A right-leaning disgruntled Republican comments on the news of the day and any other thing he damn-well pleases.
Pages
Saturday, October 17, 2020
Civil Unrest advisory: East Nashville, Oct. 17th, all day.
Women with TDS march and then join the BLM mural painting party
The march is slated to end at the unveiling of Black Lives Matter mural on Woodland Street in East Nashville. ...
"I am marching because if we don’t demand change, our republic may not exist. I am marching because our democracy is on the line, said Yayne Abeba, Power Together Women’s March organizer.
.... the group wrote it would march in force "to send a clear message that we will not allow Trump and the GOP to endanger our lives any longer.Friday, October 16, 2020
Judge dismisses lawsuit aimed at stopping Nashville MLS stadium. State Fair to move to Wilson County
Thursday, October 15, 2020
It is despicable actions like this that makes me question Trump's fitness to serve.
by Rod Williams - The above is a retweet by President Trump that alleges that Joe Biden and President Obama may have had Seal team 6 killed. They were the team that took out Osama Ben Laden. Except, the author of the tweet doesn't believe Osama Ben Laden was killed and that President Obama had to have the Seal team killed to cover up the deception that he was killed. This is sick stuff. This come from an article in Forbes, and the shown tweet is a retweet by Trump from an account with a history of promoting the Q-Anon conspiracy theory. This is not the first time President Trump has peddled Q-Anon sick nonsense.
How to Steal an Election: Mail-In Ballots
Wednesday, October 14, 2020
Liberty on the Rocks - Nashville, Thursday, October 15, 2020, 5:30 PM
What: Liberty on the Rocks is a get-together that involves eating and drinking and talking and respectfully disagreeing and exchanging of ideas usually about some political topic (but not always political) which could be the upcoming election, or Mayor Cooper's handling of the response to Corona and the massive tax increase, other news of the day, or foreign policy, or the monetary system, or the roll of the family and gay marriage, or legalization of drugs or prostitution, or the welfare state, or education reform, or criminal justice and prison reform, or the death penalty, or immigration policy, or morality and values, or the current civil unrest, or just whatever topic one brings up. No prayer, no pledge, no speaker, no program.
When: Thursday, October 15 from 5:30 or whenever people arrive which starts about 5:30 until everyone leaves which usually means people start leaving about 8:30, but sometime later but you can come as late or leave as early as you please.
Where: Southside Kitchen and Pub, 2190 Nolensville PK, Nashville, TN.
Why: For the enjoyment of good conversation with like-minded people or at least mostly sensible people.
To RSVP or map follow this link. If you fail to RSVP, just show up. No big deal.
Time to get back to socialism- socializing. Since the onset of the nasty virus, attendance at these events has dropped. Don't let these monthly get togethers fade away.
First Beer on me. If you are new to Liberty on the Rocks and will be attending this Thursday for the first time, or the first time in a long time, let me know and the first round is on me. Rod Williams
Professor Brian Fitzpatrick guest speak of the Bastiat Society of Nashville, Wednesday, October 14th
AIER's Bastiat Society of Nashville invites you to join us tomorrow, October 14th, at 6:00pm for an in-person event with Professor Brian Fitzpatrick. The unexpected opportunity for President Trump to nominate a third judge - Amy Coney Barrett - to the Supreme Court brings to the forefront differing judicial interpretation approaches (e.g. originalism, textualism) and other key issues impacting the confirmation process, not the least of which is the impact of a nominee's religion.
Professor Fitzpatrick, who has clerked for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia (a Justice who was known for strong opinions on these issues), will highlight the issues impacting the confirmation process that is currently underway. The Bastiat Society of Nashville's speaker series is co-sponsored by The Beacon Center of Tennessee & The Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) (affiliated with Middle Tennessee State University). This co-sponsorship does not necessarily constitute endorsement of the speakers' positions on the issues discussed.
Registration Required. Let us know if you're coming.
Monday, October 12, 2020
Thousands attend "unpermitted" "Worship Protest" in Nashville on Sunday. Metro officials investigate and threaten punishment.
by Rod Williams - There was a massive "worship protest" in the park in front of the Metro Courthouse on Sunday. Thousands attended. Sean Feucht, a guy I have never heard of until now, was the organizer of the event. He is based out of California and apparently has a massive following in evangelical Christian circles. He has had similar events at cities across America. I am usually pretty attuned to what is happening in conservative, Republican, or libertarian circles in Nashville but did not know this event was planned. I am not nearly as attuned to the Christian community as I am the right-of-center political community. This was primarily, it seems, a religious event rather than a political event but addressed political issues.
Part of the message of the protest was racial reconciliation. A participant at the even by the name of McKibben is quoted in the Tennessean as saying that one of the messages that stood out to her from the event was that of racial reconciliation. This has long been a staple of evangelical, especially charismatic, Christianity. Feucht has expressed opposition to the BLM movement but approves of the sentiment. He has let protest in opposition to BLM. "We can’t let our God-given empathy get hijacked by a dark movement with hidden agendas", he has said on Facebook, according to The Tennessean.
The Tennessean and local government leaders and some mainstream Christian faith leaders have expressed concern over the large gathering with minimal social distancing and many not wearing mask. This is so hypocritical. Local officials said the event took place without a permit and the city was investigating and would pursue appropriate penalties against the organizer.
This is the heights of hypocrisy. Time and time again BLM has protested in Nashville and even closed streets with no permit. David Plazas community engagement editor for the Tennessean, editorialized about how irresponsible Feucht's event was. He has not so editorialized when thousands of BLM protestors took to the streets. This is an example of how our liberties are at stake. When favored groups can have a protest without a permit but groups not favored are suppose to get a permit, we are less free. When the government urges people to join the unpermitted protest of a favored group but threatens to take punitive action against an unfavored group for a protest, we are not free. Either a permit is required for a protest or it is not. Equality under the law is a basic tenant of democratic systems. I will gladly attend a unpermitted protest about the selective enforcement of law and government having one set of rules for favored groups and another set of rules for unfavored groups.
For more info on this see the following: link, link, Rogue Pandemic Preacher Brings ‘Superspreader’ Terror to Nashville.
Happy Columbus Day!
Trump will not win in a landslide. He may lose. If he loses, what follows?
Sunday, October 11, 2020
Top Democrats Contemplate Civil War If Biden Loses
Game Three: Clear Trump Win. The third scenario started with an Electoral College victory for President Trump (286 to 252), but a popular vote win (52% to 47%) for former Vice President Biden. In this scenario Biden refused to concede, convinced the Democratic governors of two states that Trump won to send separate slates of electors to the Electoral College, encouraged three states to threaten secession and convinced the House of Representatives to refuse to certify the election and declare Biden the victor."
This is pretty fascinating and I think it is a real possibility. If the election does lead to civil war, this is likely the way it happens. The participant to articulate this theory was Democrat John Podesta. He was White House Chief of Staff to President Bill Clinton from 1998 to 2001 and Counselor to President Barack Obama from 2014 to 2015. This of course does not mean Podesta nor his team believes this is what will happen. The whole project was "war games" or playing "what if." Here is the theory from the report itself:
Game Three: Clear Trump Win
The third scenario posited a comfortable Electoral College victory for President Trump — 286-252 — but also a significant popular vote win—52% - 47%--for former Vice President Biden. The game play ended in a constitutional crisis, with threats of secession, and the potential for either a decline into authoritarianism or a radically revamped set of democratic rules that ensure the popular will prevails (abolishment of the Electoral College, making DC and Puerto Rico states, and other changes). Key moves and actions include:
Turn One: The Trump Campaign had two main objectives at the outset of the scenario. The first priority was to legitimize the Electoral College results by pushing narratives that cast doubt on former Vice President Biden’s popular vote victory and portraying wide-spread protests of President Trump as anti-American, undemocratic, and promoting mob rule. The Trump Campaign planted agent provocateurs into the protests throughout the country to ensure these protests turned violent and helped further the narrative of a violent insurrection against a lawfully elected president.
The second Trump Campaign priority was to consolidate power to reduce or eliminate the “Deep State” and broader institutional resistance to President Trump’s agenda for his second term. Specific measures included selective promotions of military personnel with “pro-American views”, rushing judicial nominations, increasing financial incentives to big business, and working with states to maximize GOP control through redistricting. The GOP Elected Officials team was supportive of Trump’s efforts to crack down on protests. Establishing “law and order” and defeating the “anarchists” was a unifying call. But they pressed President Trump to “slow down” on the campaign’s more aggressive and overt efforts to consolidate power, partly out of concern that they would lose the support of moderate Democrats needed to publicly declare Trump’s victory legitimate.
The most consequential action of the first turn was the Biden Campaign’s retraction of its election night concession. It capitalized on the public’s outrage that for the third time in 20 years a candidate lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College. They also capitalized on concern about widespread voter suppression before and on Election Day. The Biden Campaign began the game by encouraging three states with Democratic governors—North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Michigan—to ask for recounts. As the game developed, governors in two of the three (Wisconsin and Michigan) sent separate slates of electors to counter those sent by the state legislature. The GOP failed to convince moderate Democrats in the House to break ranks with the Democratic resistance and support Trump’s electoral victory, much to the GOP’s surprise.
Part of the strategy here was to attack the Electoral College and to claim that the certified popular votes in these states were questionable because of voter suppression. At the end of the first turn, the country was in the midst of a full-blown constitutional crisis characterized by: 1) Political chaos; 2) Widespread threats of violence, and sporadic actual violence in the streets; and 4) A hostile, dangerous, highly-partisan, and frequently unconstrained information and media environment.
Turns Two and Three: The Biden Campaign encouraged Western states, particularly California but also Oregon and Washington, and collectively known as “Cascadia,” to secede from the Union unless Congressional Republicans agreed to a set of structural reforms to fix our democratic system to ensure majority rule. With advice from President Obama, the Biden Campaign submitted a proposal to:
1) Give statehood to Washington, DC and Puerto Rico;
2) Divide California into five states to more accurately represent its population in the Senate;
3) Require Supreme Court justices to retire at 70; and
4) Eliminate the Electoral College, to ensure that the candidate who wins to the popular vote becomes President.
As the scenario evolved, the Trump Team focused its efforts on driving a wedge into the disparate and, in the view of many participants, fragile Democratic coalition. For example, during the second turn, Trump gave an interview to The Intercept in which he stated that he would have lost the election if Bernie Sanders had been nominated. The Trump Team’s approach in turns two and three also emphasized creating the conditions to force the Biden Campaign into taking provocative, unprecedented actions—such as supporting California’s secession or sending a second slate of electors—that played into a broader narrative of the Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup.
The team also tried to position President Trump as a “unifier”—working with top CEOs, holding a unifying event at the Lincoln Memorial, offering to establish a commission to review electoral rules—and as prioritizing safety and security in the face of radical groups supporting Joe Biden and trying to destroy America.
One of the most consequential moves was that Team Biden on January 6 provoked a breakdown in the joint session of Congress by getting the House of Representatives to agree to award the presidency to Biden (based on the alternative pro-Biden submissions sent by pro-Biden governors). Pence and the GOP refused to accept this, declaring instead that Trump was reelected under the Constitution because of his Electoral College victory. This partisan division remained unresolved because neither side backed down, and January 20 arrived without a single president-elect entitled to be Commander-in-Chief after noon that day. It was unclear what the military would do in this situation.






