Saturday, January 11, 2014

Nashville is on the New York Times' list of 52 Places to Go in 2014.

15. Nashville, Tenn.

Leather jackets and skinny jeans
join cowboy boots.
Country music lovers have long made the pilgrimage to Nashville, but now the city has fast gained cachet among rock fans and foodies. The city’s vibrant scene is home to the Black Keys, Kings of Leon, Jeff the Brotherhood and Diarrhea Planet, who all play in town occasionally. And a youthquake is transforming scruffy neighborhoods like 12South and East Nashville into hipster hubs. New hangouts include Pinewood Social, a bar, restaurant, bowling alley and karaoke joint, and the 404, a restaurant and boutique hotel in a former auto garage. Add to that a thriving culinary scene, exemplified by the Music City Eats Festival, back for a second year in September. And Nashville’s old standbys — like the honky-tonk Tootsie’s Orchid Lounge and the venerable Ryman — are as fun as ever. — STEVEN KURUTZ (link)
 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Democrat Terry Adams launches bid to unseat Lamar Alexander in ...

A Knoxville lawyer says he has the support of several top Democrats, who hope to avoid a repeat embarrassment.(read more and see the video)

I doubt Mr. Adams can unseat Alexander.  However, if Joe Carr should take the Republican nomination away from Alexander, I think Adams would stand a good chance at taking the seat.  After some of Carr's positions become known, such as his advocacy of nullification, Adams would be an attractive alternative for many moderate folks. Rod

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Liberty on the Rocks, Thursday, January 16, 2014

5:30 PM to

Mafiaoza's 2400 12th Ave S, Nashville, TN (map)
ask the hostess to direct you to our sectoin
Liberty on the Rocks is a great place to meet other people, have a beer and some great food. We promote thoughtful and rational discussion on a wide range of topics.
http://www.libertyontherocks.org

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, January 10, 2014

What happened at the Council meeting of Jan.7th with commentary and time stamp notation.



I am a little late getting around to analyzing the Council meeting of January 7th, so anything of any of any importance has probably already been learned. Nevertheless, here is my play-by-play and commentary.

If you want to follow along on the agenda, staff analysis and my analysis, then follow the link. This is a relatively short meeting at slightly under an hour.

There are 15 bill on public hearing and most are zoning bills. I do not attempt to report on zoning bills unless they are extremely controversial or for some reason the particular rezoning bill interest me. Rezoning bills usually interest no one except immediate neighbors.

The one bill of general interest is BILL NO. BL2013-629. This bill amends Metro's backyard chicken bill by removing the two-year sunset provision and also by expanding it to areas where it does not now apply. When the Chicken bill originally passed, several suburban Council members had their districts taken out of the bill.

Surprising to me, there is no one from the public in opposition. No one speaks on the bill and it passes on second reading. Here is the Tennessean's report on the bill: Backyard chickens might be allowed in all Nashville districts soon.

Councilman Bedne unsuccessfully attempts to get the bill deferred one meeting. Councilman Bennett successfully tables Councilman Bedne's deferral motion. The tabling motion passes by a vote of 24 yes, 11 no, 1 abstention, and 4 no votes. Most of the "no" votes are suburban council members. To view the vote go to time stamp 30:17.

Resolutions: All of those resolutions on the consent agenda pass and none are pulled. There are two bills not on the consent agenda. This one is of interest:

RESOLUTION NO. RS2014-948 which would appropriate $13,100,000 from the Undesignated Fund Balance of the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools General Purpose Fund to the Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools General Purpose Fund Operational Account for the purpose of funding the purchase of laptop computers, teacher technology training and a universal screener assessment for the implementation of Common Core testing, is deferred by voice vote.

The Director of Finance had refused to sign the resolution as to the availability of funds, saying it would be fiscally irresponsible to spend a significant amount from the schools fund balance giving the funding deficit projected by the schools going into the coming fiscal year. The bill was sponsored by Councilman Bo Mitchell.

Given that the school board lost millions of dollars of State funding by unnecessarily picking a fight with the State and defying the State by refusing to approve Great Hearts charter school and given the school board's continued blaming of their budget woes on charter schools, and given the hefty increase in funding they got last budget year, I am pleased to see this deferral and hope it is defeated when it come back up.

The other bill that is not on the consent agenda approves the license and franchise of Nashville Gas. Why it was deferred is not explained.

Bills on First reading all pass unanimously as is the custom of the council. There are twenty-five bills on first reading and most of them are rezoning bills. Here are three bills of interest:

  • ORDINANCE NO. BL2014-651 would establish new regulations of temporary music events.
  • ORDINANCE NO. BL2014-653 would restrict activity at historic home events. I don't know what is behind this but there are always some people who have a axe to grind with those historic homes that operate as Bed and Breakfast or special event facilities. 
  • ORDINANCE NO. BL2014-654 concerns beer sales and appears to expand the hours of operation of wholesale beer deliveries.

