Top Stories
Sunday, June 23, 2019
TORI GODDARD STATEMENT ON NASHVILLE’S FALSE ALARM TORNADO SIRENS AFTER EXPIRATION OF TORNADO WARNING
Top Stories
The Tennessean's candidate's questionaire for candidates seeking the office of mayor, vice mayor, council member at-large or district council member.
The Tennessean sent a 25-question survey to all candidates seeking the office of mayor, vice mayor, council member at-large or district council member. Questions asked include a question about if the candidate supported a tax increase, if the candidate supported incentives for corporations to locate to Nashville, if and how the Council should exert influence over the School Board and a question about the candidates priorities for Nashville. In addition to the questions about policy, candidates were asked their age, education, job history, and family status.
Of the 110 candidates seeking office, 95 responded. In my view any candidate who did not complete the survey should not be considered a serious candidate. Below are links to the questionnaire.
Top Stories
Saturday, June 22, 2019
Immigrants group (TIRRC) endorses five pro-llegal immigrantion candidates for at-large.
![]() |
| Zulfat Suara |
![]() |
| Fabian Bedne |
Allen, Bedne and Mendes are incumbent council members. Bedne and Zulfat Suara are first generation immigrants. Cicola Lane was the primary leader of the effort that led to the adoption of Nashville's police Community Oversight Board. Should Zulfat Suara be elected she would be the first Muslim to serve in the Council.
Council Mendes was the sponsor of two bills in the Council that that would have came close to making Nashville a sanctuary city. Technically, Nashville may still not have fit the definition but
we would have been close. No doubt if the bills would have passed there would have been push back from the State.
One of the bills would have required Metro to terminate its contract with the U.S. Marshals Service to hold illegal aliens charged with federal crimes. The other ordinance would have required that, unless required by federal or state law or a court order, Metro may not use its money, resources, or facilities to assist in enforcing federal immigration laws, or to share information about a person’s custody status or court dates. It also would also prohibited Metro requesting
![]() |
| Gicola Lane |
![]() |
| Bob Mendes |
![]() |
| Burkley Allen |
In making their endorsements, TIRRC highlighted Mendes' push in the council, with the support of Allen, Bedne, to end Metro cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies. "We’re proud to endorse this slate of progressive candidates who will ensure the Metro Council better reflects our community and our values," said a spokesman.
That these five candidates got the endorsement of an organization which opposes enforcement of immigration laws, is reason enough to oppose them. (The source of the quotes came from this Tennessean article.)
Top Stories
Thursday, June 20, 2019
Ray Clemmons gets the teacher's union endorsement
Ray Clemmons gets the teacher's union endorsement: ..."I am prepared to lead and make the tough decisions necessary to fully
fund our schools, support our educators, and provide every child across
Nashville with a high-quality education," he (Clemmons) said. "I am truly thankful
for the support of MNEA and look forward to working together for the
benefit of all students in the years to come."
Rod's Comment: "Fully Fund" has a specific meaning. It means to give the Board of Education what ever amount they say they need. That is a blank check. The school board asked for a budget of $962 million this year which is $76.7 million budget more, or an 8.6 percent increase, over its current $886.3 million budget. This is at the same time that enrollment is dropping. That budget request called for a salary step increase and a 10 percent cost of living for employees. It asked $852,000 for what they called "Care Centers" to help with student behavioral
needs and $850,000 to add professional development days for
para-professionals and it called for several added administration positions.
The School Board asked for much more than the Director of School told the Board he needed. Dr. Joseph's budget called for $31.7 million in new funding. Mayor Briley's budget, which was just approved, gives the schools a $28.2 million increase.
To vow to "fully fund" the schools is irresponsible. I guess that is the price of getting the teacher's union enforcement. This pledge is reason enough to vote against Ray Clemmons for mayor. If he is elected I feel certain we will have a massive tax increase next year. If Briley should be reelected I suspect he will give us a big tax increase also, but it would probably me less than we would get under Clemmons. I don't know that we will not have a tax increase even if Cooper is elected, but he is talking about cutting waste and improving management. I believe Cooper may avoid a tax increase if elected or if he does propose a tax increase it would be considerably less than what we would get with Briley and much, much less than what we would get under Clemmons.
