have been pleased with the rulings of the Supreme Court on overturning Roe v Wade and other ruling. I have been especially pleased to see the lower courts stand up to Trump on issues like due process and the rule of law.

Trump is not pleased with the courts. President Trump has been lambasting judges, including many he appointed, as "activist judges." He has also lambasted the Federalist Society for the recommendations they made. When the various cases working their way through the courts reach the Supreme Court, I fully expect the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution and vote against Trump on several issues. I don't doubt the Supreme Court will uphold the Constitution.


Recently, Trump took to social media to lambast the courts. His post tells a lot about the way he thinks. Recently Trump got an adverse ruling from the U. S. Court of International Trade. Instead of seeing it as a loss for his administration, he sees the court as ruling against the United States of America. He says they are doing damage to the country. This is the way a king thinks, when they refer to "the crown," and see themselves as the embodiment of the nation. Trump thinks of himself that way.

Also, he cannot see that a ruling against his administration is a ruling based on interpreting the law and upholding the Constitution. A ruling against his position is because the justices simply hate him. "What other reason could there be?" he asks. It is all personal with Trump. 

His post also says a lot about his contempt for the legislative process, seeing it as, "hundreds of politicians setting around for weeks." The Constitutions says it is Congress's job to levy taxes, but that is too time consuming and cumbersome and is an impediment to Trump doing what he things he needs to do. To hell with what the Constitution says and to hell with Congress, they are impediments to getting the job done. That is the way kings and other dictators think. 

Also, from his recent Truth Social post he refers to "radical left judges." Now, these are judges many of whom were recommended by the Federalist Society and appointed by Republican presidents. Some were Trump appointees and some Bush and Reagan appointees. I am not sure Trump knows his left from his right. In Trump's view and Trump world, a leftist is anyone who does not kowtow to the dear leader.

Writing in The Dispatch, Nick Catoggio had this to say about Trump's attack on Leonard Leo.  

Leo spent many years as the Federalist Society’s sherpa on judicial nominees, advising Republican presidents on whom to appoint and helping to shepherd candidates through the confirmation process. With the exception of Mitch McConnell, no one has done more this century to build a federal bench of originalist judges. But Trump didn’t want originalists—he wanted flunkies—and so Leo’s influence, and the influence of the organization he serves, have gone up in smoke. ....

Conservatives got the judiciary they wanted in exchange for supporting a man who radiates contempt for the constitutional order. In doing so, they empowered a postliberal movement that despises judges who do their jobs conscientiously instead of dutifully midwifing a Trumpist autocracy. As the Republican Party proceeds further down the path to fascism that those conservatives enabled, eventually the federal judiciary will consist entirely of believers in the “living Constitution,” half authoritarian and half progressive. In the long run, as Reaganites age out and are replaced by younger Trumpists, conservative judges as we’ve known them will go mostly extinct.  

Catoggio says conservatives, in order to get a conservative judiciary made a deal with the devil and now the Devil has come to collect.  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, May 30, 2025

The Davidson County GOP Picnic is this Saturday. I Think I will Skip it.

July 2010 Davidson County GOP Picnic
by Rod Williams, May 27, 2025- The Davidson County Republican Party Picnic will be this Saturday, at Centennial Park for those who are interested. 

I think I will skip it.

I have always enjoyed attending the GOP summer picnic. I think I have attended every one of them since becoming active in the local Party sometime along about 2008. Not all years did the Party have one, and some were better than others. One year instead of a picnic, the party just had watermelon and ice cream. Some of the picnics were poorly attended and didn't amount to much but some years the picnics were lively and featured live music, big crowds, awards presentations, speeches by the governor or our US Senator, speeches by candidates,  lots of signs and booths by candidates or booth promoting causes, a dunking booth, games, and red, white, and blue bunting and they were really rousing fun affairs. As is to be expected, years in which there were elections were better than years in which there were not elections. For a little of the flavor of previous picnics follow this link and this one and this one. 

The picnics have always been an opportunity to connect with people with whom I have worked with on behalf of conservative causes, electing candidates, and the Party. I have attended rallies, protest, worked the polls, attended award dinners, fundraising cocktail parties, barbeques, fish fries, the convention and caucus, and worked the phone banks with other Republicans and the picnic was a time to socialize with them. Plus, a summer picnic is just fun. 

I hate to miss it, and I have sort of been planning on attending, but just decided, or mostly decided, I will not be attending. 