Bills on Second Reading:
  • BILL NO. BL2013-588 is a rezoning bill that would allow the demolition of three duplexes and allow the construction of eight cottage-type units as single family homes in the Woodland-in-Waverly community. This in my neighborhood. This neighborhood has an historic overlay, but the three duplexes are non-contributing to the historic character of the community. I support this bill. I think the duplexes are more out of character of the neighborhood than the cottages will be and I think this will be an improvement, but some in the community are very much opposed, concerned about increased density and additional on street parking. This bill is deferred.
  • BILL NO. BL2013-569 would change the regulations of car lots. This bill would remove the distinction between used car lots and new car lots and impose new restrictions. This bill was on first reading on public hearing on October 1 and to my surprise no one spoke on it on either side. From that meeting it was deferred to this meeting. This bill was disapproved by the planning commission. It is deferred.
  • BILL NO. BL2013-603 which would regulate small outdoor music events on commercial property is deferred "by rule." Why are we having all of this effort to regulate outdoor music? Maybe it is a problem, but I would want to be sure that this is necessary before I could support it. We should not be putting impediments in the way of making "music city," music city unless there is some serious reason why this is necessary.
  • BILL NO. BL2013-633 which would allow beer sales to began on Sunday at 10AM, passes.

Bills on Third Reading: 
BILL NO. BL2013-605 which would change the minimum fee that vehicles for hire are allowed to charge passes. This bill was necessary in order that app-based services like Lyft, Uber and Sidecar can operate in Nashville. There has been a realization on the part of those in the tourism industry that Nashville needs more public transportation options and more vehicles for hire.  I am very pleased this bill passes but would be more pleased it this bill established no minimum. A minimum is designed not to help consumers, but to protect providers of a service. I also would be more pleased if this bill removed the other onerous regulation of black sedans. This however, was big step in the right direction. 

To see my analysis of this bill and my extreme disappointment at one of those who voted against the bill, follow the links. In addition to the three who voted "no," there were 8 members who did not vote. To see how they voted, go to time stamp 51:44.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Marriage: Tennessee’s Number 1 Weapon Against Child Poverty


A dramatic rise in unwed births and the accompanying decline in marriage are the most important cause of child poverty in the state. As Chart 1 shows, in 2009, 43.5 percent of single-parent families with children in Tennessee were poor. In the same year, only 8.1 percent of married couples with children in the state were poor. Single-parent families were more than five times more likely to be poor than were married families.


Marriage and Child Poverty
The overwhelming majority of poor families with children in Tennessee are not married. (Overall, more than a third of all families with children at all income levels in the state are not married.) But a staggering 73 percent of all poor families with children in the state are unmarried. By contrast, married couples comprise only around one-quarter of poor families with children in the state. (See Chart 2.)


The higher poverty rate among single-mother families is caused by two factors: (1) the lower income caused by the absence of the father from the home, and (2) the lower average education levels among single mothers.



Marriage, Education, and Poverty

Births outside marriage in Tennessee occur predominantly among less-educated women. In Tennessee, 70.3 percent of births among women who are high school dropouts are out of wedlock. Among women who are college graduates, only 7.2 percent of births are out of wedlock. Ironically, the women most likely to have children without being married are those who have the least ability to support children on their own.

Tennessee is splitting into two separate castes. In the top half of the population, children are raised by married couples with a college education. In the bottom economic third of the population, children are raised by single mothers with a high school degree or less.

Policymakers clearly recognize that education reduces poverty, but they are largely unaware that marriage is an equally strong anti-poverty weapon. In Tennessee, married couples with children are 75 percent less likely to be poor than non-married families with the same level of education. In fact, a married family headed by a high school dropout in Tennessee is actually less likely to be poor than a non-married family headed by an individual with a few years of college.

Marriage and Child Poverty

 

Marriage, Poverty, and Race

Marriage substantially reduces the probability of poverty within all racial groups. For example, in Tennessee, non-married black families are nearly six times more likely to be poor than married black families. Non-married Hispanic families are three times more likely to be poor than married Hispanic families, while non-married white families are nearly six times more likely to be poor than married white families.

 

Marital Collapse: Not the Same as Teen Pregnancy

Unwed childbearing is often erroneously confused with teen pregnancy. In reality, only 8.6 percent of non-marital births in Tennessee occur to girls under age 18. Most non-marital births occur to young adult women in their early 20s. Lack of access to birth control is not a significant cause of non-marital births.



The Importance of Fathers

The positive effects of married fathers are not limited to income alone. Children raised by married parents have substantially better life outcomes compared to similar children raised in single-parent homes. When compared to children in intact married homes, children raised by single parents are more likely to have emotional and behavioral problems; be physically abused; smoke, drink, and use drugs; be aggressive; engage in violent, delinquent, and criminal behavior; have poor school performance; be expelled from school; and drop out of high school.[1] Many of these negative outcomes are associated with the higher poverty rates of single mothers. In many cases, however, the improvements in child well-being that are associated with marriage persist even after adjusting for differences in family income. This indicates that the father brings more to his home than just a paycheck.



Faulty Policies

Ignoring the positive impact of marriage on children leads to faulty government policies. Today,
billions are properly spent on the education of low-income youth. Billions more are spent each year on means-tested welfare aid for single mothers. But at present, Tennessee does little or nothing to discourage unwed births and nothing to encourage and strengthen healthy marriages.

Tragically, the critical facts about the importance of marriage in combating poverty are never communicated to youths at risk for future non-marital births. Similarly, the state welfare system ignores and disdains the institution of marriage: In fact, most welfare programs actively penalize low-income couples who do marry. Tennessee will continue to have high levels of child poverty, inequality, and welfare dependence as long as this governmental indifference and hostility to marriage persists.

Ironically, research shows that most unwed parents look favorably on the institution of marriage.[2] New policies should be developed that build on these attitudes. Government should provide factual information to at-risk youth about the value of marriage. It should also connect low-income couples with community resources that will help them relearn the skills needed to develop and sustain healthy marriages before bringing children into the world. Finally, the state welfare system should be reformed to encourage rather than discourage marriage.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

War on Poverty was lost. Promoting work and restoring marriage is a winning plan for eradicating poverty

Reposted from The Foundry January 8, 2014

When President Johnson launched the War on Poverty on Jan. 8, 1964, he pledged “not only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it.” Sadly, the half-century legacy of Johnson’s Great Society has not lived up to that noble goal.

The War on Poverty has not done justice to the poor. Our responsibility to our neighbors in need demands more: a redirection of public policy and a commitment from each of us to do what we can in our own communities.

Despite spending nearly $20 trillion since the War on Poverty began, the poverty rate remains nearly as high today as it was in the mid-1960s. Today, government spends nearly $1 trillion annually on 80 federal means-tested programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care and targeted social services for poor and low-income Americans. Clearly, policymakers can’t hide behind reams of programs and billions in spending and declare they’ve done their duty to the poor. Good intentions aren’t enough.

We need to change the character of public assistance. That means redirecting incentives in federal welfare programs. “Sometimes those incentives encourage dependence, even for generations,” said Robert L. Woodson, Sr., founder and president of the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, testifying before the Senate Budget Committee last year. Woodson sees firsthand the effects of these programs as he works with community leaders across the country to empower those in need to overcome adversity.

On the other hand, the right kind of incentives can “help people gain personal responsibility and
pursue their dreams,” observes Woodson. Transforming incentives to promote personal responsibility has a dramatic effect: After the 1996 welfare reform began to require recipients to work or prepare for work, welfare rolls fell by more than half, and poverty rates among single mothers and black children fell to historic lows. But that reform redirected the incentives of only one program among more than 80 federal welfare programs.

As Woodson concludes:
So if we want to help those in need, we need to ask: Is the approach we are taking to relieve poverty by what we call the safety net actually helping or is it injuring with the helping hand?
In addition to promoting work, any serious effort on behalf of those in need must get serious about restoring marriage, America’s most important inoculation against child poverty. Children born and raised outside of marriage are more than five times more likely to experience poverty than their peers raised in intact families.

When the War on Poverty began, 8 percent of all children in America were born outside marriage. Since the mid-’60s, unwed childbearing has skyrocketed to more than 40 percent of all births, and from 25 percent to about 73 percent among black children.

Rebuilding a culture of marriage calls for policy reform to reduce marriage penalties in welfare programs. It also requires the kind of relational restoration that must happen on a personal level, through the work of churches and community initiatives like First Things First in Chattanooga, TN, that build relational skills. These and other efforts to overcome poverty should engage us personally in the effort to help restore lives, families, and communities.

Promoting work and restoring marriage “would be a better battle plan for eradicating poverty in America than spending more money on failed programs,” writes Heritage Senior Research Fellow Robert Rector in today’s Wall Street Journal, “And it would help accomplish LBJ’s objective to ‘replace their despair with opportunity.’”

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Haslam Hints at Renewal of “Limited” Voucher Program, Still Leery of Kelsey Plan

From Memphis Flyer, January 9th, 2014:

“We’re going to make our recommendation next week. As you know, we favored a more limited approach to school vouchers. I still think that’s the right one, because it’s focused on those lowest performing schools which are actually..., a lot of which are our responsibility now in the Achievement School District and others.

“So in something like this we think it makes sense to take a more measured approach as you look at vouchers, and let’s see the impact. There’s a lot of concern as to the effect it has on an existing school system, and how much difference does it make for the student. As the physician, operating on ourselves first, we think, makes lot of sense.”

The governor was asked about a more extensive (and expensive)voucher program proposed last year by state Senator Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown), who has said he will offer it again this year. At the end of last year’s session, Haslam asked his legislative sponsor, state Senate Majority Leader Mark Norris, to pull the more moderate gubernatorial pilot program rather than submit it to the changes desired by Kelsey.

“You know, we obviously last year felt much more comfortable with our position. We want to come up with something that’s the best idea. Last year, we didn’t hear another approach that we thought made sense, given everything else we have going on in education.” (link)
My Comment: I am pleased to see that the Governor is again going to propose a school voucher program.  While I am an advocate of school choice including charter schools, magnet schools, and vouchers, I think the Governor's more cautious,  implementable approach is preferable to a massive implementation of a voucher program all at once. I think we should implement the Governor's limited plan and if it is promising and has good results, then we should expand it.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, January 09, 2014

Top 10 Ways Congress Wasted Your Money in 2013

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Lamar's "Standing Up For Tennessee" Television Advertisement

Lamar Alexander’s re-election campaign today announced the launch of its first 2014 television advertisement “Standing Up for Tennessee.”  The 60-second television spot airs statewide beginning Jan. 13.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Update: Did Lamar Alexander vote in the Democrat 2012 Primary? Apparently not so.

That is what the Washington Times is reporting this morning. "NASHVILLE, TN, January 9, 2014 – According to official state voter roll calls, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) voted in the 2012 Tennessee Democratic Primary." (link) If that is correct, that is very strange. Even Democrats didn't vote in the Democrat primary in 2012.  That was the year that the nomination for senator was won by nut-job Mark E. Clayton in a field of unknowns.

Update: Apparently that was false story. According to the Tennessean, the Blount County Election Administrator says Alexander voted in the Republican primary and the Washington Times has withdraw the story. (link)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

1st Tuesday to meet Monday Jan. 13 and feature an AMP debate

From 1st Tuesday:

Our JAN meeting is ON for Monday, the 13th - AND - tomorrow it will be warmer! Our meeting will feature the $175,000,000 HOT topic known as AMP. Have you heard of AMP ????

AMP is Mayor Dean's idea of creating a dedicated lane in the middle of the road FOR BUSES ONLY running from east Nashville - through downtown - coming up Broadway - extending out West End and running all the past St. Thomas Hospital and ending at roughly White Bridge Road. As stated, the initial price of AMP is $175,000,000. Projected annual operating cost of AMP are expected to exceed $4,000,000.

Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce President Ralph Schulz and his team will be there to advocate for AMP. Dr. Malcolm Getz from Vanderbilt and his team will join us to challenge AMP. I have asked both sides to come prepared with facts, charts and presentations that can stand up to the scrutiny 1ST TUESDAY members are well known for !

The stakes are high. The affects and results of this debate will alter Nashville's future. The political implications are immense. No matter if you end up for it ... or opposing... everyone can agree ..... AMP is a BIG deal !!!

As usual, we will meet at WALLER LAW - 511 Union Street - 27th floor. Doors will open at 11AM for Coffee & Social Time... Lunch will be start at 11:30 and our program will start promptly at Noon. Each side will get "about 12 minutes" to make their case with about 2 minutes for follow-up comments before our noted Q&A session starts. I will cut the Q&A off at 1PM...but both sides will be around for a bit to answer additional questions.

As my little mother would say... " this meeting is going to be a DOOOZZY" !! Expect to see multiple current members of the Metro Council... and potential candidates who could end up dealing with AMP in the days to come.

If you have not already done so, you can secure your seat... and seating for any guests .. by visiting our 1ST TUESDAY website and clicking on Shopping Cart. If you have not already taken care of your 2014 MEMBER dues.. please do so !!

Reminder -- US Senator RAND PAUL will be our guest speaker Monday, FEB 10th. Our limited seating will first be made available to 2014 MEMBERS. Seats have been going briskly, so if you want to join us on FEB 10th... let me encourage you not to delay !

See you Monday !! ... [yes, Monday, JAN 13th... and Monday, FEB 10th ]

Till then, stay warm,
Tim Skow Host of 1ST TUESDAY

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Joe Carr raises $250K in fourth quarter

Challenger to Sen. Alexander raises $250K in fourth quarter The Hill (blog)

Joe Carr's campaign announced raising the quarter million on Tuesday, but declined to release the amount of cash he has in the bank to take on ...

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories