It is Monday evening and there still is no staff analysis posted.
You can get your own copy of the Metro
council meeting agenda at this link: MetroCouncilAgenda. Council meetings can be really, really boring if you don't
know what the Council is voting on. With an agenda and analysis, they are just
really boring. At this time the staff analysis is not yet posted. If it is
posted on Monday, I will update this post with more analysis.
There are fourteen
resolutions, all of which are on the
consent agenda at this time. A resolution is on the consent agenda if it
passed the committees to which it was assigned unanimously. Bills on the consent agenda are usually not
controversial and tend to be routine matters. Resolutions on the consent agenda
are passed by a single voice vote of the Council rather than being considered
individually. If one is present and does
not ask to be recorded voting "no" then they are assumed to have
voted "aye." Any member of the body may have a bill pulled off
of the consent agenda.
Below are resolutions that may prove controversial and I suspect will be pulled off of the consent agenda:
- RESOLUTION NO. RS2013-558 is the amendment to the Capital Improvement Budget that adds the improvement to
the rear of Bridgestone Arena, which will be across the street from the front
of the new Music City center, and to establish a new central police precinct
which will be moved from its present location in the Bridgestone arena.
- RESOLUTION NO. RS2013-559 authorizes the city to issue general
obligation bonds of $110,000,000 to fund
the construction of the new police precinct and the Bridgestone Arena
improvements mentioned above and some other projects. I would expect someone to
object to this resolution and the one above and I would expect them to be pulled off of the
consent agenda but I expect both to pass.
Eric Cole is a former two-term councilmember
who has been an enthusiastic supporter of the mayor and who headed the Dean-funded
"grass roots" organization Moving Nashville Forward, which advocated
for the Mayor's increase in property tax hike. Eric Cole's wife is also on the
Metro payroll as head of the Metro Arts Commission.
This does not smell right. Why was the position
not advertised and filled by a non political person? There are numerous
agencies in town with experience administering similar programs such as
Individual Development Account programs and programs teaching financial
literacy. This money could have been given to United Way with instructions to
issue a RFP's and let agencies already experienced doing this compete for the
money . Why should a program like this
be administered out of the Mayor's office? Why was the position of program administrator
not advertised? How much salary
will Eric Cole's position be paid? This looks like using money intended to help
poor people being used to hire a political operative for the Mayor.
The other bills on the consent agenda appear routine and
I would not expect any of them to be pulled or see any that I think need to be
pulled.
Bills on First reading almost always pass. They are considered as a
group and are seldom discussed. First reading is a formality that simply allows
the bill to be considered. Bills are not assigned to committee or analyzed by
council staff until after they have passed first reading. There are only two bills
on first reading, neither very important nor controversial.
Bills on Second Reading. It is on Second reading, after bills have been
to committee, that discussion usually takes place. Below are bills of interest
on second reading;
SUBSTITUTE BILL NO. BL2012-283 is the new Metro
Solicitation bill that would impose new regulations on commercial
door-to-door solicitors. It passed unanimously on second reading
when previously on second reading and I expected it to sail on through
third reading. However, legal staff
had determined that the bill had a flaw that would prohibit it from
withstanding a First Amendment challenge.
Legal said it would violate the First Amendment to prohibit solicitation for
the "expressive arts."
Councilmember Clairborn asked for unanimous consent to amend the
bill to address that issue. To
amend a bill on third reading however requires unanimous consent and there were
objections so he successfully moved to rescind action on second reading
and move the bill back to second reading. That is why this bill is again on second reading. (Read
more about this issue.)
- BILL NO. BL2012-292 is the
bill would permit home recording studios in residential neighborhoods. It was on public hearing on 12/4/2012.
There were some in the music industry community who had problems with
the bill and the sponsor said she would work with them to improve the bill. It
will be interesting to see what they have come up with. Home recording
studios are not uncommon in Nashville.
- · BILL
NO. BL2013-338 by Tygard and Dominy looks very similar to a bill
which Councilman Dominy recently unsuccessfully tried to pass. This bill
says that "no sole source contract for the purchase of goods or services,
including contracts for economic development initiatives and services, with a
total contract amount in excess of two hundred fifty thousand dollars
($250,000) may be entered into unless and until such contract has been approved
by resolution duly adopted by the council by twenty-one affirmative
votes.”
I don't know how this bill differs from the
previous bill on the same subject, but I am glad to see Dominy is not giving up
the fight. I am glad to see Councilman Tygard join as cosponsor. This is a good
bill that needs to pass. One of the few sole source contracts that metro has is
the city's contract with the Chamber of Commerce for the Partnership 2020
program.
Partnership 2020 is a public-private
partnership developed by the chamber whose purpose is to recruit new businesses
to the Nashville area. Metro’s appropriation for this program in recent years
has been $300,000 a year. While the program serves a ten county area, Metro
funds a greater share of the program than the other nine counties combined.
Many feel that Metro funds the program, yet the bulk of new relocations to the
Nashville area go to surrounding counties.
- BILLNO. BL2013-339 and BILL
NO. BL2013-340 are more
bribes incentives to private
business to get them to expand in or relocate to Nashville. I would hope the
Council would consider the wisdom of this policy. If this continues, every
business of any size that could relocate will have a reason do so unless paid
not to so. Councilman Stites has been the lone voice in the Council opposing
these incentive deal. I expect to hear him ague against this deal. For more on
this, see here.
Bills on Third Reading: Third Reading is the final reading. If a
bill passes third reading it becomes law unless it is vetoed by the Mayor,
which has only rarely happened. There
are several zoning bills on third reading and some may interest neighbors of
the proposed rezoning, but none of them appear to be of general interest. None
of the other bills on third reading appear to be controversial.
Memorializing Resolutions: There are no
memorializing resolution on the agenda.
Top Stories