One reason, I think I will skip the picnic, is because I want to avoid confrontation and having been an outspoken critic of Trump, some people may seek a confrontation with me. I have been called a RINO, a NeoCon, a Libtard, a liberal, a progressive, a Democrat, and worst online. Actually, I have no fear of a physical confrontation and little concern about a verbal attack. Actually, most people are much more civil in person than they are online. Also, the worst of the Trumpinista are not part of the Party. Party activist are a better grade of people than the typical non-Party-affiliated Trumpinista. At least that is my impression. So, while a confrontation is possible, it probably wouldn't happen, but I would probably get the cold shoulder. 

Another reason, I most likely will not be attending is that I would be uncomfortable being in the company of people who gush praise for Trump and wear his image on their clothes and the MAGA hat. I would have that whore-in-church feeling.

Another reason, and maybe the most important reason, is that I no longer share the same values of today's typical Republican. Not sharing their values, I have less desire to socialize with them. I still believe in limited government. I believe in America's leadership role in the world, in peace through strength, and strong alliances with other nations. Instead of increasing the deficit and national debt, I think we should be balancing the budget and reducing the debt. I believe in the rule of law, separation of powers, federalism, and revere the Constitution. I believe in capitalism, free markets and free trade. I believe in ordered liberty, norms, law and order, reasoning with those with whom you disagree, accepting the outcome when you lose, and treating others with dignity and respect and avoiding cruelty and chaos. I don't think I have changed but the Party has and has left me behind.

I know a few other never-Trump Republicans and if they are going, I may go yet. If I go and it disgust me too much, I can always eat and leave. If you go, enjoy yourself. I am kind of praying for rain on Saturday. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

The Last of the in-person Housing & Infrastructure Workshops is Tomorrow, Sat. May 31.

by Rod Williams, May 30, 2025- Big changes are being proposed for Nashville's zoning ordinance which would result in greater housing density and more flexibility in where housing can be build. A couple years ago, some members of the Metro Council introduced several ordinances that would have increased housing density. There was an outpouring of public opposition, and those measures were put on hold. 

Since that time, the Metro Planning Commission has been studying the issue and has developed a plan for changing Metro's zoning to achieve the result of greater housing density. The Planning Commission has produced its report and has been hosting public meetings where the housing study is explained and where Planning Commission staff are available to answer questions. I have been intending to attend one of those workshops, but being somewhat a procrastinator, I have done so yet. Tomorrow is the last of the workshops and I plan on attending.  

The workshop is Saturday, May 31 from 10:00 – 11:30 a.m. at the Sonny West Conference Center on the Fulton Campus, 700 2nd Ave S, Nashville, TN 37210.

For those unable to attend but would like more information about the study, follow this link. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Homeland Security identifies Nashville as sanctuary city


by Rod Williams, May 30, 2025- The Department of Homeland Security has named Nashville a sanctuary City. This is new. Other cities that are considered sanctuary cities have designated themselves as such. While there are no legal criteria that makes a city a sanctuary city, in general a sanctuary city is one that limits local cooperation with immigration officials. The policies of a sanctuary city include prohibiting police or city employees from questioning people about their immigration status and refusing requests by national immigration authorities to detain people beyond their release date, if they were jailed for breaking local law. 

Tennessee state law prohibits a jurisdiction in Tennessee from being a sanctuary city and requires local law enforcement to cooperate with ICE officers and requests to hold non-citizen inmates for deportation. This law was passed in 2017. In February of this year, a law went into effect that creates criminal penalties for officials who adopt sanctuary policies and requires their removal from office upon conviction. The law makes it a Class E felony, resulting in a potential prison sentence of between one to six years, for "each official who, in their capacity as a member of the governing body of a local government, votes to adopt a sanctuary policy."  Of course, Nashville has not voted for any such policies and the law would apply to members of the Metro Council in the case of Nashville. 

Our Sheriff cooperates with ICE. The Sheriff has said his department does not engage in immigration enforcement but, of course, Nashville's Sheriff's office is not a law enforcement agency.  The Sheriff has said he follows the law and notifies ICE when an undocumented alien is booked and gives ICE 48 hours to respond. 

It is obvious that Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell has annoyed the Trump administration by letting his displeasure with the ICE raids in Nashville be known and by helping to create a private fund to help those families left behind when a family member is deported. Representative Andy Ogles has said Homeland Security and Judiciary Committees are launching an investigation into the mayor's ‘conduct’ during ICE operations. The investigation is also looking to see if any federal funds were being used for ‘criminal enterprise.’

This is going to get tricky. It looks like the mayor has done nothing illegal and has simply spoken out and expressed his outrage or grandstanded, depending on how you see it. Obviously, Nashville Metro Council has not passed any policies that would violate State law. We may be doing the minimum to cooperate with ICE or simply not obstructing ICE, and the mayor's rhetoric is anti-ICE, but we have not crossed any line that would make us a sanctuary city under State law. 

The problem is that the Trumpinista dominated legislature, and State government will want to show their fealty to Trump by agreeing that Nashville is a sanctuary city and punishing Nashville. How do they agree with the Trump regime that Nashville is a sanctuary city, when the federal government has no definition of what a sanctuary city is, and when Metro has not violated the State law that defines a Sanctuary city?  When law is simply whatever those in power say it is, and there is no hard definition of what is and what is not against the law, it makes it difficult to point to what law was violated. Surely, the law has to be more than the mood of Donald Trump or the opinion of the head of Homeland Security.  

For more on this issue see link, link. For my views on the Nashville ICE raid see, Reflections on the Recent ICE Raids in Nashville.


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Surprise, Surprise! Trump delays 50% EU tariffs

by Rod Williams, May 37, 2025- Who would have guessed it? President Trump on Friday of last week, in a Truth Social post, announced 50% tariffs on imports from EU nations starting June 1. He said the EU was had been slow to offer trade concessions during a 90-day window to reach a deal that satisfies the administration, and he was fed up. For some reason, the stock market hardly budged on the news. Could it be, that no one believes Trump's bark anymore? Could it be that everyone knows anything he says is subject to change and should be taken with a grain of salt? Not that he will not do terrible things and foolish things, but he is just as likely to not follow through as to follow through. 

 On Sunday Trump said that he would delay imposing the 50 percent tariffs on all imports from the European Union until July 9 to allow more time for trade negotiations.

I am not going to be surprised if July 9th rolls around and Trumps delays them again. June 1st was an impossible deadline. There are 27 nations in the EU and the EU cannot make an agreement on tariffs without consultation with the member states. June 1 and July 9 are both impossible timelines to meet. So, when July 9 rolls around, I expect one of three things to happen: one, Trumps says he is making progress and delays the tariffs again; two, the EU passes some insignificant resolution on trade, Trump declares victory and does not impose the tariffs; or three, Trump imposes the Tariffs, the stock market reacts negatively, and after one, two, or three days, Trump lifts the tariffs.  We'll see.

Here is what I wrote last week.

A Timeline of Trumps Tariffs and another Three-year-old's Temper Tantrum

by Rod Williams, May 24, 2025- Yesterday President Trump announced he was imposing tariffs of 50% on imports from the EU. It is almost ho-hum, here we go again. Tariffs have been on again-off again so often it is hard to keep up. I am not going to be surprised when he drops them back down. 

I don't doubt that Trump is sincerely ignorant of economics and lacks an understanding of tariffs and really believes high tariffs are a good thing, and he may be so ignorant that he really believes that when he imposes tariffs on the EU it is EU countries or exporters that pay the tariffs, but I also have a suspicion that there may be a little market manipulation going on.  He is by far the most corrupt person to ever serve as president, so I am not going to be surprised if there is not a little insider trading to time the on and off to benefit his friends and family and his blind trust. 

Trump supporters do not get whiplash trying to follow Trumps tariffs and tariffs threats. They do not see a changing of his mind about a tariff as a backing down. They do not say Trump blinked. They say he is right when he is announcing a tariff and say how brilliant he is when he takes off a tariff. To his supporters he is exercising the art of the deal and playing three-dimensional chess and the rest of us are just too dumb to recognize his brilliance.  

When I look at Trump's tariff policy, I do not see a brilliant strategist playing three-dimensional chess; I see a three-year-old throwing a temper tantrum. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, May 25, 2025

To Watch the Loss of Your Nation’s Honor is Embarrassing and Painful.

by Rod Williams, May 2, 2025 - President Trump is taking America to a place we may have never been before, or so it seems. Maybe Andrew Jackson was as bad, or worse, but we don't know yet because Trump's still has three more years and nine months do whatever it is he is going to do. It appears that we are heading toward a shredding of the Constitution and the norms that have preserved our democracy. It feels to me like we are going down the path of a previous Argentina, or today's Hungary or any other number of countries that traded prosperity and democracy for autocracy and authoritarianism. 

The hardcore MAGA are of course happy with the direction we are headed and celebrate the cruelty, chaos, indecency, and the strong man rule unrestrained by concepts like the co-equal branches of government and the rule of law.  To those of us who have not joined the Trump cult, we are alarmed as we daily watch our democracy slip away. 

Both liberals and traditional conservatives are appalled and alarmed by Trump's rise to power, the violation of norms and constitutional restraints. While both liberals and traditional conservatives are appalled at what is happening, I think the conservatives feel something the liberals do not. The traditional conservatives feel betrayed.

A lot of liberals, I think, view Trump as a culmination of something they have been opposing all of their lives. When you always viewed Republicans as evil, then Trump is just eviler. Recently, I shared a Facebook meme that said something to the effect, "I did not know I would be spending my advanced years fighting fascism." Admittedly, "fascism," is an ill-defined term and I am not sure it actually applies. "Fascism" has become a meaningless pejorative. Maybe I should not have shared the meme. Nevertheless, I think the concept of the meme reflects what many of us feel. What we are experiencing is much different than anything experienced before in our lifetime. If it is not fascism, it is something close to it. A close acquaintance of mine replied to my sharing of the meme by saying something like, "I have been fighting fascism my whole life." 

When you also thought Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, John McCain and Mit Romney were evil or "fascist," then Trump is just more of the same but more so. When you revered Ronald Reagan and worked to elect people like George Bush and John McCain and Mitt Romney, and worked to advance a set of conservative ideas, Donald Trump feels like a betrayal of everything you ever believe in.

Thankfully there are still some faithful conservatives, people like George Will and Bill Crystal and David Brooks and the people who work for some of the conservative journals and think tanks who are remaining true to their conservative principle. Unfortunately, there are far too few of them.  Many people who still think of themselves as conservative have either embraced Trumpism or are too timid to oppose it. 

David Brooks writing in the most recent issue of The Atlantic expresses what I feel more than anything I have read. Below is an excerpt.

David Brooks
Charles de Gaulle began his war memoirs with this sentence: “All my life I have had a certain idea about France.” Well, all my life I have had a certain idea about America. I have thought of America as a deeply flawed nation that is nonetheless a force for tremendous good in the world. From Abraham Lincoln to Franklin D. Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan and beyond, Americans fought for freedom and human dignity and against tyranny; we promoted democracy, funded the Marshall Plan, and saved millions of people across Africa from HIV and AIDS. When we caused harm—Vietnam, Iraq—it was because of our overconfidence and naivete, not evil intentions.

Until January 20, 2025, I didn’t realize how much of my very identity was built on this faith in my country’s goodness—on the idea that we Americans are partners in a grand and heroic enterprise, that our daily lives are ennobled by service to that cause. Since January 20, as I have watched America behave vilely—toward our friends in Canada and Mexico, toward our friends in Europe, toward the heroes in Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office—I’ve had trouble describing the anguish I’ve experienced. Grief? Shock? Like I’m living through some sort of hallucination? Maybe the best description for what I’m feeling is moral shame: To watch the loss of your nation’s honor is embarrassing and painful.

To read the full article, follow this link.  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, May 24, 2025

A Timeline of Trumps Tariffs and another Three-year-old's Temper Tantrum

 


by Rod Williams, May 24, 2025- Yesterday President Trump announced he was imposing tariffs of 50% on imports from the EU. It is almost ho-hum, here we go again. Tariffs have been on again-off again so often it is hard to keep up. I am not going to be surprised when he drops them back down. 

I don't doubt that Trump is sincerely ignorant of economics and lacks an understanding of tariffs and really believes high tariffs are a good thing, and he may be so ignorant that he really believes that when he imposes tariffs on the EU it is EU countries or exporters that pay the tariffs, but I also have a suspicion that there may be a little market manipulation going on.  He is by far the most corrupt person to ever serve as president, so I am not going to be surprised if there is not a little insider trading to time the on and off to benefit his friends and family and his blind trust. 

Trump supporters do not get whiplash trying to follow Trumps tariffs and tariffs threats. They do not see a changing of his mind about a tariff as a backing down. They do not say Trump blinked. They say he is right when he is announcing a tariff and say how brilliant he is when he takes off a tariff. To his supporters he is exercising the art of the deal and playing three-dimensional chess and the rest of us are just too dumb to recognize his brilliance.  

When I look at Trump's tariff policy, I do not see a brilliant strategist playing three-dimensional chess; I see a three-year-old throwing a temper tantrum. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, May 23, 2025

Trump's image of dead 'white farmers' came from Congo, not South Africa

 


 by Rod Williams, May 23, 2025 - Trump is an idiot and the truth doesn't matter. His supporters do not care.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Court Restores Transit Grants Cancelled by Trump. This is a Victory for Constitutional Governance

by Rod Williams, May 22, 2025 - On May 20th, U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel ruled that the Trump administration must restore $14 million in transit grants that had been frozen. These grants were $4.7 million for charging stations and $9.3 million for bike lanes. The ruling prohibits federal officials from freezing or terminating the grants. This ruling restoring the grants were part of a lawsuit filed by Metro and other cities and nonprofits against the administration. 

Time and time again this has been the pattern. The Trump administration has ended a program or cancelled an awarded grant, and the Courts have reinstated the program.  This should be celebrated. Even if you think Nashville does not need more bike lanes or improved bus transit and even if you voted "no" in the referendum approving the Mayor's transit program, you should be pleased with this ruling.

The power of the purse belongs to Congress. These grants were part of congressionally approved funding and awarded based on approved procedures. I don't doubt that the Trump administration has attempted to end some programs and cut some spending that is wasteful.  I am sure I would approve some of the Trump cuts. I am a small government conservative and want the government to do less and tax and spend less. However, following the Constitution is more important than any particular cut to spending.

If we are a democracy, government spending can be cut if we elect people who think spending should be cut. If we are a dictatorship, then the president can determine how our tax money is spent. Democracy is messy and slow and requires persuasion and compromise. Dictatorship is much more efficient. We are not a dictatorship yet The President does not have the power to unilaterally impound funds.

In 1974, Congress enacted the Impoundment Control Act in response to attempts by the executive branch to refuse to spend congressionally appropriated funds. The act says the President must spend funds appropriated by Congress, unless otherwise authorized to withhold them. If the President wants to impound funds, there is a procedure for that.

It is easy to get discouraged as we watch our country slide into authoritarianism, but so far much of what Trump has tried to do has been thwarted.  Much that he has done is by executive order and can be undone by the next administration. 

After each new exposure of corruption, illegal impounding of funds, generating unnecessary chaos, security breach, violation of the rule of law, or act of cruelty, I keep thinking Republicans will finally say "enough already" and stop supporting him. It hasn't happened yet, but I keep thinking he will cross a line, and Republicans will rediscover they values and man-up and reign him in. Unfortunately, it has not happened yet. However, the 2026 mid-term elections will most likely result in a shift of power in the House and then Trump's wings can be clipped. 

While the administration has talked of suspending the Constitution, I do not think between now and the mid-terms, Donald Trump can transform America into a dictatorship. Our institutions and Constitutional order are badly battered but not broken. As we hold on and wait for this ugly period in our history to pass, be thankful for small victories like the court ruling restoring Nashville's transit grants. 
 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

Senator Maggie Hassan takes Kristi Noem to task on claim that Donald Trump can suspend habeas corpus

 


by Rod Williams, May 20, 2025 - It is freighting to think that this administration, or any administration, would consider suspending the right of habeas corpus. On the rare occasion that it has happened, it was in time of war and was approved by Congress. 

It is also freighting to think that the Director of Homeland Security does not even know what it is. When asked, she answered, "well habius corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country." What?? 

In this video, New Hampshire Senator Maggie Hassan questions Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on the White House's assertion that they can suspend habeas corpus over border concerns.  As Senator Hassan says, the right of habeas corpus is what separates us from police states like North Korea and Russia.

It seems that we are daily moving closer and closer to seeing our Constitution shredded and American ceasing to be a constitutional democracy.  It is so disappointing to see people who have professed to love the Constitution, not be alarmed at what is happening, and to actually embrace it. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Federal Court Rule in Middle TN Barring Lawyers from Speaking Publicly on Cases Scrapped in Victory for Free Speech

Daniel Horwitz

Key Points
  •  A rule in the Middle Tennessee’s federal district court that prevented public speech from lawyers on their cases was lifted on May 15.
  •  The rule was central to a lawsuit filed by local attorney Daniel Horwitz in 2024 after he was barred from speaking publicly about his cases against CoreCivic, the private prison company.

by Rod Williams, May 20, 2025- To read the full Tennessean story follow this link.
Daniel Horwitz is a local attorney who has been involved in several civil liberties cases in Nashville over the years, taking on big government's trampling of free speech rights and the imposition of bureaucratic policies that curtail liberties.  

I became acquainted with Horwitz back in about 2012 when he advocated for the right of a company to provide ridesharing service. This was before Uber was a thing, and the city was committed to protecting taxi companies from competition.  For more on that effort read  The indefensible public policy of shielding big taxi companies from competition, by Horwitz. I reported on developments in that fight extensively on this blog

In this current victory overturning a rule that curtailed the free speech rights of attorneys, Horwitz was represented by the Institute for Justice. The Institute for Justice is a non-profit civil liberties organization. They have been involved in several high-profile cases here in Nashville over the years. They were involved in the ridesharing case mentioned above. 

You may be familiar with the case Joy Ford. Joy Ford owned a small recording studio in the Music Row area and the city tried for years to take her property by imminent domain and sell the property to her bigger neighbor. Eventually Ford won. She was represented by The Institute for Justice.

Institute for Justice is one of the organizations I support with my charitable giving. To learn more about the organization, follow this link. Daniel Horwitz blogs Supreme Court of Tennessee Blog.

A big congratulations to Daniel Horwitz and The Institute for Justice. 



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Reflections on the Recent ICE Raids in Nashville

by Rod Williams, May 16, 2025- ICE recently removed what at first appears to be some really bad people from our community. 

Earlier this week Immigration and Customs Enforcement in a coordinated effort with the Tennessee Highway Patrol conducted nearly 600 traffic stops in the Nolensville Road area. The result of these stops was that 196 people were arrested. Of those arrested, DHS reports 95 had prior criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, and 31 were previously removed individuals who reentered the U.S. illegally. Some of these people were allegedly rapist and people charged with armed robbery and some were drug dealers. 

The first thing I question when learning of this is, is this true? Were there that many criminals and formerly deported among those stopped? Donald Trump lies constantly. Any sit-down conversation with a journalist or oval office news conference will contain numerous falsehoods uttered by Donald Trump. If one were writing a book titled, The One Thousand Lies of Donald Trump, they would not run out of material. His lies set the tone for those below him. 

The biggest lie of course is that the 2020 election was stolen. People who do not accept that lie are not welcome in the Trump administration and if already in responsible positions in the government are likely to be fired for not accepting the lie. When accepting a lie is a basic requirement to be in good standing with the administration, then lying becomes the currency of the realm. When one understands the desired narrative, the "facts" can be created to support the narrative. 

By claiming so many of the arrested were bad people this advances the Trump narrative that says undocumented immigrants are mostly bad people. I hate that I have reached a point that I no longer can accept as true something as basic as a statement telling me x number of those arrested were criminals, but that is where I am. Unless I have reason to believe something said by a Trump official, my default position is to doubt it. 

Mayor Freddie O'Connell has asked for a list of those arrested and the charges against them. He is right to do so. Until such a list is released, there is no reason to believe that the "facts" DHS is providing are real.

If one accepts what DHS tells us about the 600 traffic stops and if 196 warranted arrests, that is 32%. That is a lot of bad people. Of course, one must ask why did they warrant arrest? We just don't know. It may be that they were arrested for driving without a license. Since illegal immigrants cannot get a license, one would assume that the undocumented aliens stopped did not have a driver's license. Normally, driving without a license result in a ticket and not arrest, but I am not going to be shocked if most of the 196 who were arrested were not arrested for this misdemeanor offense. If so, they are not really bad people. I would like to know why they were arrested before I draw any conclusions about them.

If 95 of 600 are indeed criminals (or former criminals), that is 15%. That looks to be a high number. However, when you put it into perspective, it is really not that high. It is hard to know how many criminals are among us, but a random stop of Americans would probably show more than 15% to have a criminal record. According to the Brennen Center for Justice nearly one-third of the adult working age population has a criminal record and nearly half of black males and almost 40 percent of white males are arrested by the age 23. So, if 15% of those stopped have a rap sheet, that is actually a low percentage. This tells us that a way to lower the crime rate is to have more illegal immigration.

Of the 600 stopped, 5% had illegally entered the United States previously, been deported and reentered. It is hard to generate sympathy for these people, and I think they should be prosecuted and deported. However, 5% is not an alarming number. 

Often defenders of illegal immigration tell us that illegal aliens are heroic desperate people fleeing violence and poverty looking for a better life in America. Trump and his sycophants tell us that immigrants are rapist and murderers and really bad people, even saying they are eating our cats and dogs. This raid shows us they are just people. 

When the raid occurred, Mayor Freddie O'Connell said, “Our community’s strength lies in its diversity and the invaluable contributions of those who have chosen to make Nashville their home." Is that true? I think diversity can be oversold. There is something also to be said for homogeneity and compatibility in a society. I support toleration and acceptance, but I am not so sure that diversity for diversities sake is a strength. 

While I think many oversale diversity, it does make a community more interesting. It certainly leads to more great places to eat. When there is any influx of people from other lands, it improves the culinary landscape. It creates a more cosmopolitan atmosphere. As far as the "invaluable contribution," I think that may be oversold also. However, they do contribute to our economic well-being. Immigrants create a better life for the rest of us. They do the jobs we don't want to do. Look at any lawncare crew and it is made up mostly of Hispanics. I do my own lawncare, but I am the exception in my neighborhood. If we deport large numbers of undocumented aliens, middle class Americans will have to cut their own grass.

In landscaping, lawncare, construction, caregiving, cleaning hotel rooms, dishwashing, and many other fields, the people doing the work are immigrants and many of them are illegal immigrants. We need these people. When the traffic stops happened earlier this week, fear of arrest spread throughout the immigrant community and several of the big honkytonks on Lower Broad had to close their kitchens. Many of their employees simply did not show up for work. If mass deportation occurs or most self deport, we will miss them when they are gone. While I think some defenders of immigration, especially illegal immigration, may oversale the benefits of diversity and romanticize immigrants, I think it is fair to say we would be worse off if we lost the benefits of cheap immigrant labor. 

There is another reason we need immigrants. America, like many other wealthy advanced countries, has a declining birthrate. If one looks at Social Security as an example, it is essentially a transfer payment. People paying in today are the ones paying the benefits of those receiving Social Security today. We need more people, not only for Social Security but a declining population results in declining productivity. Unless Americans start having larger families we need immigrants. 

One thing that should be kept in mind in looking at the Nashville ICE traffic stops and other ICE raids, is that the people arrested under the ICE traffic stops were not arrested under authority of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. The application of that Act to remove illegal aliens is questionable. One can be consistent and oppose deportations under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and still favor immigration enforcement. Not all immigration enforcement is equally offensive. Deportation can be done and be done legally. While I do not think we need massive deportation, I am more concerned about the how of deportation than the deportation itself. While deportation by itself may not be in America's self-interest, it is the denial of due process and the trampling of the constitution that concerns me most.

When the traffic stops occurred resulting in arrest and hauling away in busses of the arrested, TV news reports showed crying mothers and children outside the bus reaching out to touch the window glass where their loved one was on the other side. It is heartbreaking and makes for good TV.  

The family separation angle of the story gets a lot of attention. One can sympathize with families who are separated from their loved ones but that should not dictate public policy. Family separation is a fact of life. When they came to America and furthermore when they committed crime, if they committed a crime, they should have known family separation was a possible outcome of their actions. It is sad when families are torn apart. We should have compassion. Avoiding family separation should be a factor in immigration policy. However, if should not be the sole determining factor. Family separation occurs when a spouse or parent or child is sent to prison. Family separation occurs when a member of the US armed forces is deployed. Family separation occurs when a divorce occurs, and a parent loses custody or is denied visitation. It is a tragedy and worthy of our sympathies but should not dictate policy. 

One aspect of the traffic-stop ICE operation earlier this week I have not heard addressed and to which I do not have an answer is, were the stops legal? I know that a police officer is not supposed to pull you over without probable cause. Often people who were obviously drunk or guilty of other crimes, have beat the charges against them because they were stopped without probably cause.  I know that law enforcement can sit up screening check points where every driver of every vehicle passing a certain point is screened for sobriety or driver's license or some other reason. That was not how these stops were conducted. Random vehicles were pulled over.  

I know the attitude of a lot of people when it comes to searches of their home or surveillance or being required to show identification is, "I have nothing to hide, I don't care." My view is we should always be vigilant about government violation of our rights. The Fourth Amendment says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Maybe I am missing something but from what I learn from news reports of the ICE stops, people were stopped without probable cause. If one has more insight on the legality of the stops, I welcome hearing it.


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories