Why We Do Not Need to Bring Back the Fairness Doctrine

Rod Williams: If this becomes the platform
 of the Democratic Party, I likely vote for
Trump's anointed successor.

Michael Dioguardi

by Michael Dioguardi, Guest Editorial, Nov. 9, 2025-The Fairness Doctrine represents one of the clearest examples of government overreach into the marketplace of ideas. By mandating that broadcasters present “contrasting viewpoints” on controversial issues, the government assumed the role of arbiter of truth and balance, effectively deciding which perspectives deserved airtime. This inherently conflicts with the First Amendment: free speech is not a privilege granted by the state, and the government has no legitimate authority to determine what constitutes fair or balanced discourse. In practice, the Doctrine chilled speech rather than enhancing it, as broadcasters often avoided controversial topics entirely to minimize regulatory risk, stifling genuine debate instead of fostering it.

Beyond its constitutional failings, the Fairness Doctrine limited the diversity and authenticity of public expression. Forcing outlets to artificially balance viewpoints treated the government as the ultimate curator of discourse, privileging conformity over creativity and dissent. Minority, unpopular, or novel perspectives were either suppressed or diluted, while established voices could manipulate the rules to their advantage. Far from promoting fairness, the Doctrine centralized control over information, undermined robust debate, and demonstrated the danger of granting the state the power to regulate the content of speech. It stands as a cautionary lesson for any modern proposal to regulate media or online platforms.

Micheale has spent years studying the Constitution, Federalists and Anti-Federalists papers, as well as key court decisions. He resides in Nashville.  

Rod's Comment: In addition to the excellent point Michael makes above, those who favor a return to the fairness doctrine should ask themselves if they want to have Trump-appointed people determining what is fairness when it comes to speech. 

Top Stories