For more on the issue of the school budget see these links: link, link,
Top Stories
The Metro government policy to destroy more affordable housing
by Rod Williams, 6/20/2019- Almost ever politician running for office or holding office list "affordable housing" as a major issue facing our city. The media and non-profit organization and opinion leaders do also. As Nashville has grown, property values have increased. When more people making the big bucks move to the city, they are going to drive up housing cost. It is inevitable. Some at the lower end of the economic scale are hurt as the city becomes more prosperous and they can not find housing they can afford. Renters find their home sold off to developers who build larger more expensive housing. Government wants to spend million and millions to build and subsidize affordable housing and if not prohibited from doing so by the state, would have forced private developers to build affordable housing with a policy called "inclusionary zoning."
So while government and civic leaders bemoan the loss of affordable housing, there is a certain hypocrisy going on. While, no doubt, most of the property value increases are driven simply by demand, much of the fault for loss of affordable housing, is directly due to government policy.
To add to the loss of affordable housing that has already occurred, Metro is getting ready to destroy some of the last remaining affordable housing in Nashville. There is an article in today's Tennessean, East Nashville's longtime red-light district readies for transformation, that explains this.
The Dickerson Road area has long been one of the cheapest parts of the city to live. In addition to affordable apartment buildings along Dickerson, the neighborhoods adjacent to the thoroughfare have lots of modest affordable homes. On Dickerson Road there are several old-fashion junky trailer parks. On Dickerson Road itself there are businesses that serve the people who live in the vicinity. There are businesses such as laundromats, payday lenders, convenience stores, and discount tobacco stores, and used car lots. Dickerson Road has always had a problem with hookers walking the street and the area has a lot of drug dealers.
Metro has a plan to improve this bad part of town. The plan envisions a dense collection of modern offices, shops and multifamily housing, widened streets and added transit hubs, greenways, crosswalks, sidewalks and bike lanes. The city is going to beautify and upgrade one of the worst parts of the city. The Tennessean says, "But the increased investment is expected to send property values soaring
in one of the few areas where relatively affordable housing can still
be found near downtown." I am pleased to see this recognition of the effect of improving parts of the city.
We are talking about hundreds of units of housing are going to be lost. Thousands of people will no longer be able to afford to live there. Some of the people living in trailer parks rent by the week. Where are they going to go? No one likes to have a seedy part of town, but when you beautify and upgrade a seedy part of town you are destroying the only place poor people can afford to live. Every community can't look like Brentwood and still have affordable housing.
Less ambitious than a master plan such as is planned for Dickerson Road are city policies that little by little destroy affordable communities and thereby affordable housing. These are policies that make busy corridors look nice. These are rules which say used car lots must have an attractive decorative fence in front of them, that say one can not have in close proximity businesses of the same or similar type such as used tire stores and auto repair businesses, and rules that say all dumpsters must be placed on a reinforced concrete pad behind the building, and rules that require a certain distance between pay day lenders. These rules drive out the kind of business that serve low-income people. They make unattractive parts of town more attractive and change the character of the community and make it attractive for people who make more money. They turn low-income parts of town into middle-income parts of town.
Another way in which Nashville destroys affordable housing is by the policy of making large parts of the county single-family only. Almost every Council meeting, there is a bill to down-zone a neighborhood from a zoning which allows duplexes to a zoning which does not. Such legislation may change a zoning from R20 to RS20. I understand people wanting to preserve the character of their neighborhood. I understand people wanting things to stay the same. However, this has an impact on future home prices. This makes future affordable housing less likely and it encourages urban sprawl. With higher density, there are fewer places to build houses and this causes the available places to be more expensive. Also, with less available building spaces close in, it causes people to move further out.
Another way the city causes a loss of affordable housing is by driving up the cost of development and stifling the development of more affordable housing. Take the policy that requires a sidewalk in front of every house. Sidewalks can add thousands of dollars to a the price of a house. This means developers will build more expensive homes rather than less expensive homes to absorb in the home price the cost of the sidewalks. Also, I have talked to developers who say they have tried to build communities of affordable housing and instead of getting assistance from planning, they got obstacle after obstacle thrown in their way. It is simply easier to build pricey homes rather than affordable homes.
Another way government destroys affordable housing, is my stringent codes enforcement. I own a little rental house in Woodbine. I only own one rental property. It is the house I lived in myself until I moved to my current home. It is a two-bedroom one-bath house. Recently I got a codes complaint and I had to deal with it. It is not the first time. It was a headache and an annoyance. I have a tenant who has different taste than I do and likes "yard art." He also keeps a lot of stuff that he might can sell to make a little money. The stuff was stored neatly in covered storage. He also was parking a car on an unpaved or graveled area.
I only charge the tenant a modest price for rent. I could put central heat and air in the house and dress it up just a little and rent it for about half again what I am getting, or I could sell the house. I get about two postcards a week from someone wanting to buy that house. If I sold it they would tear it down, and build an expensive house on the lot.
Quite frankly, I don't need the money I could get from selling the house or from upgrading and raising the rent. My tenant is a Cuban refugee who really did come to America by a raft made of intertubes. He has been here about twenty years or so but has a heavy accent and little education. He makes a living by selling scrap metal. He would have a difficult time paying more rent. I rent to him at a modest rent more out of a sense of doing a good deed than anything else. When I get a codes letter, however, I am tempted by the postcard offers to buy my house. I have talked to other landlords who get harassed by codes. I know we have to have codes enforcement, but there is an effect. When codes officials harass property owners they destroy affordable housing.
The other way Metro government contributes to the loss of affordable housing is by refusing to zone property for greater density if what is planned to be build on the property is affordable housing. Worse yet, is the taking away of ones property rights in order to stop them from building affordable housing. This was attempted in Antioch. Ultimately, the person's property rights were not taken but the threat hung over the owners head for two years and the affordable property was never build.
The loss and increasing lack of affordable housing is of concern, but much of the blame can be laid at the doorstep of the same people who bemoan the fact that we are losing affordable housing. You can't have affordable housing if you don't want affordable neighborhoods. You can't have affordable housing and have every neighborhood look like Brentwood. You can't have affordable housing, if you are going to ban greater density or fight having affordable housing in your neighborhood.
Top Stories
Wednesday, June 19, 2019
This is who is running in the 13th District: Dan Meridith, Russ Bradford, and Andrew Dixon
The Tennessean analyzed the Council race for the 13th District and you can read their story at this link.
| Dan Meridth |
Dan is plain spoken freely expresses himself and is not politically correct and this has gotten him in trouble at times. His critics have called him racist, homophobic and misogynist. Some of these charges are explored in the Tennessean article. While I would not express things in exactly the same way Merideth does, I do not believe him to be guilty as characterized. Often these label are attached to people to simply keep others from expressing a view contrary to liberal orthodoxy and to stifle debate. I believe him to be a good man. He is the candidate I am supporting in this district. For more information visit his campaign website.
![]() |
| Russ Bradford |
| Andrew Dixon |
When asked why he is running, he says, "Our district has not had a voice and we're fed up with not being heard.." That seems to be a slap at Councilmember Huezo. He talks about "investing" in teachers, police, our fire fighters, and not in downtown businesses. For more information, visit his campaign website.
Top Stories
No TAX Hike! Metro Council fails to pass substitute budget with a property tax hike
I am surprised. I was almost certain one of the three proposed tax increase budgets would pass. I was favoring the Glover substitute, because it raised taxes the least. My support was simply a pragmatic calculating. I prefer a no tax increase budget but did not think one could pass. Looking at the make up of the Council, knowing of Metro's dire financial situation, perceiving the mayor to be weak, and looking at the number of Council members in either safe seats or not seeking reelection, I thought the Council was almost certain to pass a tax increase of some amount. That shows you how much I know. I miscalculated. I was wrong, but I am not disappointed. I am pleased the no tax increase budget passed.
Going into tonight meeting there was three proposed substitute budget proposals, so the council had four options to consider, the three substitute options each of which raised taxes and then the mayors budget which did not. The process involved considering the budget presented by Council member Vercher. Her budget proposal was the recommendation of the Budget and Finance Committee and would have raised taxes the most. After her budget was introduced, then there were attempts to amend her proposal with first one and then the other alternatives. Both attempts failed, so then the Council was faced choosing Vercher's bill, which would raise taxes more than the two rejected alternatives, or the mayor's no-tax-increase budget. Vercher's proposal failed by only one vote.
Metro's new budget is $2.33 billion with revenue increases of $101 million but about $44 million will go to rising debt obligations. Debt obligations have to be paid. Not paying our debts in not an option. It provides a $28.2 million increase for Metro Schools and a 3% pay
increase for school employees.
I am posting this with some still unanswered questions. Budget's are required to balance; revenues have to equal expenditure. Briley calculated income from the proposed parking privatization deal as the source of $17 million for this year's budget. With the parking deal put on hold, I do not know how they filled that hole. Most likely reserves were permitted to dip, but I don't know that.
For more on Metro's budget here are some resources.
- Metro Government website: Citizens' Guide to the Metro Budget
- The Tennessean: Nashville Mayor David Briley and council finance chair Tanaka Vercher spar over dueling budgets. This reports on the amount of tax increase of each of the three alternatives and what each would have funded and how much revenue each would have raised. Of course, this all kind of irrelevant at this point.
- The Tennessean: A cruel paradox: Despite thriving economy, Nashville struggles to fund schools, city services
Top Stories
Monday, June 17, 2019
At-large candidate Matthew DelRossi arrested for violating an order of protection and vandalized his sister's home. Embarrassing video.
Below is a video of at-large candidate Matthew DelRossi ranting about a camera mounted on the house next door pointing into his yard. Be aware that this video is laced with profanity.
He was arrested on June 10th for violating an order of protection and vandalized his sister's home. He threw shovels, a fishing pole, a stick and a pickax at the
security camera mounted on his sister's house. This is not DelRossi's first brush with the law.
Last year, he ran for the office of Vice mayor and got 12.5 percent of the vote, which was enough to keep either of the two other candidates from winning a majority and forced a runoff. To see the Tennessean's report on this incident follow this link.
Top Stories
Two Candidate forums Tuesday, June 18th. District 7 and District 18.

There are a bunch of Candidates running in District 7. Below are their names and links to their webpage, Facebook page or any other information I could find and something about them, if I know anything.
Clint Camp: He supports the Robert Mendez's proposed 16% tax hike. link. link.District 7 is the District in East Nashville currently represented by Anthony Davis. For District information, follow this link.
Stephen Downs:He has the screwy idea the companies have to get city permission before they are allowed to move here. link,
Daniel Fitzpatrick: No info found.
Jacob Green: No info found.
Stephanie Johnson: No info found.
Randy Reed: He is a retired police officer. He unsuccessfully ran for this office in 2015. See Is a dirty cop the kind of person who should serve in the Metro Council.
Two candidates running in the 18th District.
Tom Cash: Endorsed by the local chapter of SEIU.Endorsed by the Central Labor Council of Nashville and Middle Tennessee Facebook page, Web page.District 18 is the district currently represented by Burkley Allen. It is in the Hillsboro Village, West End part of town.
John Green: Facebook, web page.
Top Stories
Sunday, June 16, 2019
The 'it city' struggles to fund the basics
The Tennessean: The 'it city' struggles to fund the basics.
This article does a fairly good job of laying out the process by which this thriving, growing city finds itself broke. The article does not, however, expose the effects of our financial woes, such as teacher and police retention problems, understaffed fire services, traffic lights not synchronized, and sidewalks that are not build and roads not paved. The article does not expose the wasteful spending, the mismanagement, and corruption, and cronyism that contributes to Nashville's financial woes.
Top Stories
Robert Swope's tribute to his father
Top Stories






