link
Top Stories
A right-leaning disgruntled Republican comments on the news of the day and any other thing he damn-well pleases.
By Charles A. Trost, Professor of Law, Belmont University, Nashville Business Journal, Jun 4, 2021 - No one likes to pay taxes, and many people think the taxes they pay are too high. The recent controversy over the property tax rate in Metropolitan Nashville has brought the issue of property taxes into the public discussion and brought on litigation. ....
July 10, 2021 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
298 Brymer Creek Rd, McDonald, TN 37353
Get tickets now- limited seating
Of the largest 169 MSA's, Memphis is ranked 31st with the most delinquent FHA mortgages, Nashville is ranked 33rd, Knoxville is ranked number 91, and Chattanooga ranked 105.
Here is the list of the top ten cities with delinquent mortgages:
For more on this topic and source material see link and link.
NFIB press release, NASHVILLE (June 3, 2021) – A record-high 48% of small business owners nationwide in May reported unfilled job openings (seasonally adjusted), according to NFIB’s monthly jobs report. May is the fourth consecutive month of record-high readings for unfilled job openings and is 26 points higher than the 48-year historical reading of 22%.
by Rod Williams, 6/2/2021- Well, surprise, surprise! Most citizens who took part in the public hearing on the Metro budget, think Metro does not spend enough money. I did not watch last nights' public hearing on the metro budget. Metro has not posted the video of last night's meeting yet and when they do I may watch it but I have read various news reports and seen excerpts of the meeting and have a feel for how it went. Even without reading news reports of last night's meeting however, I could almost be safe in telling you what happened. I have watched Metro budget public hearings now for many years and by now I can tell you how it goes. Conservatives are nowhere to be found. No one, or almost no one, speaks out for the elimination of waste or advocates for greater government efficiency or privatization of government services. Conservatives only show up in years in which there is likely to be a big tax increase.
By contrast, liberals advocate for more spending and bigger government constantly. Advocates of higher taxes and bigger government turn out in droves. Each government function has its own advocacy group. Council members hear from Friends of the Library, Friends of the Parks, advocates for the homeless, advocates for public arts funding, advocates for sidewalks, advocates for affordable housing, and lots of advocates for more funding for public education.
In recent years, and more so this year, liberal social justice warriors speak with a loud voice. This year a coalition of liberal organizations called "Nashville People's Budget Coalition" advocated for less police funding and different priorities. They opposed a new police prescient for Antioch and any increase in police funding and instead wanted more funding for mental health programs, affordable housing, and other social programs.
Jonathan Williamson told the Council, "As a proud Black man born and raised in Nashville I do not feel comfortable with increased policing tactics and surveillance. My concern is that increasing MNPD funding would only add to the strategic oppression and armed militarization of tactics that have already decimated countless family and friends in my community."
Reverend Vahisha Hasan told the Council, "to be the most clear, the safest communities are not the ones with the most police but the ones with the most resources.”
This year for the first time ever, or at the first time that I recall, the mayor is proposing to "fully fund" the school budget. To "fully fund" the school budget means to give the School Board 100% of the funding they request. Many of the council members now serving ran on a platform to "fully fund" the school budget. In essence, they promised to give the schools a blank check.
Despite the mayor's budget proposing to "fully fund" the schools and despite that a sizeable number of council members pledging to fully fund the schools, advocates of public schools want more. They want more than the school board asked for. They want the budget to fund "social emotional learning" and other perceived needs.
To view news reports on the budget, follow these links:
News 4: Nashvillians advocate for budget priorities at Tuesday's Metro Council meeting
News Channel 5: Public weighs in on the budget.
The Tennessean: Critics assail restructured Nashville budget ahead of final council vote.
by Rod Williams - At a rally in Dallas yesterday, retired General and former National Security advisor Michale Flynn called for a military coup. The video is above. Please watch it. There is no other interpretation of what happened. During Q&A an audience member asked Flynn why we could not have a coup in America like they had in Myanmar and Flynn answered, "No reason, it should happen here."
This is the text:
Questioner: I want to know why what happened in Mynarmar can't happen here?
Flynn: No reason, it should happen here.
(Wild applause and cheering from the audiance)
Flynn was the featured speaker at a four-day, “For God & Country Patriot Roundup” QAnon conference in Dallas Texas. Conspiracy theorist attorney Sydney Powell, was another featured speaker.
This is not the first time Flynn has called for a military coup. In my view, Flynn should be court-martialed. I am disgusted with Flynn and Republicans who are supporting him. I always thought the threat to American democracy would come from the left, but it looks like I was wrong. The threat to our democracy is from right-wing nut jobs like General Flynn and Q-anon and assorted groups like Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. Unfortunately, it is just not the loony fringe we have to worry about but the Republicans who defend their actions and cheer them on.
Now, Flynn is trying to deny he said what he said; watch the video for yourself.
Some Republican Trumpinistas are making excuses or justifying right-wing radicalism. One tactic is to say, "Well, what about BLM and Antifa and the insurrection, arson, and murders committed by left-wing activists last summer?" That is no defense. I deplore left-wing insurrection. That is a reason to call for law and order; not a justification for a military coup.
Another tactic is to denounce the people reporting the story. This story was first reported by The Huffington Post. I admit the liberal bias of that publication but HP did not stage that video in a studio. I run into this all of the time. If I post anything from HP, CNN, Washington Post, the New York Times, or The Atlantic, I can expect a "Huffington Post?" or "Consider the source," comments. I know some liberals are equally quick to dismiss any news coming from Fox, or The Washington Times, or Business Insider, or The Wall Street Journal. I don't trust the analysis of liberal outlets but they don't just make up the news. And just because liberals dismiss news from conservative news sources, are we to be equally as closed-minded?
While HP broke this story, now many other outlets have reported it. If you don't trust HP, do a Google search and pick your news outlet.
I expect to be denounced for my position on this issue. Also, I will not be surprised if I am not informed, I am on the enemies list to be taken out when the Trumpinistas come to power. I have received similar death threats in the past and I am just this little powerless blogger typing away on my laptop. Some, not all but some, of the Trumpinistas are dangerous nuts.
My friend Mark Rogers, a long-time Republican activist posted something similar to what I have just posted regarding General Flynn and has been raked over the coals. To see the Facebook discussion generated by Mark Roger's comment, follow this link.
Rod's comment on the below article: As one who spent over 25 years working in the field of affordable housing and more years than that in other related real estate fields, I continue to have an interest in the topic of affordable housing. There was a time when people with jobs that paid a modest income could, nevertheless, expect to achieve the dream of homeownership. That dream is fading for many people. It is a shame. Last year in Nashville, the average home increased in value by $32,000.
In addition to having an interest in the topic due to my background, I have been more cognizant of what is happening in housing due to the fact that my son-in-law and daughter are shopping for a home. I am in a position to help them get into a home and will, but for young couples of modest income who do not have parents able to help them, there is simply no way that most of them can buy a house. Also, trends show that it will even be more difficult to buy a house in the future.
The answer to this problem does not lie in greater government subsidies for affordable housing. The amount that the government can appropriate to make housing more affordable will only be a drop in the bucket as to what is needed to make a difference. Also, imposing price controls or forcing developers to provide affordable housing will distort the market and may make things worse, not better.
Also, the government applying pressure to lenders to force them to make loans to people who do not meet lending criteria may lead to a new housing crisis like that of 2007. With the new government emphasis on "equity," I fear that is where we are headed. It is as if we learned nothing from what happened in 2007.
There are things locally the government can do to help, or if not help, the local government can stop policies that are making the problem worse. In an article, My advice to Mayor Cooper's newly appointed affordable housing task force, I laid out some of these. If the city would follow my advice, that might help somewhat at the local level but this problem cannot be solved only at the local level.
In this article by Edward J. Pinto of the American Enterprise Institute, he explores the destructive role of easy money policies and how that is pushing up the cost of housing.
The Fed’s easy credit policies are widening wealth inequality as they fuel persistent home price inflation
by Edward J. Pinto, June 1, 2021 - At his April 28th press conference, Chairman Powell’s statements made clear that the Fed does not understand how house price inflation differs from inflation for commodities and services. He stated that “these one-time increases in prices are likely to have only transitory effects on inflation” and added “In the near term, 12-month measures of PCE inflation are expected to move above 2 percent as the low readings from early in the pandemic fallout of the calculation and past increases in oil prices pass through to consumer energy prices.” Finally, that the Fed’s response has been “guided by our mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices for the American people….”
These statements are hard to reconcile with the fact that home prices have been anything but stable. Since late-2020 year-over-year home price appreciation has been in the low- to mid-double digits. This boom in prices is an acceleration of a trend that began in 2012. Since then the price of constant quality lower priced homes has doubled, while the Fed’s preferred general inflation measure has increased by 16%. And, over the next 12 months, the AEI Housing Center expects the price of such homes to increase another 12-15%. For first time buyers these increases will be anything but transitory, as they form the future price base and will make homes increasingly unaffordable.
Powell went on to add: “There is no question, though, that housing prices are going up. And so we’re watching that carefully. It’s partly because there’s clearly strong demand and there’s just not a lot of supply right now. So builders are, you know, struggling to keep up with the demand, clearly. Inventories are tremendously low…. [i]f you’re an entry-level housing buyer this is a problem because it just is going to be that much harder for people to get that first house…. And, you know, my hope would be that over time housing builders can react to this demand and come up with more supply, and workers will come back to work in that industry.”
This is a simplistic view. As land economist Richard Ratcliffe observed over 70 years ago: “The essential nature of housing demand is changeability; the nature of housing supply is rigidity.” The Fed’s easy credit continues to drive housing demand higher, but has done little to boost supply. Further, home prices are sticky, unlike lumber and other commodities, which price levels rise and fall by substantial amounts regularly. Since 1993, lumber futures prices have doubled or more on 7 separate occasions. Over the trading period of May 10 – June 1 lumber futures have dropped 25%.”
For decades, the Fed has used lower interest rates to inflate asset prices, in particular those of stock and real estate, with the goal being to generate a wealth effect. But this effect largely accrues to the benefit of those households that already own stocks and bonds. The Fed’s own data confirm this. In July 1991 the Fed funds target was 5.80%. At that point, the bottom 50% of households had 4.1% percent of all household wealth. At the end of 2020, the overnight target is 0.00%-0.25% and the bottom 50% had 2.1% of all household wealth.
The Fed’s easy credit policies are creating a growing housing affordability crisis for lower-income families, who are increasingly crowded out of the home buying market and putting homeownership out of reach for millions. With accommodative monetary conditions likely remaining in place for the foreseeable future, the Fed’s policies are having a disparate impact which will lead to a slowing of gains in racial integration, a widening of wealth inequality, a further increase in socio-economic stratification, and a reduction in home ownership rates. Quite an accomplishment for an agency with a stated goal of “stable prices for the American people.”
As a society, how will we reckon with just how expensive housing has become and the resulting decline in the opportunity for homeownership? Long-time Fed chair Marriner Ecles faced a similar situation in 1947. The price of houses had “advanced by 25 to 35 per cent during the past two years. A large number of families of moderate and low income have been encouraged to assume mortgage debt which will be beyond their means…. Sellers and builders of houses have been enabled to make exorbitant profits.”
He gave this advice to Congress, which is still applicable today:
If the easy credit situation were producing a substantial additional volume of housing at supportable values in the long run, it would be justified, but because of the limitations of labor and materials it produces, instead, a dangerously inflated market which cannot be sustained for both new and old houses. I believe that by curtailment of credit for housing in closer relationship to the supply of labor and materials, the price trend would be reversed and a market for houses assured over a long period of years. Good low-cost housing cannot be built with high-cost materials and high-cost labor. Neither Government nor private industry can produce this miracle.
Housing inflation was tamed and we entered a 25-year period where new home construction kept up with demand, with the result being that real home prices declined slightly over the period. Mr. Chairman, stop spiking the monetary punchbowl. Mr. Chairman, stop buying 30-year agency MBS.
Mr. Chairman, you owe the American people nothing less.
Accountability or hypocrisy: Why the TN Democratic Party decertified Madison County, what key members are saying
Good evening,